From 3D Models to 3D Prints: an Overview of the Processing Pipeline

Due to the wide diffusion of 3D printing technologies, geometric algorithms for Additive Manufacturing are being invented at an impressive speed. Each single step, in particular along the Process Planning pipeline, can now count on dozens of methods that prepare the 3D model for fabrication, while analysing and optimizing geometry and machine instructions for various objectives. This report provides a classification of this huge state of the art, and elicits the relation between each single algorithm and a list of desirable objectives during Process Planning. The objectives themselves are listed and discussed, along with possible needs for tradeoffs. Additive Manufacturing technologies are broadly categorized to explicitly relate classes of devices and supported features. Finally, this report offers an analysis of the state of the art while discussing open and challenging problems from both an academic and an industrial perspective.Comment: European Union (EU); Horizon 2020; H2020-FoF-2015; RIA - Research and Innovation action; Grant agreement N. 68044

Introducing a novel mesh following technique for approximation-free robotic tool path trajectories

Modern tools for designing and manufacturing of large components with complex geometries allow more flexible production with reduced cycle times. This is achieved through a combination of traditional subtractive approaches and new additive manufacturing processes. The problem of generating optimum tool-paths to perform specific actions (e.g. part manufacturing or inspection) on curved surface samples, through numerical control machinery or robotic manipulators, will be increasingly encountered. Part variability often precludes using original design CAD data directly for toolpath generation (especially for composite materials), instead surface mapping software is often used to generate tessellated models. However, such models differ from precise analytical models and are often not suitable to be used in current commercially available path-planning software, since they require formats where the geometrical entities are mathematically represented thus introducing approximation errors which propagate into the generated toolpath. This work adopts a fundamentally different approach to such surface mapping and presents a novel Mesh Following Technique (MFT) for the generation of tool-paths directly from tessellated models. The technique does not introduce any approximation and allows smoother and more accurate surface following tool-paths to be generated. The background mathematics to the new MFT algorithm are introduced and the algorithm is validated by testing through an application example. Comparative metrology experiments were undertaken to assess the tracking performance of the MFT algorithms, compared to tool-paths generated through commercial software. It is shown that the MFT tool-paths produced 40% smaller errors and up to 66% lower dispersion around the mean values

Automatic tool path generation for multi-axis machining

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 1998.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 67-72).We present a novel approach to CAD/CAM integration for multi-axis machining. Instead of redefining the workpiece in terms of machining features, we generate tool paths directly by analyzing the accessibility of the surface of the part. This eliminates the problem of feature extraction. We envision this as the core strategy of a new direct and seamless CAD/ CAM system. We perform the accessibility analysis in two stages. First, we triangulate the surface of the workpiece and perform a visibility analysis from a discrete set of orientations arranged on the Gaussian Sphere. This analysis is performed in object space to ensure reliability. For each triangle, a discrete set approximation of the accessibility cone is then constructed. Next, a minimum set cover algorithm like the Quine-McCluskey Algorithm is used to select the minimum set of orientations from which the entire workpiece can be accessed. These set of orientations correspond to the setups in the machining plan, and also dictate the orientation in which the designed part will be embedded in the stock. In particular, we bias the search for setups in favor of directions from which most of the part can be accessed i.e, the parallel and perpendicular directions of the faces in the workpiece. For each setup, we select a set of tools for optimal removal of material. Our tool-path generation strategy is based on two general steps: global roughing and facebased finishing. In global roughing, we represent the workpiece and stock in a voxelized format. We perform a waterline analysis and slice the stock into material removal slabs. In each slab, we generate zig-zag tool paths for removing bulk of the material. After gross material removal in global roughing, we finish the faces of the component in face-based finishing. Here, instead of assembling faces into features, we generate tool paths directly and independently for each face. The accessibility cones are used to help ensure interference- free cuts. After the tool paths have been generated, we optimize the plan to ensure that commonalities between adjacent faces are exploited.by Laxmiprasad Putta.S.M

