47 research outputs found
From nominal sets binding to functions and lambda-abstraction: connecting the logic of permutation models with the logic of functions
Permissive-Nominal Logic (PNL) extends first-order predicate logic with
term-formers that can bind names in their arguments. It takes a semantics in
(permissive-)nominal sets. In PNL, the forall-quantifier or lambda-binder are
just term-formers satisfying axioms, and their denotation is functions on
nominal atoms-abstraction.
Then we have higher-order logic (HOL) and its models in ordinary (i.e.
Zermelo-Fraenkel) sets; the denotation of forall or lambda is functions on full
or partial function spaces.
This raises the following question: how are these two models of binding
connected? What translation is possible between PNL and HOL, and between
nominal sets and functions?
We exhibit a translation of PNL into HOL, and from models of PNL to certain
models of HOL. It is natural, but also partial: we translate a restricted
subsystem of full PNL to HOL. The extra part which does not translate is the
symmetry properties of nominal sets with respect to permutations. To use a
little nominal jargon: we can translate names and binding, but not their
nominal equivariance properties. This seems reasonable since HOL---and ordinary
sets---are not equivariant.
Thus viewed through this translation, PNL and HOL and their models do
different things, but they enjoy non-trivial and rich subsystems which are
isomorphic
Closed nominal rewriting and efficiently computable nominal algebra equality
We analyse the relationship between nominal algebra and nominal rewriting,
giving a new and concise presentation of equational deduction in nominal
theories. With some new results, we characterise a subclass of equational
theories for which nominal rewriting provides a complete procedure to check
nominal algebra equality. This subclass includes specifications of the
lambda-calculus and first-order logic.Comment: In Proceedings LFMTP 2010, arXiv:1009.218
Nominal Unification from a Higher-Order Perspective
Nominal Logic is a version of first-order logic with equality, name-binding,
renaming via name-swapping and freshness of names. Contrarily to higher-order
logic, bindable names, called atoms, and instantiable variables are considered
as distinct entities. Moreover, atoms are capturable by instantiations,
breaking a fundamental principle of lambda-calculus. Despite these differences,
nominal unification can be seen from a higher-order perspective. From this
view, we show that nominal unification can be reduced to a particular fragment
of higher-order unification problems: Higher-Order Pattern Unification. This
reduction proves that nominal unification can be decided in quadratic
deterministic time, using the linear algorithm for Higher-Order Pattern
Unification. We also prove that the translation preserves most generality of
unifiers
Symbol correspondences for spin systems
The present monograph explores the correspondence between quantum and
classical mechanics in the particular context of spin systems, that is,
SU(2)-symmetric mechanical systems. Here, a detailed presentation of quantum
spin-j systems, with emphasis on the SO(3)-invariant decomposition of their
operator algebras, is followed by an introduction to the Poisson algebra of the
classical spin system and a similarly detailed presentation of its
SO(3)-invariant decomposition. Subsequently, this monograph proceeds with a
detailed and systematic study of general quantum-classical symbol
correspondences for spin-j systems and their induced twisted products of
functions on the 2-sphere. This original systematic presentation culminates
with the study of twisted products in the asymptotic limit of high spin
numbers. In the context of spin systems, it shows how classical mechanics may
or may not emerge as an asymptotic limit of quantum mechanics.Comment: Research Monograph, 171 pages (book format, preliminary version