1,683 research outputs found
Sublinear Distance Labeling
A distance labeling scheme labels the nodes of a graph with binary
strings such that, given the labels of any two nodes, one can determine the
distance in the graph between the two nodes by looking only at the labels. A
-preserving distance labeling scheme only returns precise distances between
pairs of nodes that are at distance at least from each other. In this paper
we consider distance labeling schemes for the classical case of unweighted
graphs with both directed and undirected edges.
We present a bit -preserving distance labeling
scheme, improving the previous bound by Bollob\'as et. al. [SIAM J. Discrete
Math. 2005]. We also give an almost matching lower bound of
. With our -preserving distance labeling scheme as a
building block, we additionally achieve the following results:
1. We present the first distance labeling scheme of size for sparse
graphs (and hence bounded degree graphs). This addresses an open problem by
Gavoille et. al. [J. Algo. 2004], hereby separating the complexity from
distance labeling in general graphs which require bits, Moon [Proc.
of Glasgow Math. Association 1965].
2. For approximate -additive labeling schemes, that return distances
within an additive error of we show a scheme of size for .
This improves on the current best bound of by
Alstrup et. al. [SODA 2016] for sub-polynomial , and is a generalization of
a result by Gawrychowski et al. [arXiv preprint 2015] who showed this for
.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appeared at ESA'1
Noise Sensitivity of Boolean Functions and Applications to Percolation
It is shown that a large class of events in a product probability space are
highly sensitive to noise, in the sense that with high probability, the
configuration with an arbitrary small percent of random errors gives almost no
prediction whether the event occurs. On the other hand, weighted majority
functions are shown to be noise-stable. Several necessary and sufficient
conditions for noise sensitivity and stability are given.
Consider, for example, bond percolation on an by grid. A
configuration is a function that assigns to every edge the value 0 or 1. Let
be a random configuration, selected according to the uniform measure.
A crossing is a path that joins the left and right sides of the rectangle, and
consists entirely of edges with . By duality, the probability
for having a crossing is 1/2. Fix an . For each edge , let
with probability , and
with probability , independently of the
other edges. Let be the probability for having a crossing in
, conditioned on . Then for all sufficiently large,
.Comment: To appear in Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Mat
Drawing Arrangement Graphs In Small Grids, Or How To Play Planarity
We describe a linear-time algorithm that finds a planar drawing of every
graph of a simple line or pseudoline arrangement within a grid of area
O(n^{7/6}). No known input causes our algorithm to use area
\Omega(n^{1+\epsilon}) for any \epsilon>0; finding such an input would
represent significant progress on the famous k-set problem from discrete
geometry. Drawing line arrangement graphs is the main task in the Planarity
puzzle.Comment: 12 pages, 8 figures. To appear at 21st Int. Symp. Graph Drawing,
Bordeaux, 201
Energy Complexity of Distance Computation in Multi-hop Networks
Energy efficiency is a critical issue for wireless devices operated under
stringent power constraint (e.g., battery). Following prior works, we measure
the energy cost of a device by its transceiver usage, and define the energy
complexity of an algorithm as the maximum number of time slots a device
transmits or listens, over all devices. In a recent paper of Chang et al. (PODC
2018), it was shown that broadcasting in a multi-hop network of unknown
topology can be done in energy. In this paper, we continue
this line of research, and investigate the energy complexity of other
fundamental graph problems in multi-hop networks. Our results are summarized as
follows.
1. To avoid spending energy, the broadcasting protocols of Chang
et al. (PODC 2018) do not send the message along a BFS tree, and it is open
whether BFS could be computed in energy, for sufficiently large . In
this paper we devise an algorithm that attains energy
cost.
2. We show that the framework of the round lower bound proof
for computing diameter in CONGEST of Abboud et al. (DISC 2017) can be adapted
to give an energy lower bound in the wireless network model
(with no message size constraint), and this lower bound applies to -arboricity graphs. From the upper bound side, we show that the energy
complexity of can be attained for bounded-genus graphs
(which includes planar graphs).
3. Our upper bounds for computing diameter can be extended to other graph
problems. We show that exact global minimum cut or approximate -- minimum
cut can be computed in energy for bounded-genus graphs
Near-Optimal Induced Universal Graphs for Bounded Degree Graphs
A graph U is an induced universal graph for a family F of graphs if every graph in F is a vertex-induced subgraph of U.
We give upper and lower bounds for the size of induced universal graphs for the family of graphs with n vertices of maximum degree D. Our new bounds improve several previous results except for the special cases where D is either near-constant or almost n/2. For constant even D Butler [Graphs and Combinatorics 2009] has shown O(n^(D/2)) and recently Alon and Nenadov [SODA 2017] showed the same bound for constant odd D. For constant D Butler also gave a matching lower bound. For generals graphs, which corresponds to D = n, Alon [Geometric and Functional Analysis, to appear] proved the existence of an induced universal graph with (1+o(1)) cdot 2^((n-1)/2) vertices, leading to a smaller constant than in the previously best known bound of 16 * 2^(n/2) by Alstrup, Kaplan, Thorup, and Zwick [STOC 2015].
In this paper we give the following lower and upper bound of
binom(floor(n/2))(floor(D/2)) * n^(-O(1))
and
binom(floor(n/2))(floor(D/2)) * 2^(O(sqrt(D log D) * log(n/D))),
respectively, where the upper bound is the main contribution. The proof that it is an induced universal graph relies on a randomized argument. We also give a deterministic upper bound of O(n^k / (k-1)!). These upper bounds are the best known when D <= n/2 - tilde-Omega(n^(3/4)) and either D is even and D = omega(1) or D is odd and D = omega(log n/log log n). In this range we improve asymptotically on the previous best known results by Butler [Graphs and Combinatorics 2009], Esperet, Arnaud and Ochem [IPL 2008], Adjiashvili and Rotbart [ICALP 2014], Alon and Nenadov [SODA 2017], and Alon [Geometric and Functional Analysis, to appear]
- …