5,049 research outputs found

    Approximating Subdense Instances of Covering Problems

    Full text link
    We study approximability of subdense instances of various covering problems on graphs, defined as instances in which the minimum or average degree is Omega(n/psi(n)) for some function psi(n)=omega(1) of the instance size. We design new approximation algorithms as well as new polynomial time approximation schemes (PTASs) for those problems and establish first approximation hardness results for them. Interestingly, in some cases we were able to prove optimality of the underlying approximation ratios, under usual complexity-theoretic assumptions. Our results for the Vertex Cover problem depend on an improved recursive sampling method which could be of independent interest

    Probabilistic Spectral Sparsification In Sublinear Time

    Full text link
    In this paper, we introduce a variant of spectral sparsification, called probabilistic (ε,δ)(\varepsilon,\delta)-spectral sparsification. Roughly speaking, it preserves the cut value of any cut (S,Sc)(S,S^{c}) with an 1±ε1\pm\varepsilon multiplicative error and a δS\delta\left|S\right| additive error. We show how to produce a probabilistic (ε,δ)(\varepsilon,\delta)-spectral sparsifier with O(nlogn/ε2)O(n\log n/\varepsilon^{2}) edges in time O~(n/ε2δ)\tilde{O}(n/\varepsilon^{2}\delta) time for unweighted undirected graph. This gives fastest known sub-linear time algorithms for different cut problems on unweighted undirected graph such as - An O~(n/OPT+n3/2+t)\tilde{O}(n/OPT+n^{3/2+t}) time O(logn/t)O(\sqrt{\log n/t})-approximation algorithm for the sparsest cut problem and the balanced separator problem. - A n1+o(1)/ε4n^{1+o(1)}/\varepsilon^{4} time approximation minimum s-t cut algorithm with an εn\varepsilon n additive error

    From Gap-ETH to FPT-Inapproximability: Clique, Dominating Set, and More

    Full text link
    We consider questions that arise from the intersection between the areas of polynomial-time approximation algorithms, subexponential-time algorithms, and fixed-parameter tractable algorithms. The questions, which have been asked several times (e.g., [Marx08, FGMS12, DF13]), are whether there is a non-trivial FPT-approximation algorithm for the Maximum Clique (Clique) and Minimum Dominating Set (DomSet) problems parameterized by the size of the optimal solution. In particular, letting OPT\text{OPT} be the optimum and NN be the size of the input, is there an algorithm that runs in t(OPT)poly(N)t(\text{OPT})\text{poly}(N) time and outputs a solution of size f(OPT)f(\text{OPT}), for any functions tt and ff that are independent of NN (for Clique, we want f(OPT)=ω(1)f(\text{OPT})=\omega(1))? In this paper, we show that both Clique and DomSet admit no non-trivial FPT-approximation algorithm, i.e., there is no o(OPT)o(\text{OPT})-FPT-approximation algorithm for Clique and no f(OPT)f(\text{OPT})-FPT-approximation algorithm for DomSet, for any function ff (e.g., this holds even if ff is the Ackermann function). In fact, our results imply something even stronger: The best way to solve Clique and DomSet, even approximately, is to essentially enumerate all possibilities. Our results hold under the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) [Dinur16, MR16], which states that no 2o(n)2^{o(n)}-time algorithm can distinguish between a satisfiable 3SAT formula and one which is not even (1ϵ)(1 - \epsilon)-satisfiable for some constant ϵ>0\epsilon > 0. Besides Clique and DomSet, we also rule out non-trivial FPT-approximation for Maximum Balanced Biclique, Maximum Subgraphs with Hereditary Properties, and Maximum Induced Matching in bipartite graphs. Additionally, we rule out ko(1)k^{o(1)}-FPT-approximation algorithm for Densest kk-Subgraph although this ratio does not yet match the trivial O(k)O(k)-approximation algorithm.Comment: 43 pages. To appear in FOCS'1

    Random local algorithms

    Full text link
    Consider the problem when we want to construct some structure on a bounded degree graph, e.g. an almost maximum matching, and we want to decide about each edge depending only on its constant radius neighbourhood. We show that the information about the local statistics of the graph does not help here. Namely, if there exists a random local algorithm which can use any local statistics about the graph, and produces an almost optimal structure, then the same can be achieved by a random local algorithm using no statistics.Comment: 9 page

    Global Cardinality Constraints Make Approximating Some Max-2-CSPs Harder

    Get PDF
    Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, we show that existing approximation algorithms for some Boolean Max-2-CSPs with cardinality constraints are optimal. In particular, we prove that Max-Cut with cardinality constraints is UG-hard to approximate within ~~0.858, and that Max-2-Sat with cardinality constraints is UG-hard to approximate within ~~0.929. In both cases, the previous best hardness results were the same as the hardness of the corresponding unconstrained Max-2-CSP (~~0.878 for Max-Cut, and ~~0.940 for Max-2-Sat). The hardness for Max-2-Sat applies to monotone Max-2-Sat instances, meaning that we also obtain tight inapproximability for the Max-k-Vertex-Cover problem

    Hamilton cycles, minimum degree and bipartite holes

    Full text link
    We present a tight extremal threshold for the existence of Hamilton cycles in graphs with large minimum degree and without a large ``bipartite hole`` (two disjoint sets of vertices with no edges between them). This result extends Dirac's classical theorem, and is related to a theorem of Chv\'atal and Erd\H{o}s. In detail, an (s,t)(s, t)-bipartite-hole in a graph GG consists of two disjoint sets of vertices SS and TT with S=s|S|= s and T=t|T|=t such that there are no edges between SS and TT; and α~(G)\widetilde{\alpha}(G) is the maximum integer rr such that GG contains an (s,t)(s, t)-bipartite-hole for every pair of non-negative integers ss and tt with s+t=rs + t = r. Our central theorem is that a graph GG with at least 33 vertices is Hamiltonian if its minimum degree is at least α~(G)\widetilde{\alpha}(G). From the proof we obtain a polynomial time algorithm that either finds a Hamilton cycle or a large bipartite hole. The theorem also yields a condition for the existence of kk edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles. We see that for dense random graphs G(n,p)G(n,p), the probability of failing to contain many edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles is (1p)(1+o(1))n(1 - p)^{(1 + o(1))n}. Finally, we discuss the complexity of calculating and approximating α~(G)\widetilde{\alpha}(G)
    corecore