Re-Benchmarking Pool-Based Active Learning for Binary Classification

Active learning is a paradigm that significantly enhances the performance of machine learning models when acquiring labeled data is expensive. While several benchmarks exist for evaluating active learning strategies, their findings exhibit some misalignment. This discrepancy motivates us to develop a transparent and reproducible benchmark for the community. Our efforts result in an open-sourced implementation (https://github.com/ariapoy/active-learning-benchmark) that is reliable and extensible for future research. By conducting thorough re-benchmarking experiments, we have not only rectified misconfigurations in existing benchmark but also shed light on the under-explored issue of model compatibility, which directly causes the observed discrepancy. Resolving the discrepancy reassures that the uncertainty sampling strategy of active learning remains an effective and preferred choice for most datasets. Our experience highlights the importance of dedicating research efforts towards re-benchmarking existing benchmarks to produce more credible results and gain deeper insights

DMLR: Data-centric Machine Learning Research -- Past, Present and Future

Drawing from discussions at the inaugural DMLR workshop at ICML 2023 and meetings prior, in this report we outline the relevance of community engagement and infrastructure development for the creation of next-generation public datasets that will advance machine learning science. We chart a path forward as a collective effort to sustain the creation and maintenance of these datasets and methods towards positive scientific, societal and business impact.Comment: This editorial report accompanies the inaugural Data-centric Machine Learning Research (DMLR) Workshop that took place at ICML 2023 https://dmlr.ai

Low-Resource Active Learning of Morphological Segmentation

Peer reviewe

Human-Machine Collaboration for Fast Land Cover Mapping

We propose incorporating human labelers in a model fine-tuning system that provides immediate user feedback. In our framework, human labelers can interactively query model predictions on unlabeled data, choose which data to label, and see the resulting effect on the model's predictions. This bi-directional feedback loop allows humans to learn how the model responds to new data. Our hypothesis is that this rich feedback allows human labelers to create mental models that enable them to better choose which biases to introduce to the model. We compare human-selected points to points selected using standard active learning methods. We further investigate how the fine-tuning methodology impacts the human labelers' performance. We implement this framework for fine-tuning high-resolution land cover segmentation models. Specifically, we fine-tune a deep neural network -- trained to segment high-resolution aerial imagery into different land cover classes in Maryland, USA -- to a new spatial area in New York, USA. The tight loop turns the algorithm and the human operator into a hybrid system that can produce land cover maps of a large area much more efficiently than the traditional workflows. Our framework has applications in geospatial machine learning settings where there is a practically limitless supply of unlabeled data, of which only a small fraction can feasibly be labeled through human efforts.Comment: To appear in AAAI 202

Deep Active Learning for Classifying Cancer Pathology Reports

Background: Automated text classification has many important applications in the clinical setting; however, obtaining labelled data for training machine learning and deep learning models is often difficult and expensive. Active learning techniques may mitigate this challenge by reducing the amount of labelled data required to effectively train a model. In this study, we analyze the effectiveness of 11 active learning algorithms on classifying subsite and histology from cancer pathology reports using a Convolutional Neural Network as the text classification model. Results: We compare the performance of each active learning strategy using two differently sized datasets and two different classification tasks. Our results show that on all tasks and dataset sizes, all active learning strategies except diversity-sampling strategies outperformed random sampling, i.e., no active learning. On our large dataset (15K initial labelled samples, adding 15K additional labelled samples each iteration of active learning), there was no clear winner between the different active learning strategies. On our small dataset (1K initial labelled samples, adding 1K additional labelled samples each iteration of active learning), marginal and ratio uncertainty sampling performed better than all other active learning techniques. We found that compared to random sampling, active learning strongly helps performance on rare classes by focusing on underrepresented classes. Conclusions: Active learning can save annotation cost by helping human annotators efficiently and intelligently select which samples to label. Our results show that a dataset constructed using effective active learning techniques requires less than half the amount of labelled data to achieve the same performance as a dataset constructed using random sampling

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationMachine learning is the science of building predictive models from data that automatically improve based on past experience. To learn these models, traditional learning algorithms require labeled data. They also require that the entire dataset fits in the memory of a single machine. Labeled data are available or can be acquired for small and moderately sized datasets but curating large datasets can be prohibitively expensive. Similarly, massive datasets are usually too huge to fit into the memory of a single machine. An alternative is to distribute the dataset over multiple machines. Distributed learning, however, poses new challenges as most existing machine learning techniques are inherently sequential. Additionally, these distributed approaches have to be designed keeping in mind various resource limitations of real-world settings, prime among them being intermachine communication. With the advent of big datasets machine learning algorithms are facing new challenges. Their design is no longer limited to minimizing some loss function but, additionally, needs to consider other resources that are critical when learning at scale. In this thesis, we explore different models and measures for learning with limited resources that have a budget. What budgetary constraints are posed by modern datasets? Can we reuse or combine existing machine learning paradigms to address these challenges at scale? How does the cost metrics change when we shift to distributed models for learning? These are some of the questions that have been investigated in this thesis. The answers to these questions hold the key to addressing some of the challenges faced when learning on massive datasets. In the first part of this thesis, we present three different budgeted scenarios that deal with scarcity of labeled data and limited computational resources. The goal is to leverage transfer information from related domains to learn under budgetary constraints. Our proposed techniques comprise semisupervised transfer, online transfer and active transfer. In the second part of this thesis, we study distributed learning with limited communication. We present initial sampling based results, as well as, propose communication protocols for learning distributed linear classifiers