A Graph Based Backtracking Algorithm for Solving General CSPs

Many AI tasks can be formalized as constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), which involve finding values for variables subject to constraints. While solving a CSP is an NP-complete task in general, tractable classes of CSPs have been identified based on the structure of the underlying constraint graphs. Much effort has been spent on exploiting structural properties of the constraint graph to improve the efficiency of finding a solution. These efforts contributed to development of a class of CSP solving algorithms called decomposition algorithms. The strength of CSP decomposition is that its worst-case complexity depends on the structural properties of the constraint graph and is usually better than the worst-case complexity of search methods. Its practical application is limited, however, since it cannot be applied if the CSP is not decomposable. In this paper, we propose a graph based backtracking algorithm called omega-CDBT, which shares merits and overcomes the weaknesses of both decomposition and search approaches

Strategic directions in constraint programming

An abstract is not available

A data complexity and rewritability tetrachotomy of ontology-mediated queries with a covering axiom

Aiming to understand the data complexity of answering conjunctive queries mediated by an axiom stating that a class is covered by the union of two other classes, we show that deciding their first-order rewritability is PSPACE-hard and obtain a number of sufficient conditions for membership in AC0, L, NL, and P. Our main result is a complete syntactic AC0/NL/P/CONP tetrachotomy of path queries under the assumption that the covering classes are disjoint

Pseudo-contractions as Gentle Repairs

Updating a knowledge base to remove an unwanted consequence is a challenging task. Some of the original sentences must be either deleted or weakened in such a way that the sentence to be removed is no longer entailed by the resulting set. On the other hand, it is desirable that the existing knowledge be preserved as much as possible, minimising the loss of information. Several approaches to this problem can be found in the literature. In particular, when the knowledge is represented by an ontology, two different families of frameworks have been developed in the literature in the past decades with numerous ideas in common but with little interaction between the communities: applications of AGM-like Belief Change and justification-based Ontology Repair. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between pseudo-contraction operations and gentle repairs. Both aim to avoid the complete deletion of sentences when replacing them with weaker versions is enough to prevent the entailment of the unwanted formula. We show the correspondence between concepts on both sides and investigate under which conditions they are equivalent. Furthermore, we propose a unified notation for the two approaches, which might contribute to the integration of the two areas

A tetrachotomy of ontology-mediated queries with a covering axiom

Our concern is the problem of efficiently determining the data complexity of answering queries mediated by descrip- tion logic ontologies and constructing their optimal rewritings to standard database queries. Originated in ontology- based data access and datalog optimisation, this problem is known to be computationally very complex in general, with no explicit syntactic characterisations available. In this article, aiming to understand the fundamental roots of this difficulty, we strip the problem to the bare bones and focus on Boolean conjunctive queries mediated by a simple cov- ering axiom stating that one class is covered by the union of two other classes. We show that, on the one hand, these rudimentary ontology-mediated queries, called disjunctive sirups (or d-sirups), capture many features and difficulties of the general case. For example, answering d-sirups is Π2p-complete for combined complexity and can be in AC0 or L-, NL-, P-, or coNP-complete for data complexity (with the problem of recognising FO-rewritability of d-sirups be- ing 2ExpTime-hard); some d-sirups only have exponential-size resolution proofs, some only double-exponential-size positive existential FO-rewritings and single-exponential-size nonrecursive datalog rewritings. On the other hand, we prove a few partial sufficient and necessary conditions of FO- and (symmetric/linear-) datalog rewritability of d- sirups. Our main technical result is a complete and transparent syntactic AC0 / NL / P / coNP tetrachotomy of d-sirups with disjoint covering classes and a path-shaped Boolean conjunctive query. To obtain this tetrachotomy, we develop new techniques for establishing P- and coNP-hardness of answering non-Horn ontology-mediated queries as well as showing that they can be answered in NL

