A Large-Scale Community Questions Classification Accounting for Category Similarity: An Exploratory?

The paper reports on a large-scale topical categorization of questions from a Russian community question answering (CQA) service [email protected]. We used a data set containing all the questions (more than 11 millions) asked by [email protected] users in 2012. This is the first study on question categorization dealing with non-English data of this size. The study focuses on adjusting category structure in order to get more robust classification results. We investigate several approaches to measure similarity between categories: the share of identical questions, language models, and user activity. The results show that the proposed approach is promising.14-07-00589; RFBR; Russian Foundation for Basic Research

Adapting Visual Question Answering Models for Enhancing Multimodal Community Q&A Platforms

Question categorization and expert retrieval methods have been crucial for information organization and accessibility in community question & answering (CQA) platforms. Research in this area, however, has dealt with only the text modality. With the increasing multimodal nature of web content, we focus on extending these methods for CQA questions accompanied by images. Specifically, we leverage the success of representation learning for text and images in the visual question answering (VQA) domain, and adapt the underlying concept and architecture for automated category classification and expert retrieval on image-based questions posted on Yahoo! Chiebukuro, the Japanese counterpart of Yahoo! Answers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to tackle the multimodality challenge in CQA, and to adapt VQA models for tasks on a more ecologically valid source of visual questions. Our analysis of the differences between visual QA and community QA data drives our proposal of novel augmentations of an attention method tailored for CQA, and use of auxiliary tasks for learning better grounding features. Our final model markedly outperforms the text-only and VQA model baselines for both tasks of classification and expert retrieval on real-world multimodal CQA data.Comment: Submitted for review at CIKM 201

Understanding and exploiting user intent in community question answering

A number of Community Question Answering (CQA) services have emerged and proliferated in the last decade. Typical examples include Yahoo! Answers, WikiAnswers, and also domain-specific forums like StackOverflow. These services help users obtain information from a community - a user can post his or her questions which may then be answered by other users. Such a paradigm of information seeking is particularly appealing when the question cannot be answered directly by Web search engines due to the unavailability of relevant online content. However, question submitted to a CQA service are often colloquial and ambiguous. An accurate understanding of the intent behind a question is important for satisfying the user's information need more effectively and efficiently. In this thesis, we analyse the intent of each question in CQA by classifying it into five dimensions, namely: subjectivity, locality, navigationality, procedurality, and causality. By making use of advanced machine learning techniques, such as Co-Training and PU-Learning, we are able to attain consistent and significant classification improvements over the state-of-the-art in this area. In addition to the textual features, a variety of metadata features (such as the category where the question was posted to) are used to model a user's intent, which in turn help the CQA service to perform better in finding similar questions, identifying relevant answers, and recommending the most relevant answerers. We validate the usefulness of user intent in two different CQA tasks. Our first application is question retrieval, where we present a hybrid approach which blends several language modelling techniques, namely, the classic (query-likelihood) language model, the state-of-the-art translation-based language model, and our proposed intent-based language model. Our second application is answer validation, where we present a two-stage model which first ranks similar questions by using our proposed hybrid approach, and then validates whether the answer of the top candidate can be served as an answer to a new question by leveraging sentiment analysis, query quality assessment, and search lists validation

The Best Answers? Think Twice: Online Detection of Commercial Campaigns in the CQA Forums

In an emerging trend, more and more Internet users search for information from Community Question and Answer (CQA) websites, as interactive communication in such websites provides users with a rare feeling of trust. More often than not, end users look for instant help when they browse the CQA websites for the best answers. Hence, it is imperative that they should be warned of any potential commercial campaigns hidden behind the answers. However, existing research focuses more on the quality of answers and does not meet the above need. In this paper, we develop a system that automatically analyzes the hidden patterns of commercial spam and raises alarms instantaneously to end users whenever a potential commercial campaign is detected. Our detection method integrates semantic analysis and posters' track records and utilizes the special features of CQA websites largely different from those in other types of forums such as microblogs or news reports. Our system is adaptive and accommodates new evidence uncovered by the detection algorithms over time. Validated with real-world trace data from a popular Chinese CQA website over a period of three months, our system shows great potential towards adaptive online detection of CQA spams.Comment: 9 pages, 10 figure

The Social World of Content Abusers in Community Question Answering

Community-based question answering platforms can be rich sources of information on a variety of specialized topics, from finance to cooking. The usefulness of such platforms depends heavily on user contributions (questions and answers), but also on respecting the community rules. As a crowd-sourced service, such platforms rely on their users for monitoring and flagging content that violates community rules. Common wisdom is to eliminate the users who receive many flags. Our analysis of a year of traces from a mature Q&A site shows that the number of flags does not tell the full story: on one hand, users with many flags may still contribute positively to the community. On the other hand, users who never get flagged are found to violate community rules and get their accounts suspended. This analysis, however, also shows that abusive users are betrayed by their network properties: we find strong evidence of homophilous behavior and use this finding to detect abusive users who go under the community radar. Based on our empirical observations, we build a classifier that is able to detect abusive users with an accuracy as high as 83%.Comment: Published in the proceedings of the 24th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2015

Question Classification in the Cancer Domain

We are investigating question classification for restricted domains with the broader goal of supporting mixed-initiative interaction on mobile phones. In this thesis, we present the development of a new domain-specific corpus of cancer-related questions, a new taxonomy of Expected Answer types, and our efforts toward training a classifier. This work is the first of its kind in the cancer domain using a corpus consisting of real user questions gathered from cQA websites, and a taxonomy built from that corpus. Our goal is to create software to engage newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients in question-answering dialogs related to their treatment options. We are focusing our work on the interaction environment afforded by text and multimedia (SMS and MMS) messaging using mobile telephones, because of the prevalence of this technology and the growing popularity of text messaging, especially among underserved populations

Understanding and exploiting user intent in community question answering

A number of Community Question Answering (CQA) services have emerged and proliferated in the last decade. Typical examples include Yahoo! Answers, WikiAnswers, and also domain-specific forums like StackOverflow. These services help users obtain information from a community - a user can post his or her questions which may then be answered by other users. Such a paradigm of information seeking is particularly appealing when the question cannot be answered directly by Web search engines due to the unavailability of relevant online content. However, question submitted to a CQA service are often colloquial and ambiguous. An accurate understanding of the intent behind a question is important for satisfying the user's information need more effectively and efficiently. In this thesis, we analyse the intent of each question in CQA by classifying it into five dimensions, namely: subjectivity, locality, navigationality, procedurality, and causality. By making use of advanced machine learning techniques, such as Co-Training and PU-Learning, we are able to attain consistent and significant classification improvements over the state-of-the-art in this area. In addition to the textual features, a variety of metadata features (such as the category where the question was posted to) are used to model a user's intent, which in turn help the CQA service to perform better in finding similar questions, identifying relevant answers, and recommending the most relevant answerers. We validate the usefulness of user intent in two different CQA tasks. Our first application is question retrieval, where we present a hybrid approach which blends several language modelling techniques, namely, the classic (query-likelihood) language model, the state-of-the-art translation-based language model, and our proposed intent-based language model. Our second application is answer validation, where we present a two-stage model which first ranks similar questions by using our proposed hybrid approach, and then validates whether the answer of the top candidate can be served as an answer to a new question by leveraging sentiment analysis, query quality assessment, and search lists validation