Are your sites down? Requirements-driven self-tuning for the survivability of web systems

Running in a highly uncertain and greatly complex environment, Web systems cannot always provide full set of services with optimal quality, especially when work loads are high or subsystem failures are frequent. Hence, it is significant to continuously maintain a high satisfaction level of survivability, hereafter survivability assurance, while relaxing or sacrificing certain quality or functional requirements that are not crucial to the survival of the entire system. After giving a value-based interpretation to survivability assurance to facilitate a quantitative analysis, we propose a requirements-driven self-tuning method for the survivability assurance of Web systems. Maintaining an enriched and live goal model, our method adapts to runtime tradeoff decisions made by our PID (propor-tional-integral-derivative) controller and goal-oriented reasoner for both quality and functional requirements. The goal-based configuration plans produced by the reasoner is carried out on the live goal model, and then mapped into system architectural configurations. Experiments on an online shopping system are conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method

Uncertainty handling in goal-driven self-optimization – limiting the negative effect on adaptation

Goal-driven self-optimization through feedback loops has shown effectiveness in reducing oscillating utilities due to a large number of uncertain factors in the runtime environments. However, such self-optimization is less satisfactory when there contains uncertainty in the predefined requirements goal models, such as imprecise contributions and unknown quality preferences, or during the switches of goal solutions, such as lack of understanding about the time for the adaptation actions to take effect. In this paper, we propose to handle such uncertainty in goal-driven self-optimization without interrupting the services. Taking the monitored quality values as the feedback, and the estimated earned value as the global indicator of self-optimization, our approach dynamically updates the quantitative contributions from alternative functionalities to quality requirements, tunes the preferences of relevant quality requirements, and determines a proper timing delay for the last adaptation action to take effect. After applying these runtime measures to limit the negative effect of the uncertainty in goal models and their suggested switches, an experimental study on a real-life online shopping system shows the improvements over goal-driven self-optimization approaches without uncertainty handling

Maps of Lessons Learnt in Requirements Engineering

Both researchers and practitioners have emphasized the importance of learning from past experiences and its consequential impact on project time, cost, and quality. However, from the survey we conducted of requirements engineering (RE) practitioners, over 70\% of the respondents stated that they seldom use RE lessons in the RE process, though 85\% of these would use such lessons if readily available. Our observation, however, is that RE lessons are scattered, mainly implicitly, in the literature and practice, which obviously, does not help the situation. We, therefore, present ``maps” of RE lessons which would highlight weak (dark) and strong (bright) areas of RE (and hence RE theories). Such maps would thus be: (a) a driver for research to ``light up” the darker areas of RE and (b) a guide for practice to benefit from the brighter areas. To achieve this goal, we populated the maps with over 200 RE lessons elicited from literature and practice using a systematic literature review and survey. The results show that approximately 80\% of the elicited lessons are implicit and that approximately 70\% of the lessons deal with the elicitation, analysis, and specification RE phases only. The RE Lesson Maps, elicited lessons, and the results from populating the maps provide novel scientific groundings for lessons learnt in RE as this topic has not yet been systematically studied in the field