9 research outputs found

    A simple and optimal ancestry labeling scheme for trees

    Full text link
    We present a lgn+2lglgn+3\lg n + 2 \lg \lg n+3 ancestry labeling scheme for trees. The problem was first presented by Kannan et al. [STOC 88'] along with a simple 2lgn2 \lg n solution. Motivated by applications to XML files, the label size was improved incrementally over the course of more than 20 years by a series of papers. The last, due to Fraigniaud and Korman [STOC 10'], presented an asymptotically optimal lgn+4lglgn+O(1)\lg n + 4 \lg \lg n+O(1) labeling scheme using non-trivial tree-decomposition techniques. By providing a framework generalizing interval based labeling schemes, we obtain a simple, yet asymptotically optimal solution to the problem. Furthermore, our labeling scheme is attained by a small modification of the original 2lgn2 \lg n solution.Comment: 12 pages, 1 figure. To appear at ICALP'1

    Dynamic and Multi-functional Labeling Schemes

    Full text link
    We investigate labeling schemes supporting adjacency, ancestry, sibling, and connectivity queries in forests. In the course of more than 20 years, the existence of logn+O(loglog)\log n + O(\log \log) labeling schemes supporting each of these functions was proven, with the most recent being ancestry [Fraigniaud and Korman, STOC '10]. Several multi-functional labeling schemes also enjoy lower or upper bounds of logn+Ω(loglogn)\log n + \Omega(\log \log n) or logn+O(loglogn)\log n + O(\log \log n) respectively. Notably an upper bound of logn+5loglogn\log n + 5\log \log n for adjacency+siblings and a lower bound of logn+loglogn\log n + \log \log n for each of the functions siblings, ancestry, and connectivity [Alstrup et al., SODA '03]. We improve the constants hidden in the OO-notation. In particular we show a logn+2loglogn\log n + 2\log \log n lower bound for connectivity+ancestry and connectivity+siblings, as well as an upper bound of logn+3loglogn+O(logloglogn)\log n + 3\log \log n + O(\log \log \log n) for connectivity+adjacency+siblings by altering existing methods. In the context of dynamic labeling schemes it is known that ancestry requires Ω(n)\Omega(n) bits [Cohen, et al. PODS '02]. In contrast, we show upper and lower bounds on the label size for adjacency, siblings, and connectivity of 2logn2\log n bits, and 3logn3 \log n to support all three functions. There exist efficient adjacency labeling schemes for planar, bounded treewidth, bounded arboricity and interval graphs. In a dynamic setting, we show a lower bound of Ω(n)\Omega(n) for each of those families.Comment: 17 pages, 5 figure

    Distance labeling schemes for trees

    Get PDF
    We consider distance labeling schemes for trees: given a tree with nn nodes, label the nodes with binary strings such that, given the labels of any two nodes, one can determine, by looking only at the labels, the distance in the tree between the two nodes. A lower bound by Gavoille et. al. (J. Alg. 2004) and an upper bound by Peleg (J. Graph Theory 2000) establish that labels must use Θ(log2n)\Theta(\log^2 n) bits\footnote{Throughout this paper we use log\log for log2\log_2.}. Gavoille et. al. (ESA 2001) show that for very small approximate stretch, labels use Θ(lognloglogn)\Theta(\log n \log \log n) bits. Several other papers investigate various variants such as, for example, small distances in trees (Alstrup et. al., SODA'03). We improve the known upper and lower bounds of exact distance labeling by showing that 14log2n\frac{1}{4} \log^2 n bits are needed and that 12log2n\frac{1}{2} \log^2 n bits are sufficient. We also give (1+ϵ1+\epsilon)-stretch labeling schemes using Θ(logn)\Theta(\log n) bits for constant ϵ>0\epsilon>0. (1+ϵ1+\epsilon)-stretch labeling schemes with polylogarithmic label size have previously been established for doubling dimension graphs by Talwar (STOC 2004). In addition, we present matching upper and lower bounds for distance labeling for caterpillars, showing that labels must have size 2lognΘ(loglogn)2\log n - \Theta(\log\log n). For simple paths with kk nodes and edge weights in [1,n][1,n], we show that labels must have size k1klogn+Θ(logk)\frac{k-1}{k}\log n+\Theta(\log k)

    Near-optimal labeling schemes for nearest common ancestors

    Full text link
    We consider NCA labeling schemes: given a rooted tree TT, label the nodes of TT with binary strings such that, given the labels of any two nodes, one can determine, by looking only at the labels, the label of their nearest common ancestor. For trees with nn nodes we present upper and lower bounds establishing that labels of size (2±ϵ)logn(2\pm \epsilon)\log n, ϵ<1\epsilon<1 are both sufficient and necessary. (All logarithms in this paper are in base 2.) Alstrup, Bille, and Rauhe (SIDMA'05) showed that ancestor and NCA labeling schemes have labels of size logn+Ω(loglogn)\log n +\Omega(\log \log n). Our lower bound increases this to logn+Ω(logn)\log n + \Omega(\log n) for NCA labeling schemes. Since Fraigniaud and Korman (STOC'10) established that labels in ancestor labeling schemes have size logn+Θ(loglogn)\log n +\Theta(\log \log n), our new lower bound separates ancestor and NCA labeling schemes. Our upper bound improves the 10logn10 \log n upper bound by Alstrup, Gavoille, Kaplan and Rauhe (TOCS'04), and our theoretical result even outperforms some recent experimental studies by Fischer (ESA'09) where variants of the same NCA labeling scheme are shown to all have labels of size approximately 8logn8 \log n

