Route Planning in Transportation Networks

We survey recent advances in algorithms for route planning in transportation networks. For road networks, we show that one can compute driving directions in milliseconds or less even at continental scale. A variety of techniques provide different trade-offs between preprocessing effort, space requirements, and query time. Some algorithms can answer queries in a fraction of a microsecond, while others can deal efficiently with real-time traffic. Journey planning on public transportation systems, although conceptually similar, is a significantly harder problem due to its inherent time-dependent and multicriteria nature. Although exact algorithms are fast enough for interactive queries on metropolitan transit systems, dealing with continent-sized instances requires simplifications or heavy preprocessing. The multimodal route planning problem, which seeks journeys combining schedule-based transportation (buses, trains) with unrestricted modes (walking, driving), is even harder, relying on approximate solutions even for metropolitan inputs.Comment: This is an updated version of the technical report MSR-TR-2014-4, previously published by Microsoft Research. This work was mostly done while the authors Daniel Delling, Andrew Goldberg, and Renato F. Werneck were at Microsoft Research Silicon Valle

Algorithms for Landmark Hub Labeling

Landmark-based routing and Hub Labeling (HL) are shortest path planning techniques, both of which rely on storing shortest path distances between selected pairs of nodes in a preprocessing phase to accelerate query answering. In Landmark-based routing, stored distances to landmark nodes are used to obtain distance lower bounds that guide A* search from node s to node t. With HL, tight upper bounds for shortest path distances between any s-t-pair can be interfered from their stored node labels, making HL an efficient distance oracle. However, for shortest path retrieval, the oracle has to be called once per edge in said path. Furthermore, HL often suffers from a large space consumption as many node pair distances have to be stored in the labels to allow for correct query answering. In this paper, we propose a novel technique, called Landmark Hub Labeling (LHL), which integrates the landmark concept into HL. We prove better worst-case path retrieval times for LHL in case it is path-consistent (a new labeling property we introduce). Moreover, we design efficient (approximation) algorithms that produce path-consistent LHL with small label size and provide parametrized upper bounds, depending on the highway dimension h or the geodesic transversal number gt of the graph. Finally, we show that the space consumption of LHL is smaller than that of (hierarchical) HL, both in theory and in experiments on real-world road networks

Developments in the theory of randomized shortest paths with a comparison of graph node distances

There have lately been several suggestions for parametrized distances on a graph that generalize the shortest path distance and the commute time or resistance distance. The need for developing such distances has risen from the observation that the above-mentioned common distances in many situations fail to take into account the global structure of the graph. In this article, we develop the theory of one family of graph node distances, known as the randomized shortest path dissimilarity, which has its foundation in statistical physics. We show that the randomized shortest path dissimilarity can be easily computed in closed form for all pairs of nodes of a graph. Moreover, we come up with a new definition of a distance measure that we call the free energy distance. The free energy distance can be seen as an upgrade of the randomized shortest path dissimilarity as it defines a metric, in addition to which it satisfies the graph-geodetic property. The derivation and computation of the free energy distance are also straightforward. We then make a comparison between a set of generalized distances that interpolate between the shortest path distance and the commute time, or resistance distance. This comparison focuses on the applicability of the distances in graph node clustering and classification. The comparison, in general, shows that the parametrized distances perform well in the tasks. In particular, we see that the results obtained with the free energy distance are among the best in all the experiments.Comment: 30 pages, 4 figures, 3 table

TopCom: Index for Shortest Distance Query in Directed Graph

Finding shortest distance between two vertices in a graph is an important problem due to its numerous applications in diverse domains, including geo-spatial databases, social network analysis, and information retrieval. Classical algorithms (such as, Dijkstra) solve this problem in polynomial time, but these algorithms cannot provide real-time response for a large number of bursty queries on a large graph. So, indexing based solutions that pre-process the graph for efficiently answering (exactly or approximately) a large number of distance queries in real-time is becoming increasingly popular. Existing solutions have varying performance in terms of index size, index building time, query time, and accuracy. In this work, we propose T OP C OM , a novel indexing-based solution for exactly answering distance queries. Our experiments with two of the existing state-of-the-art methods (IS-Label and TreeMap) show the superiority of T OP C OM over these two methods considering scalability and query time. Besides, indexing of T OP C OM exploits the DAG (directed acyclic graph) structure in the graph, which makes it significantly faster than the existing methods if the SCCs (strongly connected component) of the input graph are relatively small