4 research outputs found
Costing JIT Traces
Tracing JIT compilation generates units of compilation that
are easy to analyse and are known to execute frequently. The AJITPar
project aims to investigate whether the information in JIT traces can be
used to make better scheduling decisions or perform code transformations
to adapt the code for a specific parallel architecture. To achieve this goal,
a cost model must be developed to estimate the execution time of an
individual trace.
This paper presents the design and implementation of a system for extracting
JIT trace information from the Pycket JIT compiler. We define
three increasingly parametric cost models for Pycket traces. We perform
a search of the cost model parameter space using genetic algorithms to
identify the best weightings for those parameters. We test the accuracy
of these cost models for predicting the cost of individual traces on a set
of loop-based micro-benchmarks. We also compare the accuracy of the
cost models for predicting whole program execution time over the Pycket
benchmark suite. Our results show that the weighted cost model
using the weightings found from the genetic algorithm search has the
best accuracy
Towards an Adaptive Skeleton Framework for Performance Portability
The proliferation of widely available, but very different, parallel architectures
makes the ability to deliver good parallel performance
on a range of architectures, or performance portability, highly desirable.
Irregularly-parallel problems, where the number and size
of tasks is unpredictable, are particularly challenging and require
dynamic coordination.
The paper outlines a novel approach to delivering portable parallel
performance for irregularly parallel programs. The approach
combines declarative parallelism with JIT technology, dynamic
scheduling, and dynamic transformation.
We present the design of an adaptive skeleton library, with a task
graph implementation, JIT trace costing, and adaptive transformations.
We outline the architecture of the protoype adaptive skeleton
execution framework in Pycket, describing tasks, serialisation,
and the current scheduler.We report a preliminary evaluation of the
prototype framework using 4 micro-benchmarks and a small case
study on two NUMA servers (24 and 96 cores) and a small cluster
(17 hosts, 272 cores). Key results include Pycket delivering good
sequential performance e.g. almost as fast as C for some benchmarks;
good absolute speedups on all architectures (up to 120 on
128 cores for sumEuler); and that the adaptive transformations do
improve performance
In search of a map : using program slicing to discover potential parallelism in recursive functions
Funding: EU FP7 grant “Parallel Patterns for Adaptive Heterogeneous Multicore Systems” (ICT-288570), by the EU H2020 grant “RePhrase: Refactoring Parallel Het- erogeneous Resource-Aware Applications – a Software Engineering Approach” (ICT-644235), by COST Action IC1202 (“Timing Analysis on Code-Level”), by the EPSRC grant “Discovery: Pattern Discovery and Program Shaping for Manycore Systems” (EP/P020631/1), and by Scottish Enterprise grant PS7305CA44.Recursion schemes, such as the well-known map, can be used as loci of potential parallelism, where schemes are replaced with an equivalent parallel implementation. This paper formalises a novel technique, using program slicing, that automatically and statically identifies computations in recursive functions that can be lifted out of the function and then potentially performed in parallel. We define a new program slicing algorithm, build a prototype implementation, and demonstrate its use on 12 Haskell examples, including benchmarks from the NoFib suite and functions from the standard Haskell Prelude. In all cases, we obtain the expected results in terms of finding potential parallelism. Moreover, we have tested our prototype against synthetic benchmarks, and found that our prototype has quadratic time complexity. For the NoFib benchmark examples we demonstrate that relative parallel speedups can be obtained (up to 32.93x the sequential performance on 56 hyperthreaded cores).Postprin