3,814 research outputs found
Parameterized Complexity of Graph Constraint Logic
Graph constraint logic is a framework introduced by Hearn and Demaine, which
provides several problems that are often a convenient starting point for
reductions. We study the parameterized complexity of Constraint Graph
Satisfiability and both bounded and unbounded versions of Nondeterministic
Constraint Logic (NCL) with respect to solution length, treewidth and maximum
degree of the underlying constraint graph as parameters. As a main result we
show that restricted NCL remains PSPACE-complete on graphs of bounded
bandwidth, strengthening Hearn and Demaine's framework. This allows us to
improve upon existing results obtained by reduction from NCL. We show that
reconfiguration versions of several classical graph problems (including
independent set, feedback vertex set and dominating set) are PSPACE-complete on
planar graphs of bounded bandwidth and that Rush Hour, generalized to boards, is PSPACE-complete even when is at most a constant
Breaking Instance-Independent Symmetries In Exact Graph Coloring
Code optimization and high level synthesis can be posed as constraint
satisfaction and optimization problems, such as graph coloring used in register
allocation. Graph coloring is also used to model more traditional CSPs relevant
to AI, such as planning, time-tabling and scheduling. Provably optimal
solutions may be desirable for commercial and defense applications.
Additionally, for applications such as register allocation and code
optimization, naturally-occurring instances of graph coloring are often small
and can be solved optimally. A recent wave of improvements in algorithms for
Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and 0-1 Integer Linear Programming (ILP) suggests
generic problem-reduction methods, rather than problem-specific heuristics,
because (1) heuristics may be upset by new constraints, (2) heuristics tend to
ignore structure, and (3) many relevant problems are provably inapproximable.
Problem reductions often lead to highly symmetric SAT instances, and
symmetries are known to slow down SAT solvers. In this work, we compare several
avenues for symmetry breaking, in particular when certain kinds of symmetry are
present in all generated instances. Our focus on reducing CSPs to SAT allows us
to leverage recent dramatic improvement in SAT solvers and automatically
benefit from future progress. We can use a variety of black-box SAT solvers
without modifying their source code because our symmetry-breaking techniques
are static, i.e., we detect symmetries and add symmetry breaking predicates
(SBPs) during pre-processing.
An important result of our work is that among the types of
instance-independent SBPs we studied and their combinations, the simplest and
least complete constructions are the most effective. Our experiments also
clearly indicate that instance-independent symmetries should mostly be
processed together with instance-specific symmetries rather than at the
specification level, contrary to what has been suggested in the literature
- …