A Closer Look at HMAC

Bellare, Canetti and Krawczyk~\cite{FOCS:BelCanKra96} show that cascading an \eps-secure (fixed input length) PRF gives an O(\eps n q)-secure (variable input length) PRF when making at most $q$ prefix-free queries of length $n$ blocks. We observe that this translates to the same bound for NMAC (which is the cascade without the prefix-free requirement but an additional application of the PRF at the end), and give a matching attack, showing this bound is tight. This contradicts the O(\eps n) bound claimed by Koblitz and Menezes~\cite{KobMen12}

Про нові потоковi алгоритми створення чутливих дайджестiв електронних документів

Для прийняття обґрунтованих планових рішень у суспільно-економічній сфері спеціалісти повинні користуватися перевіреними документами. До засобів перевірки документів належать криптографічно стабільні алгоритми компресії великого файлу в дайджест визначеного розміру, чутливий до будь-якої зміни символів на вході. Пропонуються нові швидкі алгоритми компресії, криптографічна стабільність яких пов’язується зі складними алгебраїчними проблемами, такими як дослідження систем алгебраїчних рівнянь великої степені та задача розкладу нелінійного відображення простору за твірними. Запропоновані алгоритми створення чутливих до змін дайджестів документів будуть використані для виявлення кібератак та аудиту усіх файлів системи після зареєстрованого втручання.Specialists must use well checked documents to elaborate well founded,decisions and plans in the socio-economic field. Check tools include cryptographically stable algorithms for compressing a large file into a digest of a specified size, sensitive to any change in the characters on the input. New fast compression algorithms are proposed, whose cryptographic stability is associated with complex algebraic problems, such as the study of systems of algebraic equations of large power and the problem of the expansion of nonlinear mapping of space by generators. The proposed algorithms for creation of change-sensitive digests will be used to detect cyberattacks and audit all system files after a registered intervention

On the security of the WOTS-PRF signature scheme

We identify a flaw in the security proof and a flaw in the concrete security analysis of the WOTS-PRF variant of the Winternitz one-time signature scheme, and discuss the implications to its concrete security

LNCS

NMAC is a mode of operation which turns a fixed input-length keyed hash function f into a variable input-length function. A practical single-key variant of NMAC called HMAC is a very popular and widely deployed message authentication code (MAC). Security proofs and attacks for NMAC can typically be lifted to HMAC. NMAC was introduced by Bellare, Canetti and Krawczyk [Crypto'96], who proved it to be a secure pseudorandom function (PRF), and thus also a MAC, assuming that (1) f is a PRF and (2) the function we get when cascading f is weakly collision-resistant. Unfortunately, HMAC is typically instantiated with cryptographic hash functions like MD5 or SHA-1 for which (2) has been found to be wrong. To restore the provable guarantees for NMAC, Bellare [Crypto'06] showed its security based solely on the assumption that f is a PRF, albeit via a non-uniform reduction. - Our first contribution is a simpler and uniform proof for this fact: If f is an ε-secure PRF (against q queries) and a δ-non-adaptively secure PRF (against q queries), then NMAC f is an (ε+ℓqδ)-secure PRF against q queries of length at most ℓ blocks each. - We then show that this ε+ℓqδ bound is basically tight. For the most interesting case where ℓqδ ≥ ε we prove this by constructing an f for which an attack with advantage ℓqδ exists. This also violates the bound O(ℓε) on the PRF-security of NMAC recently claimed by Koblitz and Menezes. - Finally, we analyze the PRF-security of a modification of NMAC called NI [An and Bellare, Crypto'99] that differs mainly by using a compression function with an additional keying input. This avoids the constant rekeying on multi-block messages in NMAC and allows for a security proof starting by the standard switch from a PRF to a random function, followed by an information-theoretic analysis. We carry out such an analysis, obtaining a tight ℓq2/2 c bound for this step, improving over the trivial bound of ℓ2q2/2c. The proof borrows combinatorial techniques originally developed for proving the security of CBC-MAC [Bellare et al., Crypto'05]

