5 research outputs found
An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for Stanford Dependencies
Stanford typed dependencies are a widely desired representation of natural
language sentences, but parsing is one of the major computational bottlenecks
in text analysis systems. In light of the evolving definition of the Stanford
dependencies and developments in statistical dependency parsing algorithms,
this paper revisits the question of Cer et al. (2010): what is the tradeoff
between accuracy and speed in obtaining Stanford dependencies in particular? We
also explore the effects of input representations on this tradeoff:
part-of-speech tags, the novel use of an alternative dependency representation
as input, and distributional representaions of words. We find that direct
dependency parsing is a more viable solution than it was found to be in the
past. An accompanying software release can be found at:
http://www.ark.cs.cmu.edu/TBSDComment: 13 pages, 2 figure
Dependency parsing of learner English
Current syntactic annotation of large-scale learner corpora mainly resorts to “standard parsers” trained on native language data. Understanding how these parsers perform on learner data is important for downstream research and application related to learner language. This study evaluates the performance of multiple standard probabilistic parsers on learner English. Our contributions are three-fold. Firstly, we demonstrate that the common practice of constructing a gold standard – by manually correcting the pre-annotation of a single parser – can introduce bias to parser evaluation. We propose an alternative annotation method which can control for the annotation bias. Secondly, we quantify the influence of learner errors on parsing errors, and identify the learner errors that impact on parsing most. Finally, we compare the performance of the parsers on learner English and native English. Our results have useful implications on how to select a standard parser for learner English
An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for Stanford Dependencies
<p>Stanford typed dependencies are a widely desired representation of natural language sentences, but parsing is one of the major computational bottlenecks in text analysis systems. In light of the evolving definition of the Stanford dependencies and developments in statistical dependency parsing algorithms, this paper revisits the question of Cer et al. (2010): what is the tradeoff between accuracy and speed in obtaining Stanford dependencies in particular? We also explore the effects of input representations on this tradeoff: part-of-speech tags, the novel use of an alternative dependency representation as input, and distributional representaions of words. We find that direct dependency parsing is a more viable solution than it was found to be in the past.</p>
<p>An accompanying software release can be found at: http://www.ark.cs.cmu.edu/TBSD</p