TLAD 2011 Proceedings:9th international workshop on teaching, learning and assesment of databases (TLAD)

This is the ninth in the series of highly successful international workshops on the Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Databases (TLAD 2011), which once again is held as a workshop of BNCOD 2011 - the 28th British National Conference on Databases. TLAD 2011 is held on the 11th July at Manchester University, just before BNCOD, and hopes to be just as successful as its predecessors.The teaching of databases is central to all Computing Science, Software Engineering, Information Systems and Information Technology courses, and this year, the workshop aims to continue the tradition of bringing together both database teachers and researchers, in order to share good learning, teaching and assessment practice and experience, and further the growing community amongst database academics. As well as attracting academics from the UK community, the workshop has also been successful in attracting academics from the wider international community, through serving on the programme committee, and attending and presenting papers.Due to the healthy number of high quality submissions this year, the workshop will present eight peer reviewed papers. Of these, six will be presented as full papers and two as short papers. These papers cover a number of themes, including: the teaching of data mining and data warehousing, databases and the cloud, and novel uses of technology in teaching and assessment. It is expected that these papers will stimulate discussion at the workshop itself and beyond. This year, the focus on providing a forum for discussion is enhanced through a panel discussion on assessment in database modules, with David Nelson (of the University of Sunderland), Al Monger (of Southampton Solent University) and Charles Boisvert (of Sheffield Hallam University) as the expert panel

TLAD 2011 Proceedings:9th international workshop on teaching, learning and assesment of databases (TLAD)

This is the ninth in the series of highly successful international workshops on the Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Databases (TLAD 2011), which once again is held as a workshop of BNCOD 2011 - the 28th British National Conference on Databases. TLAD 2011 is held on the 11th July at Manchester University, just before BNCOD, and hopes to be just as successful as its predecessors.The teaching of databases is central to all Computing Science, Software Engineering, Information Systems and Information Technology courses, and this year, the workshop aims to continue the tradition of bringing together both database teachers and researchers, in order to share good learning, teaching and assessment practice and experience, and further the growing community amongst database academics. As well as attracting academics from the UK community, the workshop has also been successful in attracting academics from the wider international community, through serving on the programme committee, and attending and presenting papers.Due to the healthy number of high quality submissions this year, the workshop will present eight peer reviewed papers. Of these, six will be presented as full papers and two as short papers. These papers cover a number of themes, including: the teaching of data mining and data warehousing, databases and the cloud, and novel uses of technology in teaching and assessment. It is expected that these papers will stimulate discussion at the workshop itself and beyond. This year, the focus on providing a forum for discussion is enhanced through a panel discussion on assessment in database modules, with David Nelson (of the University of Sunderland), Al Monger (of Southampton Solent University) and Charles Boisvert (of Sheffield Hallam University) as the expert panel

Finding the Hidden: Detecting Atypical Affective States from Physiological Signals

In cognitive science, intuition is described as a strategy of processing information that relies on people's instinctive and emotional criteria. When compared with the deliberate choices made after conscious reasoning, the quick and intuitive decision making strategies can be more effective. The intuitive thinking provokes changes in human physiological responses which can be measured by sensors. Utilising physiological reactions, previous work shows that atypical patterns such as emotion expressions and image manipulations can be identified. This thesis expands the exploration to examine whether more atypical human behaviour can be recognised from physiological signals. The examined subtly atypical behaviour includes depression, doubt and deception, Depression is a serious chronic mental disease and is considered as an atypical health condition in people. Doubt is defined as a non-deliberate attempt to mislead others and is a passive form of deception, representing an atypicality from honest behaviours. Deception is a more purposeful attempt to deceive, and thus is a distinct type of atypicality than honest communication. Through examining physiological reactions from presenters who have a particular atypical behaviour or condition, and observers who view behaviours of presenters, this research aims to recognise atypicality in human behaviour. A collection of six user studies are conducted. In two user studies, presenters are asked to conduct doubting and deceiving behaviours, while the remaining user studies involve observers watching behaviours of presenters who suffer from depression, have doubt, or have conducted deception. Physiological reactions of both presenters and observers are collected, including Blood Volume Pulse, Electrodermal Activity, Skin Temperature and Pupillary Responses. Observers are also asked to explicitly evaluate whether the viewed presenters were being depressed, doubting, or deceiving. Investigations upon physiological data in this thesis finds that detectable cues corresponding with depression, doubt and deception can be found. Viewing depression provokes visceral physiological reactions in observers that can be measured. Such physiological responses can be used to derive features for machine learning models to accurately distinguish between healthy individuals and people with depression. By contrast, depression does not provoke strong conscious recognition in observers, resulting in a conscious evaluation accuracy slightly above chance level. Similar results are also found in detecting doubt and deception. People with doubt and deceit elicit consistent physiological reactions within themselves. These bodily responses can be utilised by machine learning models or deep learning models to recognise doubt or deception. The doubt and deceit in presenters can also be recognised using physiological signals in observers, with excellent recognition rates which are higher when compared with the conscious judgments from the same group of observers. The results indicate that atypicality in presenters can both be captured by physiological signals of presenters and observers. Presenters' physiological reactions contribute to higher recognition of atypicality, but observers' physiological responses can serve as a comparable alternative. The awareness of atypicality among observers happens physiologically, so can be used by machine learning models, even when they do not reach the consciousness of the person. The research findings lead to a further discussion around the implications of observers' physiological responses. Decision support applications which utilise a quantifiable measure of people's unconscious and intuitive 'gut feeling' can be developed based on the work reported here to assist people with medical diagnosis, information credibility evaluation, and criminal detection. Further research suggests exploring more atypical behaviours in the wild