A Novel Developed Supervised Machine Learning System For Classification And Prediction of Software Faults Using NASA Dataset

The software systems of modern computers are extremely complex and versatile. Therefore, it is essential to regularly detect and correct software design faults. In order to devote resources effectively towards the creation of trustworthy software, software companies are increasingly engaging in the practise of predicting fault-prone modules in advance of testing. These software fault prediction methods rely on the thoroughness with which prior software versions' fault as well as related code has been retrievedTime, energy, and money are all saved as a result. Increases the company's initial success and bottom line greatly by satisfying its clientele. Numerous academics have poured into this area throughout the years in an effort to raise the bar for all software. Nowadays, The most often used approaches in this field are those based on machine learning (ML). The field of ML seeks to perfect software capable of evolving as well as adapting in response to fresh data. This paper introduces a fresh approach for doing ML by bringing together a number of different expert systems. In order to reach agreement on which aspects of a software system need to be tested, the proposed multi-classifier model pools the strengths of the most effective classifiers. Several top-performing classifiers for defect prediction are put through their paces in an experiential evaluation. We test our method on 16 publicly available datasets from the NASA Metric Data Programme (MDP) repository at the promise repository. Parameters of confusion, recall, precision, recognition accuracy, etc., are evaluated and contrasted with existing schemes in a software analysis performed with the help of the python simulation tool with findings. The experimental outcomes demonstrate that by combining LGBM, XGBoost, and Voting classifiers, using a multi classifier approach, we are capable to significantly improve software fault prediction performance. The results of the investigation show that the suggested method will lead to better practical outcomes in the prediction of device failures

Demonstration of a Response Time Based Remaining Useful Life (RUL) Prediction for Software Systems

Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) has been widely applied to hardware systems in the electronics and non-electronics domains but has not been explored for software. While software does not decay over time, it can degrade over release cycles. Software health management is confined to diagnostic assessments that identify problems, whereas prognostic assessment potentially indicates when in the future a problem will become detrimental. Relevant research areas such as software defect prediction, software reliability prediction, predictive maintenance of software, software degradation, and software performance prediction, exist, but all of these represent diagnostic models built upon historical data, none of which can predict an RUL for software. This paper addresses the application of PHM concepts to software systems for fault predictions and RUL estimation. Specifically, this paper addresses how PHM can be used to make decisions for software systems such as version update and upgrade, module changes, system reengineering, rejuvenation, maintenance scheduling, budgeting, and total abandonment. This paper presents a method to prognostically and continuously predict the RUL of a software system based on usage parameters (e.g., the numbers and categories of releases) and performance parameters (e.g., response time). The model developed has been validated by comparing actual data, with the results that were generated by predictive models. Statistical validation (regression validation, and k-fold cross validation) has also been carried out. A case study, based on publicly available data for the Bugzilla application is presented. This case study demonstrates that PHM concepts can be applied to software systems and RUL can be calculated to make system management decisions.Comment: This research methodology has opened up new and practical applications in the software domain. In the coming decades, we can expect a significant amount of attention and practical implementation in this area worldwid

Modeling software design diversity

Design diversity has been used for many years now as a means of achieving a degree of fault tolerance in software-based systems. Whilst there is clear evidence that the approach can be expected to deliver some increase in reliability compared with a single version, there is not agreement about the extent of this. More importantly, it remains difficult to evaluate exactly how reliable a particular diverse fault-tolerant system is. This difficulty arises because assumptions of independence of failures between different versions have been shown not to be tenable: assessment of the actual level of dependence present is therefore needed, and this is hard. In this tutorial we survey the modelling issues here, with an emphasis upon the impact these have upon the problem of assessing the reliability of fault tolerant systems. The intended audience is one of designers, assessors and project managers with only a basic knowledge of probabilities, as well as reliability experts without detailed knowledge of software, who seek an introduction to the probabilistic issues in decisions about design diversity

Reliability Assessment of Legacy Safety-Critical Systems Upgraded with Fault-Tolerant Off-the-Shelf Software

This paper presents a new way of applying Bayesian assessment to systems, which consist of many components. Full Bayesian inference with such systems is problematic, because it is computationally hard and, far more seriously, one needs to specify a multivariate prior distribution with many counterintuitive dependencies between the probabilities of component failures. The approach taken here is one of decomposition. The system is decomposed into partial views of the systems or part thereof with different degrees of detail and then a mechanism of propagating the knowledge obtained with the more refined views back to the coarser views is applied (recalibration of coarse models). The paper describes the recalibration technique and then evaluates the accuracy of recalibrated models numerically on contrived examples using two techniques: u-plot and prequential likelihood, developed by others for software reliability growth models. The results indicate that the recalibrated predictions are often more accurate than the predictions obtained with the less detailed models, although this is not guaranteed. The techniques used to assess the accuracy of the predictions are accurate enough for one to be able to choose the model giving the most accurate prediction

Assessing the Reliability of Diverse Fault-Tolerant Systems

Design diversity between redundant channels is a way of improving the dependability of software-based systems, but it does not alleviate the difficulties of dependability assessment

Assessing the reliability of diverse fault-tolerant software-based systems

We discuss a problem in the safety assessment of automatic control and protection systems. There is an increasing dependence on software for performing safety-critical functions, like the safety shut-down of dangerous plants. Software brings increased risk of design defects and thus systematic failures; redundancy with diversity between redundant channels is a possible defence. While diversity techniques can improve the dependability of software-based systems, they do not alleviate the difficulties of assessing whether such a system is safe enough for operation. We study this problem for a simple safety protection system consisting of two diverse channels performing the same function. The problem is evaluating its probability of failure in demand. Assuming failure independence between dangerous failures of the channels is unrealistic. One can instead use evidence from the observation of the whole system's behaviour under realistic test conditions. Standard inference procedures can then estimate system reliability, but they take no advantage of a system’s fault-tolerant structure. We show how to extend these techniques to take account of fault tolerance by a conceptually straightforward application of Bayesian inference. Unfortunately, the method is computationally complex and requires the conceptually difficult step of specifying 'prior' distributions for the parameters of interest. This paper presents the correct inference procedure, exemplifies possible pitfalls in its application and clarifies some non-intuitive issues about reliability assessment for fault-tolerant software