1,715 research outputs found
Automatic Accuracy Prediction for AMR Parsing
Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) represents sentences as directed,
acyclic and rooted graphs, aiming at capturing their meaning in a machine
readable format. AMR parsing converts natural language sentences into such
graphs. However, evaluating a parser on new data by means of comparison to
manually created AMR graphs is very costly. Also, we would like to be able to
detect parses of questionable quality, or preferring results of alternative
systems by selecting the ones for which we can assess good quality. We propose
AMR accuracy prediction as the task of predicting several metrics of
correctness for an automatically generated AMR parse - in absence of the
corresponding gold parse. We develop a neural end-to-end multi-output
regression model and perform three case studies: firstly, we evaluate the
model's capacity of predicting AMR parse accuracies and test whether it can
reliably assign high scores to gold parses. Secondly, we perform parse
selection based on predicted parse accuracies of candidate parses from
alternative systems, with the aim of improving overall results. Finally, we
predict system ranks for submissions from two AMR shared tasks on the basis of
their predicted parse accuracy averages. All experiments are carried out across
two different domains and show that our method is effective.Comment: accepted at *SEM 201
Active learning and the Irish treebank
We report on our ongoing work in developing the Irish Dependency Treebank, describe the results of two Inter annotator Agreement (IAA) studies, demonstrate improvements in annotation consistency which have a knock-on effect on parsing accuracy, and present the final set of dependency labels. We then go on to investigate the extent to which active learning can play a role in treebank and parser development by comparing an active learning bootstrapping approach to a passive approach in which sentences are chosen at random for manual revision. We show that active learning outperforms passive learning, but when annotation effort is taken into account, it is not clear how much of an advantage the active learning approach has. Finally, we present results which suggest that adding automatic parses to the training data along with manually revised parses in an active learning setup does not greatly affect parsing accuracy
ULISSE: an unsupervised algorithm for detecting reliable dependency parses
In this paper we present ULISSE, an unsupervised linguistically--driven algorithm to select reliable parses from the output of a dependency parser. Different experiments were devised to show that the algorithm is robust enough to deal with the output of different parsers and with different languages, as well as to be used across different domains. In all cases, ULISSE appears to outperform the baseline algorithms
Learning Head-modifier Pairs to Improve Lexicalized Dependency Parsing on a Chinese Treebank
Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Treebanks and
Linguistic Theories.
Editors: Koenraad De Smedt, Jan HajiÄ and Sandra KĂźbler.
NEALT Proceedings Series, Vol. 1 (2007), 201-212.
Š 2007 The editors and contributors.
Published by
Northern European Association for Language
Technology (NEALT)
http://omilia.uio.no/nealt .
Electronically published at
Tartu University Library (Estonia)
http://hdl.handle.net/10062/4476
A Comprehensive Benchmark of Kernel Methods to Extract ProteinâProtein Interactions from Literature
The most important way of conveying new findings in biomedical research is scientific publication. Extraction of proteinâprotein interactions (PPIs) reported in scientific publications is one of the core topics of text mining in the life sciences. Recently, a new class of such methods has been proposed - convolution kernels that identify PPIs using deep parses of sentences. However, comparing published results of different PPI extraction methods is impossible due to the use of different evaluation corpora, different evaluation metrics, different tuning procedures, etc. In this paper, we study whether the reported performance metrics are robust across different corpora and learning settings and whether the use of deep parsing actually leads to an increase in extraction quality. Our ultimate goal is to identify the one method that performs best in real-life scenarios, where information extraction is performed on unseen text and not on specifically prepared evaluation data. We performed a comprehensive benchmarking of nine different methods for PPI extraction that use convolution kernels on rich linguistic information. Methods were evaluated on five different public corpora using cross-validation, cross-learning, and cross-corpus evaluation. Our study confirms that kernels using dependency trees generally outperform kernels based on syntax trees. However, our study also shows that only the best kernel methods can compete with a simple rule-based approach when the evaluation prevents information leakage between training and test corpora. Our results further reveal that the F-score of many approaches drops significantly if no corpus-specific parameter optimization is applied and that methods reaching a good AUC score often perform much worse in terms of F-score. We conclude that for most kernels no sensible estimation of PPI extraction performance on new text is possible, given the current heterogeneity in evaluation data. Nevertheless, our study shows that three kernels are clearly superior to the other methods
- âŚ