Multi-Key Security: The Even-Mansour Construction Revisited

At ASIACRYPT 1991, Even and Mansour introduced a block cipher construction based on a single permutation. Their construction has since been lauded for its simplicity, yet also criticized for not providing the same security as other block ciphers against generic attacks. In this paper, we prove that if a small number of plaintexts are encrypted under multiple independent keys, the Even-Mansour construction surprisingly offers similar security as an ideal block cipher with the same block and key size. Note that this multi-key setting is of high practical relevance, as real-world implementations often allow frequent rekeying. We hope that the results in this paper will further encourage the use of the Even-Mansour construction, especially when the secure and efficient implementation of a key schedule would result in a significant overhead

Multi-key Security: The Even-Mansour Construction Revisited

International audienceAt ASIACRYPT 1991, Even and Mansour introduced a block cipher construction based on a single permutation. Their construction has since been lauded for its simplicity, yet also criticized for not providing the same security as other block ciphers against generic attacks. In this paper, we prove that if a small number of plaintexts are encrypted under multiple independent keys, the Even-Mansour construction surprisingly offers similar security as an ideal block cipher with the same block and key size. Note that this multi-key setting is of high practical relevance, as real-world implementations often allow frequent rekeying. We hope that the results in this paper will further encourage the use of the Even-Mansour construction, especially when a secure and efficient implementation of a key schedule would result in significant overhead

Keyed Streebog is a secure PRF and MAC

One of the most popular ways to turn a keyless hash function into a keyed one is the HMAC algorithm. This approach is too expensive in some cases due to double hashing. Excessive overhead can sometimes be avoided by using certain features of the hash function itself. The paper presents a simple and safe way to create a keyed cryptoalgorithm (conventionally called Streebog-K ) from hash function Streebog $\mathsf{H}(M)$. Let $K$ be a secret key, then $\mathsf{KH}(K,M)=\mathsf{H}(K||M)$ is a secure pseudorandom function (PRF) and, therefore, a good message authentification code (MAC). The proof is obtained by reduction of the security of the presented construction to the resistance of the underlying compression function to the related key attacks (PRF-RKA). The security bounds of Streebog-K are essentially the same as those of HMAC-Streebog, but the computing speed doubles when short messages are used

About “kk-bit security” of MACs based on hash function Streebog

Various message authentication codes (MACs), including HMAC-Streebog and Streebog-K, are based on the keyless hash function Streebog. Under the assumption that the compression function of Streebog is resistant to the related key attacks, the security proofs of these algorithms were recently presented at CTCrypt 2022. We carefully detail the resources of the adversary in the related key settings, revisit the proof, and obtain tight security bounds. Let $n$ be the bit length of the hash function state. If the amount of processed data is less than about $2^{n-k}$ blocks, then for HMAC-Streebog-512 and Streebog-K, the only effective method of forgery (or distinguishing) is guessing the $k$-bit secret key or the tag if it is shorter than the key. So, we can speak about ``$k$-bit security\u27\u27 without specifying the amount of material, if the key length is no longer than half of a state. The bound for HMAC-Streebog-256 is worse and equal to $2^{\frac{n}{2}-k}$ blocks

Another Look at Security Theorems for 1-Key Nested MACs

We prove a security theorem without collision-resistance for a class of 1-key hash-function-based MAC schemes that includes HMAC and Envelope MAC. The proof has some advantages over earlier proofs: it is in the uniform model, it uses a weaker related-key assumption, and it covers a broad class of MACs in a single theorem. However, we also explain why our theorem is of doubtful value in assessing the real-world security of these MAC schemes. In addition, we prove a theorem assuming collision-resistance. From these two theorems we conclude that from a provable security standpoint there is little reason to prefer HMAC to Envelope MAC or similar schemes

LNCS

This paper studies the concrete security of PRFs and MACs obtained by keying hash functions based on the sponge paradigm. One such hash function is KECCAK, selected as NIST’s new SHA-3 standard. In contrast to other approaches like HMAC, the exact security of keyed sponges is not well understood. Indeed, recent security analyses delivered concrete security bounds which are far from existing attacks. This paper aims to close this gap. We prove (nearly) exact bounds on the concrete PRF security of keyed sponges using a random permutation. These bounds are tight for the most relevant ranges of parameters, i.e., for messages of length (roughly) l ≤ min{2n/4, 2r} blocks, where n is the state size and r is the desired output length; and for l ≤ q queries (to the construction or the underlying permutation). Moreover, we also improve standard-model bounds. As an intermediate step of independent interest, we prove tight bounds on the PRF security of the truncated CBC-MAC construction, which operates as plain CBC-MAC, but only returns a prefix of the output