51 research outputs found

    Antecedents of Continuance Intention of RFID Technology in Western Australian Farms

    Get PDF
    In literature, adoption and continuance of an innovation have been considered as discrete events and discussed in separate models. This study argues that these are interrelated and continuous processes. The objective of this study is to investigate the adoption and continuance behaviour of a technological innovation in a single framework taking Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) as the context. Applying the quantitative research approach, this study finds that external environment, the technology itself, and the organization factors influence RFID adoption whereas the continuance of RFID technology is dependent on confirmation and satisfaction from using the technology. Moreover, confirmation is the immediate next stage of adoption where the adopters justify their adoption decision and take required actions and/or adjustments. Data were analysed using Partial Least Square (PLS)- based Structured Equation Modelling (SEM) tool. The discussion and implications on the findings are discussed in detail

    Determinants of continuance intention of RFID in Australian livestock industry: An empirical study

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study is to develop and refine a theoretical framework to examine the continuance intention of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology in Australian livestock industry. A mixed-method research approach, consisting qualitative and quantitative, has been taken for this study. The findings of this study show that the continued RFID usage intention is influenced by satisfaction from current use, and confirmation of expectations. As a practical contribution, the findings of this study can be addressed by the Australian agricultural agencies as an acid-test of its current and future mandatory RFID policy. Policymakers can compare their experience with the findings of this study, evaluate the past, and reassess the future. As a theoretical contribution, this study is a first of its kind considering and incorporating 'adoption' in a confirmation-satisfaction framework to examine the continued usage behaviour of RFID

    Adoption factors of RFID in a voluntary environment: An empirical investigation from Australian livestock industry

    Get PDF
    The objective of this study is to investigate the contributing factors for Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) adoption in a voluntary setting. Adopting a mixed method consisting both qualitative and quantitative approaches, the findings of this study reveals that external pressure, RFID costs, and management attitude toward RFID are the main factors to intend to adopt RFID. Moreover, expectations from RFID use are significantly important for its adoption

    Factors influencing the mandatory adoption of RFID: An empirical investigation from Australian livestock industry

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study is to examine the factors of RFID adoption in a mandatory environment.This paper presents the result of an empirical study that investigates the adoption behaviour of livestock farms in relation to Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology in the context ofAustralia. A mixed method consisting qualitative and quantitative research approach has been taken for this study. The finding of this study confirmed that external environment, technological characteristics, and organizational factors are significant for RFID adoption. Alternatively, expectations from RFID-adoption do not have an influence on RFID adoption when the adoption is mandatory

    Dynamics and Promotion Triads in Meeting Destinations:<strong/>

    Get PDF

    The development and validation of HRIS implementation scale

    Get PDF
    Computerized human resource information systems (HRIS) is an innovation in human resource management (HRM) that has been adopted by many organizations to increase HRM effectiveness and enhance organizational communication. However, in Pakistan, the adoption of HRIS is still rather limited. In order to understand the issue of HRIS adoption, the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory explains the process of innovation adoption. Nevertheless, most of the previous studies conducted on HRIS adoption stopped at the decision stage (third stage) of the adoption process, whereby a dichotomous scale of โ€˜yesโ€™ and โ€˜Noโ€™ was used. Organizations could not get the benefits of HRIS at the decision stage; hence HRIS adoption should be measured at the implementation stage (fourth stage). Unfortunately, previous studies have not studied HRIS adoption at the implementation stage and thus, a scale for measuring HRIS adoption at the implementation stage has to be developed. Using a qualitative research method, the first phase of this study developed a new scale of HRIS adoption at the implementation stage. The qualitative data were collected in July, August, and September of 2016. Data was collected through interviews from the experts of IS and HR in Pakistan. The new scale is unidimensional with ten items. The second phase applied a quantitative research method to test and validate the scale and at the same time, examine the research framework which was established based on the theory of DOI and technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework. Second phase mainly tested the relationship between technological (IT infrastructure, IT expertise), organizational (Top management support, HRM practices, financial readiness), environmental (competitive pressure) factors and HRIS implementation. The data were collected from listed organizations in Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed, to HR managers of the organizations, using a systematic random sampling technique and 173 were returned. This study used SPSS V23 and smart PLS 3 for data analysis. This study found IT infrastructure, IT expertise, financial readiness, and top management support (TMS) have a significant positive effect on HRIS adoption. On the other hand, HR practices and competitive pressure have no significant effect on HRIS implementation. The overall reliability of HRIS implementation as measured using Cronbachโ€™s alpha was 0.92. This study provides a few theoretical and practical contributions. First, how to measure HRIS implementation in organizations. The main contribution of this study is the development of HRIS implementations scale. It can be used by researchers to examine relationships with other important factors, explained by TOE framework, that can affect the implementation of HRIS in the organizations. This scale will also provide the bases for researchers in other IS based studies at implementation stage

