Inverse semigroup actions as groupoid actions

To an inverse semigroup, we associate an \'etale groupoid such that its actions on topological spaces are equivalent to actions of the inverse semigroup. Both the object and the arrow space of this groupoid are non-Hausdorff. We show that this construction provides an adjoint functor to the functor that maps a groupoid to its inverse semigroup of bisections, where we turn \'etale groupoids into a category using algebraic morphisms. We also discuss how to recover a groupoid from this inverse semigroup.Comment: Corrected a typo in Lemma 2.14 in the published versio

Dynamic actions on bridge slabs due to heavy vehicle impact on roadside barriers

The use of roadside safety barriers in Italy has changed in recent years: the number of installed devices has increased, and so have their stiffness and resistance. These changes were necessary because early barrier design was inadequate to contain and redirect heavy vehicles. The change in barrier design led to an increase in stiffness and resistance; consequently, the action transferred to the structure by the device increased. The need for resistance on the bridge slabs can be too high because the peculiar action of the roadside barriers was not adequately taken into account in the oldest bridge design codes. In addition, characterizing the actions transferred to the bridge slab is difficult because of the dynamic nature of vehicle impacts on roadside barriers. Given the impossibility of performing a full-scale laboratory test for every bridge deck, the use of computational mechanics applied to dynamic impact/interaction problems is one of the best ways to establish these actions in the project phase. Research was conducted into the use of a three-dimensional finite element model of the bridge slab-barrier-vehicle system to perform a numerical simulation of the impact, according to the procedure used for the roadside barrier homologation crash test, described in the European Standard EN 1317

Better Actions

We explain why compact U(1) confines and how to fix it. We show that plaquettes of negative trace carry most of the confinement signal in compact SU(2). We show how to perform noncompact gauge-invariant simulations without auxiliary fields. We suggest a way to simulate fermions without doublers.Comment: Talk presented at LATTICE96(algorithms), 4 pages, Latex, espcrc2, picte

Complementary actions

Complementary colors are color pairs which, when combined in the right proportions, produce white or black. Complementary actions refer here to forms of social interaction wherein individuals adapt their joint actions according to a common aim. Notably, complementary actions are incongruent actions. But being incongruent is not sufficient to be complementary (i.e., to complete the action of another person). Successful complementary interactions are founded on the abilities: (i) to simulate another person's movements, (ii) to predict another person's future action/s, (iii) to produce an appropriate incongruent response which differ, while interacting, with observed ones, and (iv) to complete the social interaction by integrating the predicted effects of one's own action with those of another person. This definition clearly alludes to the functional importance of complementary actions in the perception-action cycle and prompts us to scrutinize what is taking place behind the scenes. Preliminary data on this topic have been provided by recent cutting-edge studies utilizing different research methods. This mini-review aims to provide an up-to-date overview of the processes and the specific activations underlying complementary actions

Communicative Actions

Communicative actions in the broad sense of communicationattempts ­ are special cases of instrumental actions, i.e. actions by means of which one tries to achieve some ends, their differentia specifica being that in the case of communicative actions the speaker expects to achieve her primary (communicative) aim iff this aim is recognized by her addressee. In short, from the speaker's viewpoint communication coincides with understanding, where understanding is to be identified with recognition of the relevant speaker's intentions. This idea is, using some elementary formal machinery from intentional logic, expounded in more detail, related to proposals of Paul Grice's (speaker's meaning), and compared to the alternative approach of classical speech act theory