4 research outputs found

    English speaking proficiency assessment using speech and electroencephalography signals

    Get PDF
    In this paper, the English speaking proficiency level of non-native English speakerswas automatically estimated as high, medium, or low performance. For thisĀ purpose, the speech of 142 non-native English speakers was recorded and electroencephalography (EEG) signals of 58 of them were recorded while speaking in English. Two systems were proposed for estimating the English proficiency level of the speaker; one used 72 audio features, extracted from speech signals, and the other used 112 features extracted from EEG signals. Multi-class support vector machines (SVM) was used for training and testing both systems using a cross-validation strategy. The speech-based system outperformed the EEG system with 68% accuracy on 60 testing audio recordings, compared with 56% accuracy on 30 testing EEG recordings

    Prosodic factors that affect the accentedness of L2 Japanese utterances: What matters most?

    Get PDF
    This study aims to identify which of two crucial prosodic factors has greatest impact on native speakersā€™ judgement of the accentedness of second language (L2) pronunciation. Prosodic features are already known to have more impact on the accentedness of L2 learnersā€™ pronunciation than segmental features do. In this study, timing and pitch are looked at as major prosodic factors that affect native speakersā€™ accentedness judgement of L2 pronunciation. To examine the relative importance of timing and pitch, two types of speech samplesā€”natural speech and prosody-modified speechā€”were used. In two experiments, native Japanese listeners assessed the accentedness of these stimuli and the results were compared. Both experiments obtained the same result: that timing is more important than pitch in improving the perceived naturalness of L2 Japanese speech

    Fluency-related Temporal Features and Syllable Prominence as Prosodic Proficiency Predictors for Learners of English with Different Language Backgrounds

    Get PDF
    Prosodic features are important in achieving intelligibility, comprehensibility, and fluency in a second or foreign language (L2). However, research on the assessment of prosody as part of oral proficiency remains scarce. Moreover, the acoustic analysis of L2 prosody has often focused on fluency-related temporal measures, neglecting language-dependent stress features that can be quantified in terms of syllable prominence. Introducing the evaluation of prominence-related measures can be of use in developing both teaching and assessment of L2 speaking skills. In this study we compare temporal measures and syllable prominence estimates as predictors of prosodic proficiency in non-native speakers of English with respect to the speaker's native language (L1). The predictive power of temporal and prominence measures was evaluated for utterance-sized samples produced by language learners from four different L1 backgrounds: Czech, Slovak, Polish, and Hungarian. Firstly, the speech samples were assessed using the revised Common European Framework of Reference scale for prosodic features. The assessed speech samples were then analyzed to derive articulation rate and three fluency measures. Syllable-level prominence was estimated by a continuous wavelet transform analysis using combinations of F0, energy, and syllable duration. The results show that the temporal measures serve as reliable predictors of prosodic proficiency in the L2, with prominence measures providing a small but significant improvement to prosodic proficiency predictions. The predictive power of the individual measures varies both quantitatively and qualitatively depending on the L1 of the speaker. We conclude that the possible effects of the speaker's L1 on the production of L2 prosody in terms of temporal features as well as syllable prominence deserve more attention in applied research and developing teaching and assessment methods for spoken L2.Peer reviewe
    corecore