29,281 research outputs found

    Minimum-Cost Coverage of Point Sets by Disks

    Full text link
    We consider a class of geometric facility location problems in which the goal is to determine a set X of disks given by their centers (t_j) and radii (r_j) that cover a given set of demand points Y in the plane at the smallest possible cost. We consider cost functions of the form sum_j f(r_j), where f(r)=r^alpha is the cost of transmission to radius r. Special cases arise for alpha=1 (sum of radii) and alpha=2 (total area); power consumption models in wireless network design often use an exponent alpha>2. Different scenarios arise according to possible restrictions on the transmission centers t_j, which may be constrained to belong to a given discrete set or to lie on a line, etc. We obtain several new results, including (a) exact and approximation algorithms for selecting transmission points t_j on a given line in order to cover demand points Y in the plane; (b) approximation algorithms (and an algebraic intractability result) for selecting an optimal line on which to place transmission points to cover Y; (c) a proof of NP-hardness for a discrete set of transmission points in the plane and any fixed alpha>1; and (d) a polynomial-time approximation scheme for the problem of computing a minimum cost covering tour (MCCT), in which the total cost is a linear combination of the transmission cost for the set of disks and the length of a tour/path that connects the centers of the disks.Comment: 10 pages, 4 figures, Latex, to appear in ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry 200

    A Constant-Factor Approximation for Multi-Covering with Disks

    Full text link
    We consider variants of the following multi-covering problem with disks. We are given two point sets YY (servers) and XX (clients) in the plane, a coverage function κ:XN\kappa :X \rightarrow \mathcal{N}, and a constant α1\alpha \geq 1. Centered at each server is a single disk whose radius we are free to set. The requirement is that each client xXx \in X be covered by at least κ(x)\kappa(x) of the server disks. The objective function we wish to minimize is the sum of the α\alpha-th powers of the disk radii. We present a polynomial time algorithm for this problem achieving an O(1)O(1) approximation

    Approximate Clustering via Metric Partitioning

    Get PDF
    In this paper we consider two metric covering/clustering problems - \textit{Minimum Cost Covering Problem} (MCC) and kk-clustering. In the MCC problem, we are given two point sets XX (clients) and YY (servers), and a metric on XYX \cup Y. We would like to cover the clients by balls centered at the servers. The objective function to minimize is the sum of the α\alpha-th power of the radii of the balls. Here α1\alpha \geq 1 is a parameter of the problem (but not of a problem instance). MCC is closely related to the kk-clustering problem. The main difference between kk-clustering and MCC is that in kk-clustering one needs to select kk balls to cover the clients. For any \eps > 0, we describe quasi-polynomial time (1 + \eps) approximation algorithms for both of the problems. However, in case of kk-clustering the algorithm uses (1 + \eps)k balls. Prior to our work, a 3α3^{\alpha} and a cα{c}^{\alpha} approximation were achieved by polynomial-time algorithms for MCC and kk-clustering, respectively, where c>1c > 1 is an absolute constant. These two problems are thus interesting examples of metric covering/clustering problems that admit (1 + \eps)-approximation (using (1+\eps)k balls in case of kk-clustering), if one is willing to settle for quasi-polynomial time. In contrast, for the variant of MCC where α\alpha is part of the input, we show under standard assumptions that no polynomial time algorithm can achieve an approximation factor better than O(logX)O(\log |X|) for αlogX\alpha \geq \log |X|.Comment: 19 page
    corecore