    Simpler, faster and shorter labels for distances in graphs

    Full text link
    We consider how to assign labels to any undirected graph with n nodes such that, given the labels of two nodes and no other information regarding the graph, it is possible to determine the distance between the two nodes. The challenge in such a distance labeling scheme is primarily to minimize the maximum label lenght and secondarily to minimize the time needed to answer distance queries (decoding). Previous schemes have offered different trade-offs between label lengths and query time. This paper presents a simple algorithm with shorter labels and shorter query time than any previous solution, thereby improving the state-of-the-art with respect to both label length and query time in one single algorithm. Our solution addresses several open problems concerning label length and decoding time and is the first improvement of label length for more than three decades. More specifically, we present a distance labeling scheme with label size (log 3)/2 + o(n) (logarithms are in base 2) and O(1) decoding time. This outperforms all existing results with respect to both size and decoding time, including Winkler's (Combinatorica 1983) decade-old result, which uses labels of size (log 3)n and O(n/log n) decoding time, and Gavoille et al. (SODA'01), which uses labels of size 11n + o(n) and O(loglog n) decoding time. In addition, our algorithm is simpler than the previous ones. In the case of integral edge weights of size at most W, we present almost matching upper and lower bounds for label sizes. For r-additive approximation schemes, where distances can be off by an additive constant r, we give both upper and lower bounds. In particular, we present an upper bound for 1-additive approximation schemes which, in the unweighted case, has the same size (ignoring second order terms) as an adjacency scheme: n/2. We also give results for bipartite graphs and for exact and 1-additive distance oracles

    Adjacency labeling schemes and induced-universal graphs

    Full text link
    We describe a way of assigning labels to the vertices of any undirected graph on up to nn vertices, each composed of n/2+O(1)n/2+O(1) bits, such that given the labels of two vertices, and no other information regarding the graph, it is possible to decide whether or not the vertices are adjacent in the graph. This is optimal, up to an additive constant, and constitutes the first improvement in almost 50 years of an n/2+O(logn)n/2+O(\log n) bound of Moon. As a consequence, we obtain an induced-universal graph for nn-vertex graphs containing only O(2n/2)O(2^{n/2}) vertices, which is optimal up to a multiplicative constant, solving an open problem of Vizing from 1968. We obtain similar tight results for directed graphs, tournaments and bipartite graphs

    Shorter Labeling Schemes for Planar Graphs

    Get PDF
    An \emph{adjacency labeling scheme} for a given class of graphs is an algorithm that for every graph GG from the class, assigns bit strings (labels) to vertices of GG so that for any two vertices u,vu,v, whether uu and vv are adjacent can be determined by a fixed procedure that examines only their labels. It is known that planar graphs with nn vertices admit a labeling scheme with labels of bit length (2+o(1))logn(2+o(1))\log{n}. In this work we improve this bound by designing a labeling scheme with labels of bit length (43+o(1))logn(\frac{4}{3}+o(1))\log{n}. In graph-theoretical terms, this implies an explicit construction of a graph on n4/3+o(1)n^{4/3+o(1)} vertices that contains all planar graphs on nn vertices as induced subgraphs, improving the previous best upper bound of n2+o(1)n^{2+o(1)}. Our scheme generalizes to graphs of bounded Euler genus with the same label length up to a second-order term. All the labels of the input graph can be computed in polynomial time, while adjacency can be decided from the labels in constant time

    An Optimal Ancestry Scheme and Small Universal Posets

    No full text
    In this paper, we solve the ancestry problem, which was introduced more than twenty years ago by Kannan et al. [STOC ’88], and is among the most well-studied problems in the field of informative labeling schemes. Specifically, we construct an ancestry labeling scheme for n-node trees with label size log 2 n + O(log log n) bits, thus matching the log 2 n + Ω(log log n) bits lower bound given by Alstrup et al. [SODA ’03]. Besides its optimal label size, our scheme assigns the labels in linear time, and guarantees that any ancestry query can be answered in constant time. In addition to its potential impact in terms of improving the performances of XML search engines, our ancestry scheme is also useful in the context of partially ordered sets. Specifically, for any fixed integer k, our scheme enables the construction of a universal poset of size O(n k log 4k n) for the family of n-element posets with tree-dimension at most k. This bound is almost tight thanks to a lower bound of n k−o(1) due to Alon and Scheinerman [Order ’88]
    corecore