Inter-professional in-situ simulated team and resuscitation training for patient safety: Description and impact of a programmatic approach

© 2015 Zimmermann et al.Background: Inter-professional teamwork is key for patient safety and team training is an effective strategy to improve patient outcome. In-situ simulation is a relatively new strategy with emerging efficacy, but best practices for the design, delivery and implementation have yet to be evaluated. Our aim is to describe and evaluate the implementation of an inter-professional in-situ simulated team and resuscitation training in a teaching hospital with a programmatic approach. Methods: We designed and implemented a team and resuscitation training program according to Kerns six steps approach for curriculum development. General and specific needs assessments were conducted as independent cross-sectional surveys. Teamwork, technical skills and detection of latent safety threats were defined as specific objectives. Inter-professional in-situ simulation was used as educational strategy. The training was embedded within the workdays of participants and implemented in our highest acuity wards (emergency department, intensive care unit, intermediate care unit). Self-perceived impact and self-efficacy were sampled with an anonymous evaluation questionnaire after every simulated training session. Assessment of team performance was done with the team-based self-assessment tool TeamMonitor applying Van der Vleutens conceptual framework of longitudinal evaluation after experienced real events. Latent safety threats were reported during training sessions and after experienced real events. Results: The general and specific needs assessments clearly identified the problems, revealed specific training needs and assisted with stakeholder engagement. Ninety-five interdisciplinary staff members of the Childrens Hospital participated in 20 in-situ simulated training sessions within 2 years. Participant feedback showed a high effect and acceptance of training with reference to self-perceived impact and self-efficacy. Thirty-five team members experiencing 8 real critical events assessed team performance with TeamMonitor. Team performance assessment with TeamMonitor was feasible and identified specific areas to target future team training sessions. Training sessions as well as experienced real events revealed important latent safety threats that directed system changes. Conclusions: The programmatic approach of Kerns six steps for curriculum development helped to overcome barriers of design, implementation and assessment of an in-situ team and resuscitation training program. This approach may help improve effectiveness and impact of an in-situ simulated training program

Creation and validation of tool to assess resident competence in neonatal resuscitation

Background The American Board of Pediatrics requires that pediatricians be able to initiate stabilization of a newborn. After residency, 45% of general pediatricians routinely attend deliveries. However, there is no standard approach or tool to measure resident proficiency in newborn resuscitation across training programs. In a national survey, we found a large variability in faculty assessment of the amount of supervision trainees need for various resuscitation scenarios. Objective documentation of trainee performance would permit competency-based decisions on the level of supervision required and facilitate feedback on trainee performance. Methods A simplified tool was created following the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) algorithm, with emphasis on communication, leadership, knowledge of equipment, and initial stabilization. To achieve content validity, the tool was evaluated by the NRP steering committee. To assess internal structure of the tool, we filmed 10 simulated resuscitation scenarios 9 of which contained errors. Experienced resuscitation team members used the tool to assess performance of the team leader in the videos. To evaluate the response process, the tool was used to assess experienced resuscitators in real time at academic and non-academic sites. Results The NRP steering committee approved the tool, providing evidence of content validity. Performance of the team leader in the simulated videos was assessed by 16 evaluators using the tool. There was an intra-class coefficient of 0.86 showing excellent agreement. There was no statistical difference in scores between 102 resuscitations led by experienced resuscitators at academic and non-academic hospitals (p=0.98), which demonstrates generalizability. Conclusions The tool we have developed to assess performance in initiating newborn resuscitation shows evidence of construct validity based on assessment of content and internal structure (inter-observer agreement, response processes, and generalizability)

The development and testing of a training intervention designed to improve the acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills in ambulance paramedics

Despite several therapeutic advances in cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR), there has been little overall improvement in the out-of-hospital, cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival rates. Reports indicate that, although the incidence and outcome of OHCA vary across the globe, the median reported rates of survival at hospital discharge have remained below 10% for the 30 years preceding this study. One of the factors associated with this low survival rate is the deficient quality of the CPR provided during an OHCA by paramedics. Despite revised training standards, structured CPR training programmes and industry-regulated CPR refresher training schedules, paramedic-delivered CPR (pdCPR) during OHCAs is reported to be both inadequate and rarely in line with established resuscitation guidelines. International resuscitation bodies such as the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) postulate the need for tailored CPR training interventions in order to improve CPR performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a tailored pdCPR training intervention on pdCPR performance. The study was conducted in four phases and, using a mixed-method, multiphase design the study developed, implemented and evaluated the impact of a pdCPR training intervention which had been designed and tailored to improve the acquisition and retention of knowledge and skills by ambulance paramedics (AP). The primary outcome measure used in the study was the achievement of a competent rating which reflected the ability of the AP in question to perform high-quality, effective CPR as determined and evaluated by a 26 measure CPR Rapid Evaluation Tool predicated on variables derived from the globally accepted Cardiff list. Each of the 26 measures represented a treatment element within a pdCPR care bundle and which had been shown to contribute to successful resuscitation

