9 research outputs found
Analysis of nonlinear constraints in CLP(R)
Solving nonlinear constraints over real numbers is a complex problem. Hence constraint logic programming languages like CLP(R) or Prolog III solve only linear constraints and delay nonlinear constraints until they become linear. This efficient implementation method has the disadvantage that sometimes computed answers are unsatisfiable or infinite loops occur due to the unsatisfiability of delayed nonlinear constraints. These problems could be solved by using a more powerful constraint solver which can deal with nonlinear constraints like in RISC-CLP(Real). Since such powerful constraint solvers are not very efficient, we propose a compromise between these two extremes. We characterize a class of CLP(R) programs for which all delayed nonlinear constraints become linear at run time. Programs belonging to this class can be safely executed with the efficient CLP(R) method while the remaining programs need a more powerful constraint solver
Automatic optimization of dynamic scheduling in logic programs
Abstract is not available
A practical approach to the global analysis of CLP programs
This paper presents and illustrates with an example a practical approach to the dataflow analysis of programs written in constraint logic programming (CLP) languages using abstract interpretation. It is first argued that,
from the framework point of view, it sufnces to propose relatively simple extensions of traditional analysis methods which have already been proved useful and practical and for which efncient fixpoint algorithms have been
developed. This is shown by proposing a simple but quite general extensión of Bruynooghe's traditional framework to the analysis of CLP programs. In this extensión constraints are viewed not as "suspended goals" but rather as new information in the store, following the traditional view of CLP. Using this approach, and as an example of its use, a complete, constraint system independent, abstract analysis is presented for approximating definiteness information. The analysis is in fact of quite general applicability. It has been implemented and used in the analysis of CLP(R) and Prolog-III applications. Results from the implementation of this analysis are also presented
Analyzing logic programs with dynamic scheduling
Traditional logic programming languages, such as Prolog, use a fixed left-to-right atom scheduling rule. Recent logic programming languages, however, usually provide more flexible scheduling in which computation generally proceeds leftto- right but in which some calis are dynamically
"delayed" until their arguments are sufRciently instantiated
to allow the cali to run efficiently. Such dynamic scheduling has a significant cost. We give a framework for the global analysis of logic programming languages with dynamic scheduling and show that program analysis based on this framework supports optimizations which remove much
of the overhead of dynamic scheduling
Optimization of logic programs with dynamic scheduling
Dynamic scheduling increases the expressive power of logic programming languages, but also introduces some overhead. In this paper we present two classes of program transformations designed to reduce this additional overhead, while preserving the operational semantics of the original programs, modulo ordering of literals woken at the same time. The first class of transformations simplifies the delay conditions while the second class moves delayed literals later in the rule body. Application of the program transformations can be automated using information provided by compile-time analysis. We provide experimental results obtained from an implementation of the proposed techniques using the CIAO prototype compiler. Our results show that the techniques can lead to substantial performance improvement
Compile-time analysis of nonlinear constraints in CLP(R)
Solving nonlinear constraints over real numbers is a complex problem.
Hence constraint logic programming languages like CLP() or Prolog III
solve only linear constraints and delay nonlinear constraints
until they become linear. This efficient implementation method
has the disadvantage that sometimes computed answers are unsatisfiable
or infinite loops occur due to the unsatisfiability of delayed
nonlinear constraints. These problems could be solved by using
a more powerful constraint solver which can deal with nonlinear
constraints like in RISC-CLP(Real). Since such powerful constraint
solvers are not very efficient, we propose a compromise between
these two extremes. We characterize a class of CLP() programs
for which all delayed nonlinear constraints become linear at run time.
Programs belonging to this class can be safely executed with the
efficient CLP() method while the remaining programs need a
more powerful constraint solver