39,622 research outputs found

    A Simple Iterative Algorithm for Parsimonious Binary Kernel Fisher Discrimination

    Get PDF
    By applying recent results in optimization theory variously known as optimization transfer or majorize/minimize algorithms, an algorithm for binary, kernel, Fisher discriminant analysis is introduced that makes use of a non-smooth penalty on the coefficients to provide a parsimonious solution. The problem is converted into a smooth optimization that can be solved iteratively with no greater overhead than iteratively re-weighted least-squares. The result is simple, easily programmed and is shown to perform, in terms of both accuracy and parsimony, as well as or better than a number of leading machine learning algorithms on two well-studied and substantial benchmarks

    A Survey on Compiler Autotuning using Machine Learning

    Full text link
    Since the mid-1990s, researchers have been trying to use machine-learning based approaches to solve a number of different compiler optimization problems. These techniques primarily enhance the quality of the obtained results and, more importantly, make it feasible to tackle two main compiler optimization problems: optimization selection (choosing which optimizations to apply) and phase-ordering (choosing the order of applying optimizations). The compiler optimization space continues to grow due to the advancement of applications, increasing number of compiler optimizations, and new target architectures. Generic optimization passes in compilers cannot fully leverage newly introduced optimizations and, therefore, cannot keep up with the pace of increasing options. This survey summarizes and classifies the recent advances in using machine learning for the compiler optimization field, particularly on the two major problems of (1) selecting the best optimizations and (2) the phase-ordering of optimizations. The survey highlights the approaches taken so far, the obtained results, the fine-grain classification among different approaches and finally, the influential papers of the field.Comment: version 5.0 (updated on September 2018)- Preprint Version For our Accepted Journal @ ACM CSUR 2018 (42 pages) - This survey will be updated quarterly here (Send me your new published papers to be added in the subsequent version) History: Received November 2016; Revised August 2017; Revised February 2018; Accepted March 2018

    Application of Fractal Dimension for Quantifying Noise Texture in Computed Tomography Images

    Get PDF
    Purpose Evaluation of noise texture information in CT images is important for assessing image quality. Noise texture is often quantified by the noise power spectrum (NPS), which requires numerous image realizations to estimate. This study evaluated fractal dimension for quantifying noise texture as a scalar metric that can potentially be estimated using one image realization. Methods The American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom (ACR) was scanned on a clinical scanner (Discovery CT750, GE Healthcare) at 120 kV and 25 and 90 mAs. Images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP/ASIR 0%) with varying reconstruction kernels: Soft, Standard, Detail, Chest, Lung, Bone, and Edge. For each kernel, images were also reconstructed using ASIR 50% and ASIR 100% iterative reconstruction (IR) methods. Fractal dimension was estimated using the differential box‐counting algorithm applied to images of the uniform section of ACR phantom. The two‐dimensional Noise Power Spectrum (NPS) and one‐dimensional‐radially averaged NPS were estimated using established techniques. By changing the radiation dose, the effect of noise magnitude on fractal dimension was evaluated. The Spearman correlation between the fractal dimension and the frequency of the NPS peak was calculated. The number of images required to reliably estimate fractal dimension was determined and compared to the number of images required to estimate the NPS‐peak frequency. The effect of Region of Interest (ROI) size on fractal dimension estimation was evaluated. Feasibility of estimating fractal dimension in an anthropomorphic phantom and clinical image was also investigated, with the resulting fractal dimension compared to that estimated within the uniform section of the ACR phantom. Results Fractal dimension was strongly correlated with the frequency of the peak of the radially averaged NPS curve, having a Spearman rank‐order coefficient of 0.98 (P‐value \u3c 0.01) for ASIR 0%. The mean fractal dimension at ASIR 0% was 2.49 (Soft), 2.51 (Standard), 2.52 (Detail), 2.57 (Chest), 2.61 (Lung), 2.66 (Bone), and 2.7 (Edge). A reduction in fractal dimension was observed with increasing ASIR levels for all investigated reconstruction kernels. Fractal dimension was found to be independent of noise magnitude. Fractal dimension was successfully estimated from four ROIs of size 64 × 64 pixels or one ROI of 128 × 128 pixels. Fractal dimension was found to be sensitive to non‐noise structures in the image, such as ring artifacts and anatomical structure. Fractal dimension estimated within a uniform region of an anthropomorphic phantom and clinical head image matched that estimated within the ACR phantom for filtered back projection reconstruction. Conclusions Fractal dimension correlated with the NPS‐peak frequency and was independent of noise magnitude, suggesting that the scalar metric of fractal dimension can be used to quantify the change in noise texture across reconstruction approaches. Results demonstrated that fractal dimension can be estimated from four, 64 × 64‐pixel ROIs or one 128 × 128 ROI within a head CT image, which may make it amenable for quantifying noise texture within clinical images
    • 

    corecore