Manufacturability analysis for non-feature-based objects

This dissertation presents a general methodology for evaluating key manufacturability indicators using an approach that does not require feature recognition, or feature-based design input. The contributions involve methods for computing three manufacturability indicators that can be applied in a hierarchical manner. The analysis begins with the computation of visibility, which determines the potential manufacturability of a part using material removal processes such as CNC machining. This manufacturability indicator is purely based on accessibility, without considering the actual machine setup and tooling. Then, the analysis becomes more specific by analyzing the complexity in setup planning for the part; i.e. how the part geometry can be oriented to a cutting tool in an accessible manner. This indicator establishes if the part geometry is accessible about an axis of rotation, namely, whether it can be manufactured on a 4th-axis indexed machining system. The third indicator is geometric machinability, which is computed for each machining operation to indicate the actual manufacturability when employing a cutting tool with specific shape and size. The three manufacturability indicators presented in this dissertation are usable as steps in a process; however they can be executed alone or hierarchically in order to render manufacturability information. At the end of this dissertation, a Multi-Layered Visibility Map is proposed, which would serve as a re-design mechanism that can guide a part design toward increased manufacturability

3-Axis and 5-Axis Machining with Stewart Platform

Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH

Lightweighting design optimisation for additively manufactured mirrors

Design for additive manufacture (AM; 3D printing) is significantly different than design for subtractive machining. Although there are some limitations on the designs that can be printed, the increase in the AM design-space removes some of the existing challenges faced by the traditional lightweight mirror designs; for example, sandwich mirrors are just as easy to fabricate as open-back mirrors via AM, and they provide an improvement in structural rigidity. However, the ability to print a sandwich mirror as a single component does come with extra considerations; such as orientation upon the build plate and access to remove any temporary support material. This paper describes the iterations in optimisation applied to the lightweighting of a small, 84 mm diameter by 20 mm height, spherical concave mirror intended for CubeSat applications. The initial design, which was fabricated, is discussed in terms of the internal lightweighting design and the design constraints that were imposed by printing and post-processing. Iterations on the initial design are presented; these include the use of topology optimisation to minimise the total internal strain energy during mirror polishing and the use of lattices combined with thickness variation i.e. having a thicker lattice in strategic support locations. To assess the suitability of each design, finite element analysis is presented to quantify the print-through of the lightweighting upon the optical surface for a given mass reduction

Automated Rapid Manufacturing Feedback for Design Considering Advanced Joining Processes

As manufacturing advancements continue to develop, designers must be able to consider these technologies during the design process. Unfortunately, many of these new technologies, such as additive and advanced joining, have many nuances that require expert knowledge to effectively apply. Additionally, new design techniques, such as topology optimization, allow users to create geometries that are traditionally not manufacturable. The approach presented in this thesis bridges the gap of expert knowledge between component design and a new advanced manufacturing technique, specifically linear friction welding to form monolithic components from multiple individual raw material blanks. The first step of the approach analyzes a part geometry to determine the unmachinable regions. This is done by converting an input tessellated shape into a voxelized solid and analyzing different axial cutting tool approach directions that could occur during a milling operation. Areas that the tool cannot access remain, which indicate regions of unmachinable solids. These solids are then used to determine areas where pre-joining machining could occur, taking advantage of the capabilities of linear friction welding. This is done using an existing part decomposition method while using a two-objective search optimizing total cost of manufacturing and total unmachinable volume. Decomposition configurations yield new set-ups of individual sub-volumes to determine unmachinable volume remaining and manufacturing plans are created by rebuilding the configurations to determine total cost of manufacturing. Results of the work demonstrate the ability to determine manufacturing plans and the potential tradeoffs of complex geometries, processing, and costs

A review of geometry representation and processing methods for cartesian and multiaxial robot-based additive manufacturing

Nowadays, robot-based additive manufacturing (RBAM) is emerging as a potential solution to increase manufacturing flexibility. Such technology allows to change the orientation of the material deposition unit during printing, making it possible to fabricate complex parts with optimized material distribution. In this context, the representation of parts geometries and their subsequent processing become aspects of primary importance. In particular, part orientation, multiaxial deposition, slicing, and infill strategies must be properly evaluated so as to obtain satisfactory outputs and avoid printing failures. Some advanced features can be found in commercial slicing software (e.g., adaptive slicing, advanced path strategies, and non-planar slicing), although the procedure may result excessively constrained due to the limited number of available options. Several approaches and algorithms have been proposed for each phase and their combination must be determined accurately to achieve the best results. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art works addressing the primary methods for the representation of geometries and the subsequent geometry processing for RBAM. For each category, tools and software found in the literature and commercially available are discussed. Comparison tables are then reported to assist in the selection of the most appropriate approaches. The presented review can be helpful for designers, researchers and practitioners to identify possible future directions and open issues