8 research outputs found
Anatomical information science
The Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) is a map of the human body. Like maps of other sorts – including the map-like representations we find in familiar anatomical atlases – it is a representation of a certain portion of spatial reality as it exists at a certain (idealized) instant of time. But unlike other maps, the FMA comes in the form of a sophisticated ontology of its objectdomain, comprising some 1.5 million statements of anatomical relations among some 70,000 anatomical kinds. It is further distinguished from other maps in that it represents not some specific portion of spatial reality (say: Leeds in 1996), but rather the generalized or idealized spatial reality associated with a generalized or idealized human being at some generalized or idealized instant of time. It will be our concern in what follows to outline the approach to ontology that is represented by the FMA and to argue that it can serve as the basis for a new type of anatomical information science. We also draw some implications for our understanding of spatial reasoning and spatial ontologies in general
FORT: a minimal Foundational Ontological Relations Theory for Conceptual Modeling Tasks
Foundational relations play an important role in the ontological foundations of conceptual modeling. Their investigation has been theoretically addressed in philosophical/ontological theories, and empirically offered in foundational ontologies (FOs). FOs are comprehensive theories that model the world as top-level entities and relations. Empirically, for modelers aiming to use foundational relations without an urge for entity types, FOs seem to be complex to comprehend, comply with, and integrate in practice. And since the practice of these relations is critical for conceptual modeling tasks, we present an approach that builds a well-founded entity-type free relations theory within a first-order-logic formalization, besides large complex FOs. The theory contributes to a minimal set of foundational ontological relations (FORT) by importing extant theories (mereotopology and location) and (re-)formalizing other relations (dependence, membership, constitution, and entity-location), while no FO has compromised this set
Relations in biomedical ontologies
To enhance the treatment of relations in biomedical ontologies we advance a methodology for providing consistent and unambiguous formal definitions of the relational expressions used in such ontologies in a way designed to assist developers and users in avoiding errors in coding and annotation. The resulting Relation Ontology can promote interoperability of ontologies and support new types of automated reasoning about the spatial and temporal dimensions of biological and medical phenomena
Accommodating Ontologies to Biological Reality—Top-Level Categories of Cumulative-Constitutively Organized Material Entities
BACKGROUND: The Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) is a top-level formal foundational ontology for the biomedical domain. It has been developed with the purpose to serve as an ontologically consistent template for top-level categories of application oriented and domain reference ontologies within the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies Foundry (OBO). BFO is important for enabling OBO ontologies to facilitate in reliably communicating and managing data and metadata within and across biomedical databases. Following its intended single inheritance policy, BFO's three top-level categories of material entity (i.e. ‘object’, ‘fiat object part’, ‘object aggregate’) must be exhaustive and mutually disjoint. We have shown elsewhere that for accommodating all types of constitutively organized material entities, BFO must be extended by additional categories of material entity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Unfortunately, most biomedical material entities are cumulative-constitutively organized. We show that even the extended BFO does not exhaustively cover cumulative-constitutively organized material entities. We provide examples from biology and everyday life that demonstrate the necessity for ‘portion of matter’ as another material building block. This implies the necessity for further extending BFO by ‘portion of matter’ as well as three additional categories that possess portions of matter as aggregate components. These extensions are necessary if the basic assumption that all parts that share the same granularity level exhaustively sum to the whole should also apply to cumulative-constitutively organized material entities. By suggesting a notion of granular representation we provide a way to maintain the single inheritance principle when dealing with cumulative-constitutively organized material entities. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We suggest to extend BFO to incorporate additional categories of material entity and to rearrange its top-level material entity taxonomy. With these additions and the notion of granular representation, BFO would exhaustively cover all top-level types of material entities that application oriented ontologies may use as templates, while still maintaining the single inheritance principle
The Foundational Model of Anatomy Ontology
Anatomy is the structure of biological organisms. The term also denotes the scientific
discipline devoted to the study of anatomical entities and the structural and
developmental relations that obtain among these entities during the lifespan of an
organism. Anatomical entities are the independent continuants of biomedical reality on
which physiological and disease processes depend, and which, in response to etiological
agents, can transform themselves into pathological entities. For these reasons, hard copy
and in silico information resources in virtually all fields of biology and medicine, as a
rule, make extensive reference to anatomical entities. Because of the lack of a
generalizable, computable representation of anatomy, developers of computable
terminologies and ontologies in clinical medicine and biomedical research represented
anatomy from their own more or less divergent viewpoints. The resulting heterogeneity
presents a formidable impediment to correlating human anatomy not only across
computational resources but also with the anatomy of model organisms used in
biomedical experimentation. The Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) is being
developed to fill the need for a generalizable anatomy ontology, which can be used and
adapted by any computer-based application that requires anatomical information.
Moreover it is evolving into a standard reference for divergent views of anatomy and a
template for representing the anatomy of animals. A distinction is made between the FMA
ontology as a theory of anatomy and the implementation of this theory as the FMA
artifact. In either sense of the term, the FMA is a spatial-structural ontology of the
entities and relations which together form the phenotypic structure of the human
organism at all biologically salient levels of granularity. Making use of explicit
ontological principles and sound methods, it is designed to be understandable by human
beings and navigable by computers. The FMA’s ontological structure provides for
machine-based inference, enabling powerful computational tools of the future to reason
with biomedical data