44,926 research outputs found
The Goodman-Nguyen Relation within Imprecise Probability Theory
The Goodman-Nguyen relation is a partial order generalising the implication
(inclusion) relation to conditional events. As such, with precise probabilities
it both induces an agreeing probability ordering and is a key tool in a certain
common extension problem. Most previous work involving this relation is
concerned with either conditional event algebras or precise probabilities. We
investigate here its role within imprecise probability theory, first in the
framework of conditional events and then proposing a generalisation of the
Goodman-Nguyen relation to conditional gambles. It turns out that this relation
induces an agreeing ordering on coherent or C-convex conditional imprecise
previsions. In a standard inferential problem with conditional events, it lets
us determine the natural extension, as well as an upper extension. With
conditional gambles, it is useful in deriving a number of inferential
inequalities.Comment: Published version:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X1400101
2-coherent and 2-convex Conditional Lower Previsions
In this paper we explore relaxations of (Williams) coherent and convex
conditional previsions that form the families of -coherent and -convex
conditional previsions, at the varying of . We investigate which such
previsions are the most general one may reasonably consider, suggesting
(centered) -convex or, if positive homogeneity and conjugacy is needed,
-coherent lower previsions. Basic properties of these previsions are
studied. In particular, we prove that they satisfy the Generalized Bayes Rule
and always have a -convex or, respectively, -coherent natural extension.
The role of these extensions is analogous to that of the natural extension for
coherent lower previsions. On the contrary, -convex and -coherent
previsions with either are convex or coherent themselves or have no
extension of the same type on large enough sets. Among the uncertainty concepts
that can be modelled by -convexity, we discuss generalizations of capacities
and niveloids to a conditional framework and show that the well-known risk
measure Value-at-Risk only guarantees to be centered -convex. In the final
part, we determine the rationality requirements of -convexity and
-coherence from a desirability perspective, emphasising how they weaken
those of (Williams) coherence.Comment: This is the authors' version of a work that was accepted for
publication in the International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 77,
October 2016, pages 66-86, doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2016.06.003,
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X1630079
Default Logic in a Coherent Setting
In this talk - based on the results of a forthcoming paper (Coletti,
Scozzafava and Vantaggi 2002), presented also by one of us at the Conference on
"Non Classical Logic, Approximate Reasoning and Soft-Computing" (Anacapri,
Italy, 2001) - we discuss the problem of representing default rules by means of
a suitable coherent conditional probability, defined on a family of conditional
events. An event is singled-out (in our approach) by a proposition, that is a
statement that can be either true or false; a conditional event is consequently
defined by means of two propositions and is a 3-valued entity, the third value
being (in this context) a conditional probability
From imprecise probability assessments to conditional probabilities with quasi additive classes of conditioning events
In this paper, starting from a generalized coherent (i.e. avoiding uniform
loss) intervalvalued probability assessment on a finite family of conditional
events, we construct conditional probabilities with quasi additive classes of
conditioning events which are consistent with the given initial assessment.
Quasi additivity assures coherence for the obtained conditional probabilities.
In order to reach our goal we define a finite sequence of conditional
probabilities by exploiting some theoretical results on g-coherence. In
particular, we use solutions of a finite sequence of linear systems.Comment: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Conference on Uncertainty
in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2012
Epistemic irrelevance in credal nets: the case of imprecise Markov trees
We focus on credal nets, which are graphical models that generalise Bayesian
nets to imprecise probability. We replace the notion of strong independence
commonly used in credal nets with the weaker notion of epistemic irrelevance,
which is arguably more suited for a behavioural theory of probability. Focusing
on directed trees, we show how to combine the given local uncertainty models in
the nodes of the graph into a global model, and we use this to construct and
justify an exact message-passing algorithm that computes updated beliefs for a
variable in the tree. The algorithm, which is linear in the number of nodes, is
formulated entirely in terms of coherent lower previsions, and is shown to
satisfy a number of rationality requirements. We supply examples of the
algorithm's operation, and report an application to on-line character
recognition that illustrates the advantages of our approach for prediction. We
comment on the perspectives, opened by the availability, for the first time, of
a truly efficient algorithm based on epistemic irrelevance.Comment: 29 pages, 5 figures, 1 tabl
Coherent frequentism
By representing the range of fair betting odds according to a pair of
confidence set estimators, dual probability measures on parameter space called
frequentist posteriors secure the coherence of subjective inference without any
prior distribution. The closure of the set of expected losses corresponding to
the dual frequentist posteriors constrains decisions without arbitrarily
forcing optimization under all circumstances. This decision theory reduces to
those that maximize expected utility when the pair of frequentist posteriors is
induced by an exact or approximate confidence set estimator or when an
automatic reduction rule is applied to the pair. In such cases, the resulting
frequentist posterior is coherent in the sense that, as a probability
distribution of the parameter of interest, it satisfies the axioms of the
decision-theoretic and logic-theoretic systems typically cited in support of
the Bayesian posterior. Unlike the p-value, the confidence level of an interval
hypothesis derived from such a measure is suitable as an estimator of the
indicator of hypothesis truth since it converges in sample-space probability to
1 if the hypothesis is true or to 0 otherwise under general conditions.Comment: The confidence-measure theory of inference and decision is explicitly
extended to vector parameters of interest. The derivation of upper and lower
confidence levels from valid and nonconservative set estimators is formalize
- …