Analysis of autopilot disengagements occurring during autonomous vehicle testing

In present-day highly-automated vehicles, there are occasions when the driving system disengages and the human driver is required to take-over. This is of great importance to a vehicle U+02BC s safety and ride comfort. In the U.S state of California, the Autonomous Vehicle Testing Regulations require every manufacturer testing autonomous vehicles on public roads to submit an annual report summarizing the disengagements of the technology experienced during testing. On 1 January 2016, seven manufacturers submitted their first disengagement reports: Bosch, Delphi, Google, Nissan, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, and Tesla Motors. This work analyses the data from these disengagement reports with the aim of gaining abetter understanding of the situations in which a driver is required to takeover, as this is potentially useful in improving the Society of Automotive Engineers U+0028 SAE U+0029 Level 2 and Level 3 automation technologies. Disengagement events from testing are classified into different groups based on attributes and the causes of disengagement are investigated and compared in detail. The mechanisms and time taken for take-over transition occurred in disengagements are studied. Finally, recommendations for OEMs, manufacturers, and government organizations are also discussed

Characterization of driver neuromuscular dynamics for human-automation collaboration design of automated vehicles

In order to design an advanced human-automation collaboration system for highly automated vehicles, research into the driver's neuromuscular dynamics is needed. In this paper a dynamic model of drivers' neuromuscular interaction with a steering wheel is firstly established. The transfer function and the natural frequency of the systems are analyzed. In order to identify the key parameters of the driver-steering-wheel interacting system and investigate the system properties under different situations, experiments with driver-in-the-loop are carried out. For each test subject, two steering tasks, namely the passive and active steering tasks, are instructed to be completed. Furthermore, during the experiments, subjects manipulated the steering wheel with two distinct postures and three different hand positions. Based on the experimental results, key parameters of the transfer function model are identified by using the Gauss-Newton algorithm. Based on the estimated model with identified parameters, investigation of system properties is then carried out. The characteristics of the driver neuromuscular system are discussed and compared with respect to different steering tasks, hand positions and driver postures. These experimental results with identified system properties provide a good foundation for the development of a haptic take-over control system for automated vehicles

Framework for Data Acquisition and Fusion of Camera and Radar for Autonomous Vehicle Systems

The primary contribution is the development of the data collection testing methodology for autonomous driving systems of a hybrid electric passenger vehicle. As automotive manufacturers begin to develop adaptive cruise control technology in vehicles, progress is being made toward the development of fully-autonomous vehicles. Adaptive cruise control capability is classified into five levels defined by the Society of Automotive Engineering. Some vehicles under development have attained higher levels of autonomy, but the focus of most commercial development is Level 2 autonomy. As the level of autonomy increases, the sensor technology becomes more advanced with a sensor suite which includes radar, camera, and vehicle-to-everything radio. Sensors must detect the objects around the vehicle to be able for communicate the data to the adaptive cruise control algorithm. If a vehicle is in an accident, the driver is typically responsible for the damages, but with an autonomous vehicle, there might not be a driver. A process to guarantee a vehicle will perform as it was developed is critical to a vehicle’s development and testing. The goal of this work is to implement a verification and validation system that can be used on adaptive cruise control systems. The system developed in this paper used different testing environments such as model-in-the-loop, hardware-in-the-loop, and vehicle-in-the-loop, to fully validate an autonomous vehicle. A systematic data acquisition process has been developed to support autonomous vehicle development. The data that was taken had an organized way of comparing the results in each environment. Requirements management, vehicle logbook, and test case creation played a vital role in combining the information across the environments. The method produced a consumer-ready adaptive cruise control system in a 2019 Chevrolet Blazer RS. The vehicle was able to perform at an Advanced Vehicle Technology Competition where the adaptive cruise control system placed 1st in Connected and Automated Vehicle Perception System & Adaptive Cruise Control Drive Quality Evaluation. Results are presented that illustrate the utility of the data acquisition and multi-layer testing process for autonomous vehicle development

Why do drivers and automation disengage the automation? Results from a study among Tesla users

A better understanding of automation disengagements can impact the safety and efficiency of automated systems. This study investigates the factors contributing to driver- and system-initiated disengagements by analyzing semi-structured interviews with 103 users of Tesla's Autopilot and FSD Beta. Through an examination of the data, main categories and sub-categories of disengagements were identified, which led to the development of a triadic model of automation disengagements. The model treats automation and human operators as equivalent agents. It suggests that human operators disengage automation when they anticipate failure, observe unnatural or unwanted automation behavior (e.g., erratic steering, running red lights), or believe the automation is not suited for certain environments (e.g., inclement weather, non-standard roads). Human operators' negative experiences, such as frustration, feelings of unsafety, and distrust, are also incorporated into the model, as these emotions can be triggered by (anticipated) automation behaviors. The automation, in turn, monitors human operators and may disengage itself if it detects insufficient vigilance or traffic rule violations. Moreover, human operators can be influenced by the reactions of passengers and other road users, leading them to disengage automation if they sense discomfort, anger, or embarrassment due to the system's actions. This research offers insights into the factors contributing to automation disengagements, highlighting not only the concerns of human operators but also the social aspects of the phenomenon. Furthermore, the findings provide information on potential edge cases of automated vehicle technology, which may help to enhance the safety and efficiency of such systems.Comment: 51 pages, 1 figur