17,356 research outputs found
Immunity and Simplicity for Exact Counting and Other Counting Classes
Ko [RAIRO 24, 1990] and Bruschi [TCS 102, 1992] showed that in some
relativized world, PSPACE (in fact, ParityP) contains a set that is immune to
the polynomial hierarchy (PH). In this paper, we study and settle the question
of (relativized) separations with immunity for PH and the counting classes PP,
C_{=}P, and ParityP in all possible pairwise combinations. Our main result is
that there is an oracle A relative to which C_{=}P contains a set that is
immune to BPP^{ParityP}. In particular, this C_{=}P^A set is immune to PH^{A}
and ParityP^{A}. Strengthening results of Tor\'{a}n [J.ACM 38, 1991] and Green
[IPL 37, 1991], we also show that, in suitable relativizations, NP contains a
C_{=}P-immune set, and ParityP contains a PP^{PH}-immune set. This implies the
existence of a C_{=}P^{B}-simple set for some oracle B, which extends results
of Balc\'{a}zar et al. [SIAM J.Comp. 14, 1985; RAIRO 22, 1988] and provides the
first example of a simple set in a class not known to be contained in PH. Our
proof technique requires a circuit lower bound for ``exact counting'' that is
derived from Razborov's [Mat. Zametki 41, 1987] lower bound for majority.Comment: 20 page
Super-Linear Gate and Super-Quadratic Wire Lower Bounds for Depth-Two and Depth-Three Threshold Circuits
In order to formally understand the power of neural computing, we first need
to crack the frontier of threshold circuits with two and three layers, a regime
that has been surprisingly intractable to analyze. We prove the first
super-linear gate lower bounds and the first super-quadratic wire lower bounds
for depth-two linear threshold circuits with arbitrary weights, and depth-three
majority circuits computing an explicit function.
We prove that for all , the
linear-time computable Andreev's function cannot be computed on a
-fraction of -bit inputs by depth-two linear threshold
circuits of gates, nor can it be computed with
wires. This establishes an average-case
``size hierarchy'' for threshold circuits, as Andreev's function is computable
by uniform depth-two circuits of linear threshold gates, and by
uniform depth-three circuits of majority gates.
We present a new function in based on small-biased sets, which
we prove cannot be computed by a majority vote of depth-two linear threshold
circuits with gates, nor with
wires.
We give tight average-case (gate and wire) complexity results for
computing PARITY with depth-two threshold circuits; the answer turns out to be
the same as for depth-two majority circuits.
The key is a new random restriction lemma for linear threshold functions. Our
main analytical tool is the Littlewood-Offord Lemma from additive
combinatorics
Efficient Algorithms for Membership in Boolean Hierarchies of Regular Languages
The purpose of this paper is to provide efficient algorithms that decide
membership for classes of several Boolean hierarchies for which efficiency (or
even decidability) were previously not known. We develop new forbidden-chain
characterizations for the single levels of these hierarchies and obtain the
following results: - The classes of the Boolean hierarchy over level
of the dot-depth hierarchy are decidable in (previously only the
decidability was known). The same remains true if predicates mod for fixed
are allowed. - If modular predicates for arbitrary are allowed, then
the classes of the Boolean hierarchy over level are decidable. - For
the restricted case of a two-letter alphabet, the classes of the Boolean
hierarchy over level of the Straubing-Th\'erien hierarchy are
decidable in . This is the first decidability result for this hierarchy. -
The membership problems for all mentioned Boolean-hierarchy classes are
logspace many-one hard for . - The membership problems for quasi-aperiodic
languages and for -quasi-aperiodic languages are logspace many-one complete
for
Three Puzzles on Mathematics, Computation, and Games
In this lecture I will talk about three mathematical puzzles involving
mathematics and computation that have preoccupied me over the years. The first
puzzle is to understand the amazing success of the simplex algorithm for linear
programming. The second puzzle is about errors made when votes are counted
during elections. The third puzzle is: are quantum computers possible?Comment: ICM 2018 plenary lecture, Rio de Janeiro, 36 pages, 7 Figure
A Near-Optimal Depth-Hierarchy Theorem for Small-Depth Multilinear Circuits
We study the size blow-up that is necessary to convert an algebraic circuit
of product-depth to one of product-depth in the multilinear
setting.
We show that for every positive
there is an explicit multilinear polynomial on variables
that can be computed by a multilinear formula of product-depth and
size , but not by any multilinear circuit of product-depth and
size less than . This result is tight up to the
constant implicit in the double exponent for all
This strengthens a result of Raz and Yehudayoff (Computational Complexity
2009) who prove a quasipolynomial separation for constant-depth multilinear
circuits, and a result of Kayal, Nair and Saha (STACS 2016) who give an
exponential separation in the case
Our separating examples may be viewed as algebraic analogues of variants of
the Graph Reachability problem studied by Chen, Oliveira, Servedio and Tan
(STOC 2016), who used them to prove lower bounds for constant-depth Boolean
circuits
An average-case depth hierarchy theorem for Boolean circuits
We prove an average-case depth hierarchy theorem for Boolean circuits over
the standard basis of , , and gates.
Our hierarchy theorem says that for every , there is an explicit
-variable Boolean function , computed by a linear-size depth- formula,
which is such that any depth- circuit that agrees with on fraction of all inputs must have size This
answers an open question posed by H{\aa}stad in his Ph.D. thesis.
Our average-case depth hierarchy theorem implies that the polynomial
hierarchy is infinite relative to a random oracle with probability 1,
confirming a conjecture of H{\aa}stad, Cai, and Babai. We also use our result
to show that there is no "approximate converse" to the results of Linial,
Mansour, Nisan and Boppana on the total influence of small-depth circuits, thus
answering a question posed by O'Donnell, Kalai, and Hatami.
A key ingredient in our proof is a notion of \emph{random projections} which
generalize random restrictions
A note on quantum algorithms and the minimal degree of epsilon-error polynomials for symmetric functions
The degrees of polynomials representing or approximating Boolean functions
are a prominent tool in various branches of complexity theory. Sherstov
recently characterized the minimal degree deg_{\eps}(f) among all polynomials
(over the reals) that approximate a symmetric function f:{0,1}^n-->{0,1} up to
worst-case error \eps: deg_{\eps}(f) = ~\Theta(deg_{1/3}(f) +
\sqrt{n\log(1/\eps)}). In this note we show how a tighter version (without the
log-factors hidden in the ~\Theta-notation), can be derived quite easily using
the close connection between polynomials and quantum algorithms.Comment: 7 pages LaTeX. 2nd version: corrected a few small inaccuracie
- …