A BDI agent programming language with failure handling, declarative goals, and planning

Agents are an important technology that have the potential to take over contemporary methods for analysing, designing, and implementing complex software. The Belief- Desire-Intention (BDI) agent paradigm has proven to be one of the major approaches to intelligent agent systems, both in academia and in industry. Typical BDI agent-oriented programming languages rely on user-provided ''plan libraries'' to achieve goals, and online context sensitive subgoal selection and expansion. These allow for the development of systems that are extremely flexible and responsive to the environment, and as a result, well suited for complex applications with (soft) real-time reasoning and control requirements. Nonetheless, complex decision making that goes beyond, but is compatible with, run-time context-dependent plan selection is one of the most natural and important next steps within this technology. In this paper we develop a typical BDI-style agent-oriented programming language that enhances usual BDI programming style with three distinguished features: declarative goals, look-ahead planning, and failure handling. First, an account that mixes both procedural and declarative aspects of goals is necessary in order to reason about important properties of goals and to decouple plans from what these plans are meant to achieve. Second, lookahead deliberation about the effects of one choice of expansion over another is clearly desirable or even mandatory in many circumstances so as to guarantee goal achievability and to avoid undesired situations. Finally, a failure handling mechanism, suitably integrated with both declarative goals and planning, is required in order to model an adequate level of commitment to goals, as well as to be consistent with most real BDI implemented systems

handling, declarative goals, and planning

A BDI agent programming language with failur

GROVE: A computationally grounded model for rational intention revision in BDI agents

A fundamental aspect of Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) agents is intention revision. Agents revise their intentions in order to maintain consistency between their intentions and beliefs, and consistency between intentions. A rational agent must also account for the optimality of their intentions in the case of revision. To that end I present GROVE, a model of rational intention revision for BDI agents. The semantics of a GROVE agent is defined in terms of constraints and preferences on possible future executions of an agent’s plans. I show that GROVE is weakly rational in the sense of Grant et al. and imposes more constraints on executions than the operational semantics for goal lifecycles proposed by Harland et al. As it may not be computationally feasible to consider all possible future executions, I propose a bounded version of GROVE that samples the set of future executions, and state conditions under which bounded GROVE commits to a rational execution

GROVE: A computationally grounded model for rational intention revision in BDI agents

A fundamental aspect of Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) agents is intention revision. Agents revise their intentions in order to maintain consistency between their intentions and beliefs, and consistency between intentions. A rational agent must also account for the optimality of their intentions in the case of revision. To that end I present GROVE, a model of rational intention revision for BDI agents. The semantics of a GROVE agent is defined in terms of constraints and preferences on possible future executions of an agent’s plans. I show that GROVE is weakly rational in the sense of Grant et al. and imposes more constraints on executions than the operational semantics for goal lifecycles proposed by Harland et al. As it may not be computationally feasible to consider all possible future executions, I propose a bounded version of GROVE that samples the set of future executions, and state conditions under which bounded GROVE commits to a rational execution

Planning in BDI agent systems

 Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) agent systems are a popular approach to developing agents for complex and dynamic environments. These agents rely on context sensitive expansion of plans, acting as they go, and consequently, they do not incorporate a generic mechanism to do any kind of “look-ahead” or offline planning. This is useful when, for instance, important resources may be consumed by executing steps that are not necessary for a goal; steps are not reversible and may lead to situations in which a goal cannot be solved; and side effects of steps are undesirable if they are not useful for a goal. In this thesis, we incorporate planning techniques into BDI systems. First, we provide a general mechanism for performing “look-ahead” planning, using Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning techniques, so that an agent may guide its selection of plans for the purpose of avoiding negative interactions between them. Unlike past work on adding such planning into BDI agents, which do so only at the implementation level without any precise semantics, we provide a solid theoretical basis for such planning. Second, we incorporate first principles planning into BDI systems, so that new plans may be created for achieving goals. Unlike past work, which focuses on creating low-level plans, losing much of the domain knowledge encoded in BDI agents, we introduce a novel technique where plans are created by respecting and reusing the procedural domain knowledge encoded in such agents; our abstract plans can be executed in the standard BDI engine using this knowledge. Furthermore, we recognise an intrinsic tension between striving for abstract plans and, at the same time, ensuring that unnecessary actions, unrelated to the specific goal to be achieved, are avoided. To explore this tension, we characterise the set of “ideal” abstract plans that are non-redundant while maximally abstract, and then develop a more limited but feasible account where an abstract plan is “specialised” into a plan that is non-redundant and as abstract as possible. We present theoretical properties of the planning frameworks, as well as insights into their practical utility