Improving resuscitation : the role of design and teamwork

Resuscitation is the process medical teams use in an attempt to save a patient’s life when they have suffered a cardiopulmonary arrest. It is a stressful, time-pressured procedure, and unfortunately is often futile. Care of a patient in the emergency setting is particularly prone to errors and adverse events for a variety of reasons. These include the time-pressured decision making, increased rate of patient interventions, and the fact that teams are “assembled” by the emergency call that may have never worked together, or even met each other, before. Recent analysis of incident reports specifically from resuscitation attempts suggests that the majority of incidents relate to issues with the resuscitation team, problems related to human performance, and incidents relating to malfunctioning or absent equipment. One of the aims of this thesis is to look at ways to address these issues, and reduce rates of adverse events and critical incidents at resuscitation attempts. I will specifically look at the areas of non-technical teamworking skills, team training with environmental risk assessment, and the design of ergonomic equipment. In Chapter 4 I will describe the process of development and evaluation of a tool to assess non-technical teamworking skills in resuscitation teams. When this tool was initially developed, no other tools had been published. However, another tool has subsequently been made available, therefore in Chapter 5 I will compare our tool, OSCAR, with this other tool, called TEAM. In Chapter 6 I describe the process of in situ simulation for resuscitation training. I organised resuscitation team simulations as part of a training programme, and gathered participant feedback on the training. I also describe some of the unanticipated benefits of this training, such as risk assessment of the ward environment. In Chapters 7 and 8 I describe two studies that were undertaken to evaluate the newly designed Resus:Station. Specifically I assessed its use during simulated cardiac arrest scenarios, and when nursing staff performed a stock check of the trolley

Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect

BACKGROUND: Of 136 million babies born annually, around 10 million require assistance to breathe. Each year 814,000 neonatal deaths result from intrapartum-related events in term babies (previously "birth asphyxia") and 1.03 million from complications of prematurity. No systematic assessment of mortality reduction from tactile stimulation or resuscitation has been published. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the mortality effect of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation, and basic resuscitation on neonatal deaths due to term intrapartum-related events or preterm birth, for facility and home births. METHODS: We conducted systematic reviews for studies reporting relevant mortality or morbidity outcomes. Evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria adapted to provide a systematic approach to mortality effect estimates for the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). Meta-analysis was performed if appropriate. For interventions with low quality evidence but strong recommendation for implementation, a Delphi panel was convened to estimate effect size. RESULTS: We identified 24 studies of neonatal resuscitation reporting mortality outcomes (20 observational, 2 quasi-experimental, 2 cluster randomized controlled trials), but none of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation alone. A meta-analysis of three facility-based studies examined the effect of resuscitation training on intrapartum-related neonatal deaths (RR= 0.70, 95%CI 0.59-0.84); this estimate was used for the effect of facility-based basic neonatal resuscitation (additional to stimulation). The evidence for preterm mortality effect was low quality and thus expert opinion was sought. In community-based studies, resuscitation training was part of packages with multiple concurrent interventions, and/or studies did not distinguish term intrapartum-related from preterm deaths, hence no meta-analysis was conducted. Our Delphi panel of 18 experts estimated that immediate newborn assessment and stimulation would reduce both intrapartum-related and preterm deaths by 10%, facility-based resuscitation would prevent a further 10% of preterm deaths, and community-based resuscitation would prevent further 20% of intrapartum-related and 5% of preterm deaths. CONCLUSION: Neonatal resuscitation training in facilities reduces term intrapartum-related deaths by 30%. Yet, coverage of this intervention remains low in countries where most neonatal deaths occur and is a missed opportunity to save lives. Expert opinion supports smaller effects of neonatal resuscitation on preterm mortality in facilities and of basic resuscitation and newborn assessment and stimulation at community level. Further evaluation is required for impact, cost and implementation strategies in various contexts. FUNDING: This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through a grant to the US Fund for UNICEF, and to the Saving Newborn Lives program of Save the Children, through Save the Children US

Code Blue: methodology for a qualitative study of teamwork during simulated cardiac arrest.

IntroductionIn-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a particularly vexing entity from the perspective of preparedness, as it is neither common nor truly rare. Survival from IHCA requires the coordinated efforts of multiple providers with different skill sets who may have little prior experience working together. Survival rates have remained low despite advances in therapy, suggesting that human factors may be at play.Methods and analysisThis qualitative study uses a quasiethnographic data collection approach combining focus group interviews with providers involved in IHCA resuscitation as well as analysis of video recordings from in situ-simulated cardiac arrest events. Using grounded theory-based analysis, we intend to understand the organisational, interpersonal, cognitive and behavioural dimensions of IHCA resuscitation, and to build a descriptive model of code team functioning.Ethics and disseminationThis ongoing study has been approved by the IRB at UC Davis Medical Center.ResultsThe results will be disseminated in a subsequent manuscript