A tetrachotomy of ontology-mediated queries with a covering axiom

Our concern is the problem of efficiently determining the data complexity of answering queries mediated by descrip- tion logic ontologies and constructing their optimal rewritings to standard database queries. Originated in ontology- based data access and datalog optimisation, this problem is known to be computationally very complex in general, with no explicit syntactic characterisations available. In this article, aiming to understand the fundamental roots of this difficulty, we strip the problem to the bare bones and focus on Boolean conjunctive queries mediated by a simple cov- ering axiom stating that one class is covered by the union of two other classes. We show that, on the one hand, these rudimentary ontology-mediated queries, called disjunctive sirups (or d-sirups), capture many features and difficulties of the general case. For example, answering d-sirups is Π2p-complete for combined complexity and can be in AC0 or L-, NL-, P-, or coNP-complete for data complexity (with the problem of recognising FO-rewritability of d-sirups be- ing 2ExpTime-hard); some d-sirups only have exponential-size resolution proofs, some only double-exponential-size positive existential FO-rewritings and single-exponential-size nonrecursive datalog rewritings. On the other hand, we prove a few partial sufficient and necessary conditions of FO- and (symmetric/linear-) datalog rewritability of d- sirups. Our main technical result is a complete and transparent syntactic AC0 / NL / P / coNP tetrachotomy of d-sirups with disjoint covering classes and a path-shaped Boolean conjunctive query. To obtain this tetrachotomy, we develop new techniques for establishing P- and coNP-hardness of answering non-Horn ontology-mediated queries as well as showing that they can be answered in NL

The Effect of Representations on Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Constraint Satisfaction is used in the solution of a wide variety of important problems such as frequency assignment, code analysis, and scheduling. It is apparent that the modelling process is key to the success of any constraint based technique, and much work has been done on the identification of good models [FJHM05]. One of the key choices made during the modelling process is the selection of a constraint representation with which to express the constraints [HS02]. Whilst practitioners will commonly use an implicit representation, most existing structural tractability results are defined for explicit representation. We address a well-known anomaly in structural tractability theory, that acyclic instances are tractable when expressed explicitly, but may not be when expressed implicitly, and show that there is a link between representation and tractability, We introduce the notion of interaction width in order to address this disconnect between theory and practice, and use this to define new tractable classes by applying existing structural tractability results to different constraint representations, We show that for a given succinct representation, a non-trivial class of instances with bounded interaction width can be transformed into an explicit representation in polynomial time 50 that existing structural tractability results may be applied, We compare our work to existing results Cor alternative succinct representutions and show that the tractable classes we have defined arc incomparable and novel, and can be used to deduce new tractable classes for SAT. 3EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

A test for tractability

. Many combinatorial search problems can be expressed as `constraint satisfaction problems', and this class of problems is known to be NP-complete in general. In this paper we investigate restricted classes of constraints which give rise to tractable problems. We show that any set of constraints must satisfy a certain type of algebraic closure condition in order to avoid NP-completeness. We also describe a simple test which can be applied to establish whether a given set of constraints satisfies a condition of this kind. The test involves solving a particular constraint satisfaction problem, which we call an `indicator problem'. Keywords: Constraint satisfaction problem, complexity, NP-completeness, indicator problem 1 Introduction Solving a constraint satisfaction problem is known to be an NP-complete problem in general [13] even when the constraints are restricted to binary constraints. However, many of the problems which arise in practice have special properties which allow them t..

Implementing a test for tractability

The question of determining which sets of constraints give rise to NP-complete problems, and which give rise to tractable problems, is an important open problem in the theory of constraint satisfaction. It has been shown in previous papers that certain sufficient conditions for tractability and NP-completeness can be identified using algebraic properties of relations, and that these conditions can be tested by solving a particular form of constraint satisfaction problem (the so-called indicator problem). This paper describes a program which can solve the relevant indicator problems for arbitrary sets of constraints over small domains, and for some sets of constraints over larger domains. The main innovation in the program is its ability to deal with the many symmetries present in the problem; it also has the ability to preserve symmetries in cases where this speeds up the solution. Using this program, we have systematically investigated the complexity of all individual binary relations over a domain of size four or less, and of all individual ternary relations over a domain of size three or less. This automated analysis includes the derivation of more than 450 000 new NP-completeness results, and precisely identifies the small set of individual relations which cannot be classified as either tractable or NP-complete using the algebraic conditions presented in previous papers