4,702 research outputs found

    On Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

    Full text link
    A set P of points in R^2 is n-universal, if every planar graph on n vertices admits a plane straight-line embedding on P. Answering a question by Kobourov, we show that there is no n-universal point set of size n, for any n>=15. Conversely, we use a computer program to show that there exist universal point sets for all n<=10 and to enumerate all corresponding order types. Finally, we describe a collection G of 7'393 planar graphs on 35 vertices that do not admit a simultaneous geometric embedding without mapping, that is, no set of 35 points in the plane supports a plane straight-line embedding of all graphs in G.Comment: Fixed incorrect numbers of universal point sets in the last par

    On a Tree and a Path with no Geometric Simultaneous Embedding

    Full text link
    Two graphs G1=(V,E1)G_1=(V,E_1) and G2=(V,E2)G_2=(V,E_2) admit a geometric simultaneous embedding if there exists a set of points P and a bijection M: P -> V that induce planar straight-line embeddings both for G1G_1 and for G2G_2. While it is known that two caterpillars always admit a geometric simultaneous embedding and that two trees not always admit one, the question about a tree and a path is still open and is often regarded as the most prominent open problem in this area. We answer this question in the negative by providing a counterexample. Additionally, since the counterexample uses disjoint edge sets for the two graphs, we also negatively answer another open question, that is, whether it is possible to simultaneously embed two edge-disjoint trees. As a final result, we study the same problem when some constraints on the tree are imposed. Namely, we show that a tree of depth 2 and a path always admit a geometric simultaneous embedding. In fact, such a strong constraint is not so far from closing the gap with the instances not admitting any solution, as the tree used in our counterexample has depth 4.Comment: 42 pages, 33 figure

    The Complexity of Simultaneous Geometric Graph Embedding

    Full text link
    Given a collection of planar graphs G1,,GkG_1,\dots,G_k on the same set VV of nn vertices, the simultaneous geometric embedding (with mapping) problem, or simply kk-SGE, is to find a set PP of nn points in the plane and a bijection ϕ:VP\phi: V \to P such that the induced straight-line drawings of G1,,GkG_1,\dots,G_k under ϕ\phi are all plane. This problem is polynomial-time equivalent to weak rectilinear realizability of abstract topological graphs, which Kyn\v{c}l (doi:10.1007/s00454-010-9320-x) proved to be complete for R\exists\mathbb{R}, the existential theory of the reals. Hence the problem kk-SGE is polynomial-time equivalent to several other problems in computational geometry, such as recognizing intersection graphs of line segments or finding the rectilinear crossing number of a graph. We give an elementary reduction from the pseudoline stretchability problem to kk-SGE, with the property that both numbers kk and nn are linear in the number of pseudolines. This implies not only the R\exists\mathbb{R}-hardness result, but also a 22Ω(n)2^{2^{\Omega (n)}} lower bound on the minimum size of a grid on which any such simultaneous embedding can be drawn. This bound is tight. Hence there exists such collections of graphs that can be simultaneously embedded, but every simultaneous drawing requires an exponential number of bits per coordinates. The best value that can be extracted from Kyn\v{c}l's proof is only 22Ω(n)2^{2^{\Omega (\sqrt{n})}}

    Simultaneous Embeddings with Few Bends and Crossings

    Full text link
    A simultaneous embedding with fixed edges (SEFE) of two planar graphs RR and BB is a pair of plane drawings of RR and BB that coincide when restricted to the common vertices and edges of RR and BB. We show that whenever RR and BB admit a SEFE, they also admit a SEFE in which every edge is a polygonal curve with few bends and every pair of edges has few crossings. Specifically: (1) if RR and BB are trees then one bend per edge and four crossings per edge pair suffice (and one bend per edge is sometimes necessary), (2) if RR is a planar graph and BB is a tree then six bends per edge and eight crossings per edge pair suffice, and (3) if RR and BB are planar graphs then six bends per edge and sixteen crossings per edge pair suffice. Our results improve on a paper by Grilli et al. (GD'14), which proves that nine bends per edge suffice, and on a paper by Chan et al. (GD'14), which proves that twenty-four crossings per edge pair suffice.Comment: Full version of the paper "Simultaneous Embeddings with Few Bends and Crossings" accepted at GD '1

    Graph Treewidth and Geometric Thickness Parameters

    Full text link
    Consider a drawing of a graph GG in the plane such that crossing edges are coloured differently. The minimum number of colours, taken over all drawings of GG, is the classical graph parameter "thickness". By restricting the edges to be straight, we obtain the "geometric thickness". By further restricting the vertices to be in convex position, we obtain the "book thickness". This paper studies the relationship between these parameters and treewidth. Our first main result states that for graphs of treewidth kk, the maximum thickness and the maximum geometric thickness both equal k/2\lceil{k/2}\rceil. This says that the lower bound for thickness can be matched by an upper bound, even in the more restrictive geometric setting. Our second main result states that for graphs of treewidth kk, the maximum book thickness equals kk if k2k \leq 2 and equals k+1k+1 if k3k \geq 3. This refutes a conjecture of Ganley and Heath [Discrete Appl. Math. 109(3):215-221, 2001]. Analogous results are proved for outerthickness, arboricity, and star-arboricity.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the "Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Graph Drawing" (GD '05), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3843:129-140, Springer, 2006. The full version was published in Discrete & Computational Geometry 37(4):641-670, 2007. That version contained a false conjecture, which is corrected on page 26 of this versio

    Single failure resiliency in greedy routing

    Get PDF
    Using greedy routing, network nodes forward packets towards neighbors which are closer to their destination. This approach makes greedy routers significantly more memory-efficient than traditional IP-routers using longest-prefix matching. Greedy embeddings map network nodes to coordinates, such that greedy routing always leads to the destination. Prior works showed that using a spanning tree of the network topology, greedy embeddings can be found in different metric spaces for any graph. However, a single link/node failure might affect the greedy embedding and causes the packets to reach a dead end. In order to cope with network failures, existing greedy methods require large resources and cause significant loss in the quality of the routing (stretch loss). We propose efficient recovery techniques which require very limited resources with minor effect on the stretch. As the proposed techniques are protection, the switch-over takes place very fast. Low overhead, simplicity and scalability of the methods make them suitable for large-scale networks. The proposed schemes are validated on large topologies with properties similar to the Internet. The performances of the schemes are compared with an existing alternative referred as gravity pressure routing
    corecore