11 research outputs found

    An Extensible Benchmarking Infrastructure for Motion Planning Algorithms

    Full text link
    Sampling-based planning algorithms are the most common probabilistically complete algorithms and are widely used on many robot platforms. Within this class of algorithms, many variants have been proposed over the last 20 years, yet there is still no characterization of which algorithms are well-suited for which classes of problems. This has motivated us to develop a benchmarking infrastructure for motion planning algorithms. It consists of three main components. First, we have created an extensive benchmarking software framework that is included with the Open Motion Planning Library (OMPL), a C++ library that contains implementations of many sampling-based algorithms. Second, we have defined extensible formats for storing benchmark results. The formats are fairly straightforward so that other planning libraries could easily produce compatible output. Finally, we have created an interactive, versatile visualization tool for compact presentation of collected benchmark data. The tool and underlying database facilitate the analysis of performance across benchmark problems and planners.Comment: Submitted to IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine (Special Issue on Replicable and Measurable Robotics Research), 201

    An Asymptotically-Optimal Sampling-Based Algorithm for Bi-directional Motion Planning

    Full text link
    Bi-directional search is a widely used strategy to increase the success and convergence rates of sampling-based motion planning algorithms. Yet, few results are available that merge both bi-directional search and asymptotic optimality into existing optimal planners, such as PRM*, RRT*, and FMT*. The objective of this paper is to fill this gap. Specifically, this paper presents a bi-directional, sampling-based, asymptotically-optimal algorithm named Bi-directional FMT* (BFMT*) that extends the Fast Marching Tree (FMT*) algorithm to bi-directional search while preserving its key properties, chiefly lazy search and asymptotic optimality through convergence in probability. BFMT* performs a two-source, lazy dynamic programming recursion over a set of randomly-drawn samples, correspondingly generating two search trees: one in cost-to-come space from the initial configuration and another in cost-to-go space from the goal configuration. Numerical experiments illustrate the advantages of BFMT* over its unidirectional counterpart, as well as a number of other state-of-the-art planners.Comment: Accepted to the 2015 IEEE Intelligent Robotics and Systems Conference in Hamburg, Germany. This submission represents the long version of the conference manuscript, with additional proof details (Section IV) regarding the asymptotic optimality of the BFMT* algorith

    Asymptotically near-optimal RRT for fast, high-quality, motion planning

    Full text link
    We present Lower Bound Tree-RRT (LBT-RRT), a single-query sampling-based algorithm that is asymptotically near-optimal. Namely, the solution extracted from LBT-RRT converges to a solution that is within an approximation factor of 1+epsilon of the optimal solution. Our algorithm allows for a continuous interpolation between the fast RRT algorithm and the asymptotically optimal RRT* and RRG algorithms. When the approximation factor is 1 (i.e., no approximation is allowed), LBT-RRT behaves like RRG. When the approximation factor is unbounded, LBT-RRT behaves like RRT. In between, LBT-RRT is shown to produce paths that have higher quality than RRT would produce and run faster than RRT* would run. This is done by maintaining a tree which is a sub-graph of the RRG roadmap and a second, auxiliary graph, which we call the lower-bound graph. The combination of the two roadmaps, which is faster to maintain than the roadmap maintained by RRT*, efficiently guarantees asymptotic near-optimality. We suggest to use LBT-RRT for high-quality, anytime motion planning. We demonstrate the performance of the algorithm for scenarios ranging from 3 to 12 degrees of freedom and show that even for small approximation factors, the algorithm produces high-quality solutions (comparable to RRG and RRT*) with little running-time overhead when compared to RRT

    Enhancing 3D Autonomous Navigation Through Obstacle Fields: Homogeneous Localisation and Mapping, with Obstacle-Aware Trajectory Optimisation

    Get PDF
    Small flying robots have numerous potential applications, from quadrotors for search and rescue, infrastructure inspection and package delivery to free-flying satellites for assistance activities inside a space station. To enable these applications, a key challenge is autonomous navigation in 3D, near obstacles on a power, mass and computation constrained platform. This challenge requires a robot to perform localisation, mapping, dynamics-aware trajectory planning and control. The current state-of-the-art uses separate algorithms for each component. Here, the aim is for a more homogeneous approach in the search for improved efficiencies and capabilities. First, an algorithm is described to perform Simultaneous Localisation And Mapping (SLAM) with physical, 3D map representation that can also be used to represent obstacles for trajectory planning: Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) surfaces. Termed NURBSLAM, this algorithm is shown to combine the typically separate tasks of localisation and obstacle mapping. Second, a trajectory optimisation algorithm is presented that produces dynamically-optimal trajectories with direct consideration of obstacles, providing a middle ground between path planners and trajectory smoothers. Called the Admissible Subspace TRajectory Optimiser (ASTRO), the algorithm can produce trajectories that are easier to track than the state-of-the-art for flight near obstacles, as shown in flight tests with quadrotors. For quadrotors to track trajectories, a critical component is the differential flatness transformation that links position and attitude controllers. Existing singularities in this transformation are analysed, solutions are proposed and are then demonstrated in flight tests. Finally, a combined system of NURBSLAM and ASTRO are brought together and tested against the state-of-the-art in a novel simulation environment to prove the concept that a single 3D representation can be used for localisation, mapping, and planning

    Fast Marching Methods in path and motion planning: improvements and high-level applications

    Get PDF
    Mención Internacional en el título de doctorPath planning is defined as the process to establish the sequence of states a system must go through in order to reach a desired state. Additionally, motion planning (or trajectory planning) aims to compute the sequence of motions (or actions) to take the system from one state to another. In robotics path planning can refer for instance to the waypoints a robot should follow through a maze or the sequence of points a robotic arm has to follow in order to grasp an object. Motion planning is considered a more general problem, since it includes kinodynamic constraints. As motion planning is a more complex problem, it is often solved in a two-level approach: path planning in the first level and then a control layer tries to drive the system along the specified path. However, it is hard to guarantee that the final trajectory will keep the initial characteristics. The objective of this work is to solve different path and motion planning problems under a common framework in order to facilitate the integration of the different algorithms that can be required during the nominal operation of a mobile robot. Also, other related areas such as motion learning are explored using this framework. In order to achieve this, a simple but powerful algorithm called Fast Marching will be used. Originally, it was proposed to solve optimal control problems. However, it has became very useful to other related problems such as path and motion planning. Since Fast Marching was initially proposed, many different alternative approaches have been proposed. Therefore, the first step is to formulate all these methods within a common framework and carry out an exhaustive comparison in order to give a final answer to: which algorithm is the best under which situations? This Thesis shows that the different versions of Fast Marching Methods become useful when applied to motion and path planning problems. Usually, high-level problems as motion learning or robot formation planning are solved with completely different algorithms, as the problem formulation are mixed. Under a common framework, task integration becomes much easier bringing robots closer to everyday applications. The Fast Marching Method has also inspired modern probabilistic methodologies, where computational cost is enormously improved at the cost of bounded, stochastic variations on the resulting paths and trajectories. This Thesis also explores these novel algorithms and their performance.Programa Oficial de Doctorado en Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica y AutomáticaPresidente: Carlos Balaguer Bernaldo de Quirós.- Secretario: Antonio Giménez Fernández.- Vocal: Isabel Lobato de Faria Ribeir
    corecore