    ๋‚™๋†์—…์—์„œ ์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ ์šฉ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ • ์š”์ธ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ: ํƒ์ƒ‰์  ๊ณ ์ฐฐ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋†๊ฒฝ์ œ์‚ฌํšŒํ•™๋ถ€(์ง€์—ญ์ •๋ณด์ „๊ณต), 2012. 8. ์ตœ์˜์ฐฌ.๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜์˜ ์ •๋ณด ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ถ• ๊ด€๋ฆฌ, ๋†’์€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์˜ ์ œํ’ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์†Œ๋น„์ž์˜ ์ˆ˜์š”, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ •๋ถ€ ๊ทœ์ œ ๋“ฑ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์™€ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฐ•ํ™” ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋” ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋†์—…์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” (Wang et al., 2006), ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์œ ํšจํ•œ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ (Zhang et al., 2002) ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ถ•์‚ฐ์—…์€ ๊ฐ€์ถ• ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋ณด๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ (Banhazi et al., 2007Mertens et al., 2011) ์™€ ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ํ™œ๋™์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์œ ๋ž˜๋œ ๋น„๊ต์  ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ•™๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋†์‚ฐ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ด๋ค„์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค (Thomas and Callahan, 2002). ๋†๋ถ€๋“ค์€ 1980๋…„๋Œ€์™€ 1990๋…„๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์น˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ–ˆ๋‹ค (Schmidt et al., 1994). ๋˜ํ•œ ๋†๋ถ€๋“ค์€ ์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋น„์œจ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค (Morris et al., 1995). ๋‰ด์งˆ๋žœ๋“œ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ๋‚™๋† ๋†์žฅ์ด ๊ทธ๋“ค์˜ ์œ ์ œํ’ˆ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์— ํ˜œํƒ์„ ์ค„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋Šฆ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค (Crawford et al., 1989Deane, 1993Edwards and Parker, 1994Stantiall and Parker, 1997). ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์—…๋“ค๋„ ์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ ์šฉ๊ณผ ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค (Jasperson et al., 2005). ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ํŠน์ง•์ ์ธ ๋ถ€๋ถ„๋งŒ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„๋“ค์€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค (Davenport, 1998Lyytinen and Hirschheim, 1987Mabert et al., 2001Osterland, 2000Rigby et al., 2002and Ross and Weill 2002). ์ œ 2 ์žฅ์—์„œ ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋†์—…๊ณผ ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ถ•์‚ฐ์—…์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ฑ„ํƒ, ์ž ์žฌ์  ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ์ ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฌธํ—Œ๋“ค์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜์˜ ์ž๋™ํ™”๋œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€์ด๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ›„(ๅพŒ) ์ฑ„ํƒ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์š”์ธ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๋™ํ™”(๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ ์šฉ)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์š”์ธ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. 3 ์žฅ๊ณผ 4 ์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ธ ํ›„(ๅพŒ) ์ฑ„ํƒ๊ณผ ๋™ํ™”(๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ ์šฉ)์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ 3์žฅ์—์„œ, ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ธ ํ•œ๊ตญ์—์„œ ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ›„(ๅพŒ) ์ฑ„ํƒ์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•œ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ์‚ฌ๋ก€๊ฐ€ ๋…ผ์˜๋œ๋‹ค. ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ด์šฉ์ž๋“ค ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋ผ์นœ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ด์šฉ์ž๋“ค๊ณผ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ , ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ , ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์กฐ์ง์  ์š”์†Œ๋“ค์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ๋†์—… ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๋„์ž…์ด ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ๋Šฆ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ์›์ธ๊ณผ ์ข€ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์ „๋ง์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฏธ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‚™๋†์—…์˜ ๋†์žฅ์˜ ๋งค๋‹ˆ์ €๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ํ˜„์žฅ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์งˆ์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ๋†๋ถ€์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ๋” ๊ด€๋ จ์„ฑ์ด ํฌ๋‹ค๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋“์‹ค์„ ๋”ฐ์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ(์‹ ๋ขฐ ๋Œ€ ๊ฒฝ์ œ) ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜คํžˆ๋ ค ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์ข‹์€๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋“ค์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋†๋ถ€๋“ค์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ฒฝ์˜์— ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์ˆ˜๋™์œผ๋กœ ๋†์žฅ์—์„œ ์ƒํ™ฉ๋“ค์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์„ ํ˜ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๋†์žฅ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋‹ค์†Œ ์š”๋ น์œผ๋กœ ๋‚จ์•„์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋†๋ถ€๋“ค์€ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ๊ด€ํ–‰๋“ค์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์„ ํ˜ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋ฐฉํ•ด๊ฐ€ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ๋ก€์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  โ€“ ์กฐ์ง โ€“ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์›Œํฌ (Tornatsky and Fleisher, 1990)๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๊นŠ๊ฒŒ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์คฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ 4์žฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์›Œํฌ์™€ ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ๊ฐ€์„ค๋“ค์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” 16๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ฐ€์„ค๋“ค ์ค‘์—์„œ 11๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•œ ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์ธ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋‚™๋† ๋งค๋‹ˆ์ €์™€ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์—…์ฒด ์ง€์›์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ 4์žฅ์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ ์šฉ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ 4 ์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ฃผ์ œ์ธ, ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๋Š” ์–‘์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ •๋ณด์˜ ์ ์šฉ ๊ณผ์ •์€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ -์กฐ์ง-ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋˜๊ณ , ๊ณผ์ • ์ž๋™ํ™”์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€๊ณผ ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๋™ํ™” ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ๋™ํ™”๊ณผ์ •๊ณผ ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋“ค์€ ๋†์žฅ ์šด์˜ ํ™œ๋™๋“ค, ์ฆ‰ ๊ณผ์ • ์ž๋™ํ™”์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‚˜๋‰œ๋‹ค. ์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ฑ„ํƒ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ๋†์—…๊ณผ ๋‚™๋†์˜ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ํก์ˆ˜(๋™ํ™”)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ฆฌ์ปคํŠธ ํƒ€์ž…์˜ ์„ค๋ฌธ(a Likert-type survey)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์–ด์ง„ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ํ™•์ธ์  ์š”์ธ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ์ตœ์†Œ ์ œ๊ณฑ ๋ฒ•(PLS: partial least square)์„ ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ผ์ƒ ์—…๋ฌด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ธก์ •์€ ๊ณผ์ • ์ž๋™ํ™”์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ํฐ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‚™๋† ์‚ฐ์—…์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜๊ณผ ์—ฐ๋ น์— ๋ถ€์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋†์žฅ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์ถ• ๊ฑด๊ฐ• ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ž๋™ํ™” ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ์šฉ์ด ํ•˜๊ฒŒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋†๋ถ€๋“ค๊ณผ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์กฐ์ง ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์ด ์•ž์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์™ธ๋ถ€์™€์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์™€ ๋†์žฅ์˜ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ผ์ƒ ์—…๋ฌด๋‚˜ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๊ณ„ํš, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ถ•๋“ค์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ• ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ผ๋“ค์ด ๋†์žฅ ์šด์˜์—์„œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ ์šฉ๊ณผ์ •๊ณผ ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ก ์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ๋†์žฅ ์—…๋ฌด์—๋„ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‚™๋†์žฅ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์ถ•๋“ค์˜ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์š”์ธ๋“ค์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์€ ์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ฑ„ํƒ์ด๋‚˜ ๋™ํ™” ๊ณผ์ • ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ž˜ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ง€์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋“ค์ด๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์ œ์–ด: ๋™ํ™”, ๋‚™๋† ๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ, ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ, ์‚ฌํ›„ ์ฑ„ํƒ, ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋†์—…, ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ถ•์‚ฐ์—…, ๊ธฐ์ˆ -์กฐ์ง-ํ™˜๊ฒฝ(TOE) ์ฒด์ œInformation management in the dairy industry is more complex because of the intensification of information systems and the increase in knowledge about