2,769 research outputs found
Cancer diagnosis using deep learning: A bibliographic review
In this paper, we first describe the basics of the field of cancer diagnosis, which includes steps of cancer diagnosis followed by the typical classification methods used by doctors, providing a historical idea of cancer classification techniques to the readers. These methods include Asymmetry, Border, Color and Diameter (ABCD) method, seven-point detection method, Menzies method, and pattern analysis. They are used regularly by doctors for cancer diagnosis, although they are not considered very efficient for obtaining better performance. Moreover, considering all types of audience, the basic evaluation criteria are also discussed. The criteria include the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), Area under the ROC curve (AUC), F1 score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, dice-coefficient, average accuracy, and Jaccard index. Previously used methods are considered inefficient, asking for better and smarter methods for cancer diagnosis. Artificial intelligence and cancer diagnosis are gaining attention as a way to define better diagnostic tools. In particular, deep neural networks can be successfully used for intelligent image analysis. The basic framework of how this machine learning works on medical imaging is provided in this study, i.e., pre-processing, image segmentation and post-processing. The second part of this manuscript describes the different deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), generative adversarial models (GANs), deep autoencoders (DANs), restricted Boltzmann’s machine (RBM), stacked autoencoders (SAE), convolutional autoencoders (CAE), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), long short-term memory (LTSM), multi-scale convolutional neural network (M-CNN), multi-instance learning convolutional neural network (MIL-CNN). For each technique, we provide Python codes, to allow interested readers to experiment with the cited algorithms on their own diagnostic problems. The third part of this manuscript compiles the successfully applied deep learning models for different types of cancers. Considering the length of the manuscript, we restrict ourselves to the discussion of breast cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and skin cancer. The purpose of this bibliographic review is to provide researchers opting to work in implementing deep learning and artificial neural networks for cancer diagnosis a knowledge from scratch of the state-of-the-art achievements
A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis
Deep learning algorithms, in particular convolutional networks, have rapidly
become a methodology of choice for analyzing medical images. This paper reviews
the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and
summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the
last year. We survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object
detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks and provide concise
overviews of studies per application area. Open challenges and directions for
future research are discussed.Comment: Revised survey includes expanded discussion section and reworked
introductory section on common deep architectures. Added missed papers from
before Feb 1st 201
Recurrent Saliency Transformation Network: Incorporating Multi-Stage Visual Cues for Small Organ Segmentation
We aim at segmenting small organs (e.g., the pancreas) from abdominal CT
scans. As the target often occupies a relatively small region in the input
image, deep neural networks can be easily confused by the complex and variable
background. To alleviate this, researchers proposed a coarse-to-fine approach,
which used prediction from the first (coarse) stage to indicate a smaller input
region for the second (fine) stage. Despite its effectiveness, this algorithm
dealt with two stages individually, which lacked optimizing a global energy
function, and limited its ability to incorporate multi-stage visual cues.
Missing contextual information led to unsatisfying convergence in iterations,
and that the fine stage sometimes produced even lower segmentation accuracy
than the coarse stage.
This paper presents a Recurrent Saliency Transformation Network. The key
innovation is a saliency transformation module, which repeatedly converts the
segmentation probability map from the previous iteration as spatial weights and
applies these weights to the current iteration. This brings us two-fold
benefits. In training, it allows joint optimization over the deep networks
dealing with different input scales. In testing, it propagates multi-stage
visual information throughout iterations to improve segmentation accuracy.
Experiments in the NIH pancreas segmentation dataset demonstrate the
state-of-the-art accuracy, which outperforms the previous best by an average of
over 2%. Much higher accuracies are also reported on several small organs in a
larger dataset collected by ourselves. In addition, our approach enjoys better
convergence properties, making it more efficient and reliable in practice.Comment: Accepted to CVPR 2018 (10 pages, 6 figures
Improving the Segmentation of Anatomical Structures in Chest Radiographs using U-Net with an ImageNet Pre-trained Encoder
Accurate segmentation of anatomical structures in chest radiographs is
essential for many computer-aided diagnosis tasks. In this paper we investigate
the latest fully-convolutional architectures for the task of multi-class
segmentation of the lungs field, heart and clavicles in a chest radiograph. In
addition, we explore the influence of using different loss functions in the
training process of a neural network for semantic segmentation. We evaluate all
models on a common benchmark of 247 X-ray images from the JSRT database and
ground-truth segmentation masks from the SCR dataset. Our best performing
architecture, is a modified U-Net that benefits from pre-trained encoder
weights. This model outperformed the current state-of-the-art methods tested on
the same benchmark, with Jaccard overlap scores of 96.1% for lung fields, 90.6%
for heart and 85.5% for clavicles.Comment: Presented at the First International Workshop on Thoracic Image
Analysis (TIA), MICCAI 201
- …