animal management, consumer demand for higher quality products, and government regulations. Technology enables precision agriculture (Wang et al., 2006), which obtains effective data in real time (Zhang et al., 2002). Precision livestock farming originates from the increased use of information technology for livestock and dairy management activities (Banhazi et al., 2007Mertens et al., 2011). However, studies indicate that the application of information technology in agricultural production is minimal (Thomas and Callahan, 2002). Farmers did not take advantage of information technology during the 1980s and 1990s (Schmidt et al., 1994). Farmers have shown a low rate of information technology adoption (Morris et al., 1995). Studies in New Zealand indicate that dairy farms have not adopted or have been slow to adopt new technologies that would benefit their milk production (Crawford et al., 1989Stantiall and Parker, 1997). In general, businesses do not utilize the full potential of information technology applications and components (Jasperson et al., 2005). Businesses typically operate at low levels of component use and rarely extend the use of available components that are offered by the technology (Davenport, 1998and Ross and Weill 2002). There are two objectives for this dissertation. The first objective is to investigate factors for the post-adoption of a dairy management information system in South Korea. The second objective is to investigate factors for the assimilation and extended use of a dairy management information system. The first and second objectives are investigated in Chapters 3 and 4. The objectives are applied as two studies that focus on post-adoption and assimilation of information technology used in dairy management. A literature review on precision agriculture and precision livestock farming is also investigated in Chapter 2. Chapter 2 investigates the adoption, potential functions and actual applications of precision agriculture and precision livestock farming. Automated dairy systems are also reviewed. Chapter 3 is an exploratory case study that examines the post-adoption of a dairy management information system in South Korea. We develop a multi-method case study to investigate the influences for adoption by early adopters. Individual adopter and environmental, technological and organizational factors are investigated. The results of this study can provide better insight for why the adoption of a dairy management information system and agricultural information systems in Korea and elsewhere is lagging. The propositions were evaluated using qualitative data collected through on site interviews with dairy managers that have already implemented the system. The study results suggest that environmental conditions appear more relevant than individual characteristics of the farmer. There was a general feeling that technology is a good thing rather than bottom-line profit. Trust is more important than economics. Although farmers adopted the technology, they still prefer to observe conditions on the farm manually. A number of farm processes remained somewhat of an art. Farmers prefer to follow known routines. This relationship may contribute or hinder the adoption of this emerging technology. The results of this case study closely follow and are linked to the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework (Tornatsky and Fleisher, 1990). The results of the study were a set of propositions and general framework, which lead to Chapter 4. We were able to support eleven of sixteen propositions. This is the first exploratory, multi-method case study to look at a dairy management information system in South Korea. The study further provides a better understanding of the relationship between dairy managers and vendor support. We investigate factors that affect assimilation and extended use of a dairy management information system in Chapter 4. Chapter 4 is a quantitative study that examines the assimilation and extended use of an information system used in dairy management. We initially investigate this study through the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework. The theoretical model proceeds through two assimilation and extended use stages. The first stage is farm operational activities. These farm operational activities are daily operations, production planning and herd health management. The second stage is the level of process automation. There are many studies that are concerned with the adoption of information technology. There have rarely been studies on assimilation of information technology from an agricultural and dairy context. The study utilizes data collected through a Likert-type survey. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and partial least squares for hypothesis testing are performed. Results indicate that measures for daily operations have a significant effect on the level of process automation. This effect is negatively impacted by the years of dairy industry experience. There is also evidence that farm size can facilitate information system assimilation and extended use to automate herd health management. Social influences such as other farmers and other support services outside the organization can affect future use of the system. The system can also improve outside relationships and farm image. These factors facilitate the assimilation and extended use of the system in farm operational activities. The study introduces an information systems framework and demonstrates its applicability to extended farm operational activities from a theoretical perspective. The study also introduces a new component that involves biological phases of a domesticated animal in a dairy farm environment. This biological component is rarely seen in information technology adoption and assimilation research.Chapter 1: Overview 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Problem Statement 2 1.3 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises 3 1.4 Dissertation Objectives and Research Questions 5 1.5 Organization of the Dissertation 6 Chapter 2: Literature Review 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 The Agricultural Technology Revolution 10 2.3 Precision Agriculture 10 2.3.1 Awareness and Adoption of Precision Agriculture 10 2.3.2 Barriers to Adopt and Automate Precision Agriculture 11 2.3.3 Precision Agriculture Applications 13 2.4 Precision Livestock Farming 15 2.4.1 Information Systems in Dairy Management 15 2.4.2 Potential Functions of Precision Livestock Farming 15 2.4.3 Adoption of Precision Livestock Farming 17 2.4.4 Applications of Precision Livestock Farming 18 2.5 Automatic Agricultural Systems 19 2.6 Automatic Milking Systems 24 2.7 Summary 26 Chapter 3: Factors Affecting Adoption of a Dairy Management Information System: An Exploratory Case Study 27 3.1 Introduction 27 3.1.1 Statement of the Problem 28 3.1.2 Significance of the Study 30 3.1.3 Purpose of the Study 31 3.1.4 Research Question 32 3.2 Literature Review 33 3.2.1 Adoption of Information Technology in Agriculture 33 3.2.2 Adoption of Information Technology in Dairy 35 3.2.3 Innovation Diffusion Theory 36 3.3 Theoretical Model and Propositions 38 3.3.1 Adopter characteristics 40 3.3.2 Environment Context 44 3.3.3 Technology Context 46 3.3.4 Organization Context 49 3.4 Methodology 52 3.4.1 Case Study Research Methodology 52 3.4.2 Ethics of Survey Research 56 3.4.3 Study and Interview Permission 57 3.4.4 Research Method 57 3.4.5 Survey Population 59 3.4.6 Sampling Method 59 3.4.7 Sample Validity and Representative Sample 60 3.4.8 Survey Instrument 60 3.4.9 The Dairy Management Information System 61 3.5 Analysis 62 3.5.1 Farm Size 63 3.5.2 Experience 63 3.5.3 Age 64 3.5.4 Education 65 3.5.5 Social Influences 65 3.5.6 Sponsorship 66 3.5.7 Information Sharing 67 3.5.8 Dealer Trust 68 3.5.9 Relative Advantage 68 3.5.10 Knowledge 68 3.5.11 Compatibility 69 3.5.12 Planning 69 3.5.13 Complexity 70 3.5.14 Profitability 71 3.5.15 Cash Flow/Financial Resources 72 3.5.16 Risk-taking/Uncertainty 72 3.6 Research Model Results 74 3.7 Discussion 76 3.7.1 Research Question 76 3.7.2 Findings 76 3.8 Study Limitations and Future Research 79 3.8.1 Theoretical Contributions 81 3.8.2 Practical Contributions 82 3.9 Conclusions 82 Chapter 4: Factors Affecting Assimilation of a Dairy Management Information System: A Quantitative Study 84 4.1 Introduction 84 4.1.2 Problem Statement 85 4.1.3 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises 85 4.1.4 Significance of the Study 87 4.1.5 Intent of the Study and Research Questions 87 4.1.6 Limitations 89 4.1.7 Delimitations 90 4.1.8 Assumptions 91 4.1.9 Organization of the Study 91 4.2 Theoretical Background 92 4.2.1 Adoption-Infusion Process 92 4.2.2 Assimilation Process 93 4.2.3 Technology-Organization-Environment Framework 93 4.2.4 Assimilation 98 4.2.5 Extended Use of Information Technology 100 4.2.6 Dairy Management Activities 102 4.2.7 Dairy Farm Supply Chain 105 4.2.6 Milk Production Cycle 106 4.3 Hypotheses and Model Development 107 4.3.1 Theoretical Model 108 4.3.2 Level of Process Automation 110 4.3.3 Moderator Effects 113 4.3.4 System Complexity 114 4.3.5 System Compatibility 116 4.3.6 Organization Competence 117 4.3.7 Perceived Benefits 119 4.3.8 Social Influences 120 4.3.9 Cooperative Support 121 4.3.10 Control Variables 123 4.3.11 Study Hypotheses 124 4.4 Research Methodology 126 4.4.1 Ethics of Survey Research 126 4.4.2 Study and Survey Permission 127 4.4.3 Research Method 127 4.4.4 Validity of Research Questions and Survey 127 4.4.5 Survey Population 128 4.4.6 Sampling Method 128 4.4.7 Sample Validity 128 4.4.8 Representative Sample 129 4.4.9 The Survey Instrument 129 4.4.10 Dairy Management Information System 131 4.4.11 Operationalization and Validation 132 4.4.12 Descriptive Analysis 134 4.5 Analysis and Results 137 4.5.1 Statistical Tools 137 4.5.2 Measurement Model 139 4.5.3 Hypotheses Testing 144 4.6 Discussion 152 4.6.1 Process Automation 155 4.6.2 Moderator Variables 156 4.6.3 Daily Operations 157 4.6.4 Production Planning 158 4.6.5 Herd Health Management 159 4.6.6 Control Variables 160 4.6.7 Implications 160 4.7 Limitations and Future Research 163 4.8 Conclusions 164 Chapter 5: Conclusions 166 References 171 Appendices 208 Appendix A. List of Abbreviations 208 Appendix B. Case Study Open-Ended Interview Questions 209 Appendix C. Dairy Management Information System Components 209 Appendix D-1. English Survey Questionnaire 211 Appendix D-2. Taiwanese/Chinese Survey Questionnaire 213 Appendix D-3. Korean Survey Questionnaire 215 Appendix E. Farmers Comments 217 Abstract in Korean 219Docto

    Faculty Publications & Presentations, 2007-2008

    Get PDF

    Recent researches on social sciences

    Get PDF
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore