5,526 research outputs found
Comparing and evaluating extended Lambek calculi
Lambeks Syntactic Calculus, commonly referred to as the Lambek calculus, was
innovative in many ways, notably as a precursor of linear logic. But it also
showed that we could treat our grammatical framework as a logic (as opposed to
a logical theory). However, though it was successful in giving at least a basic
treatment of many linguistic phenomena, it was also clear that a slightly more
expressive logical calculus was needed for many other cases. Therefore, many
extensions and variants of the Lambek calculus have been proposed, since the
eighties and up until the present day. As a result, there is now a large class
of calculi, each with its own empirical successes and theoretical results, but
also each with its own logical primitives. This raises the question: how do we
compare and evaluate these different logical formalisms? To answer this
question, I present two unifying frameworks for these extended Lambek calculi.
Both are proof net calculi with graph contraction criteria. The first calculus
is a very general system: you specify the structure of your sequents and it
gives you the connectives and contractions which correspond to it. The calculus
can be extended with structural rules, which translate directly into graph
rewrite rules. The second calculus is first-order (multiplicative
intuitionistic) linear logic, which turns out to have several other,
independently proposed extensions of the Lambek calculus as fragments. I will
illustrate the use of each calculus in building bridges between analyses
proposed in different frameworks, in highlighting differences and in helping to
identify problems.Comment: Empirical advances in categorial grammars, Aug 2015, Barcelona,
Spain. 201
Complexity Hierarchies Beyond Elementary
We introduce a hierarchy of fast-growing complexity classes and show its
suitability for completeness statements of many non elementary problems. This
hierarchy allows the classification of many decision problems with a
non-elementary complexity, which occur naturally in logic, combinatorics,
formal languages, verification, etc., with complexities ranging from simple
towers of exponentials to Ackermannian and beyond.Comment: Version 3 is the published version in TOCT 8(1:3), 2016. I will keep
updating the catalogue of problems from Section 6 in future revision
The First-Order Theory of Ground Tree Rewrite Graphs
We prove that the complexity of the uniform first-order theory of ground tree
rewrite graphs is in ATIME(2^{2^{poly(n)}},O(n)). Providing a matching lower
bound, we show that there is some fixed ground tree rewrite graph whose
first-order theory is hard for ATIME(2^{2^{poly(n)}},poly(n)) with respect to
logspace reductions. Finally, we prove that there exists a fixed ground tree
rewrite graph together with a single unary predicate in form of a regular tree
language such that the resulting structure has a non-elementary first-order
theory.Comment: accepted for Logical Methods in Computer Scienc
On the expressiveness and monitoring of metric temporal logic
It is known that Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) is strictly less expressive than the Monadic First-Order Logic of Order and Metric (FO[<, +1]) when interpreted over timed words; this remains true even when the time domain is bounded a priori. In this work, we present an extension of MTL with the same expressive power as FO[<, +1] over bounded timed words (and also, trivially, over time-bounded signals). We then show that expressive completeness also holds in the general (time-unbounded) case if we allow the use of rational constants q â Q in formulas. This extended version of MTL therefore yields a definitive real-time analogue of Kampâs theorem. As an application, we propose a trace-length independent monitoring procedure for our extension of MTL, the first such procedure in a dense real-time setting
Deterministic Automata for Unordered Trees
Automata for unordered unranked trees are relevant for defining schemas and
queries for data trees in Json or Xml format. While the existing notions are
well-investigated concerning expressiveness, they all lack a proper notion of
determinism, which makes it difficult to distinguish subclasses of automata for
which problems such as inclusion, equivalence, and minimization can be solved
efficiently. In this paper, we propose and investigate different notions of
"horizontal determinism", starting from automata for unranked trees in which
the horizontal evaluation is performed by finite state automata. We show that a
restriction to confluent horizontal evaluation leads to polynomial-time
emptiness and universality, but still suffers from coNP-completeness of the
emptiness of binary intersections. Finally, efficient algorithms can be
obtained by imposing an order of horizontal evaluation globally for all
automata in the class. Depending on the choice of the order, we obtain
different classes of automata, each of which has the same expressiveness as
CMso.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
Quantified CTL: Expressiveness and Complexity
While it was defined long ago, the extension of CTL with quantification over
atomic propositions has never been studied extensively. Considering two
different semantics (depending whether propositional quantification refers to
the Kripke structure or to its unwinding tree), we study its expressiveness
(showing in particular that QCTL coincides with Monadic Second-Order Logic for
both semantics) and characterise the complexity of its model-checking and
satisfiability problems, depending on the number of nested propositional
quantifiers (showing that the structure semantics populates the polynomial
hierarchy while the tree semantics populates the exponential hierarchy)
Conjunctive Query Answering for the Description Logic SHIQ
Conjunctive queries play an important role as an expressive query language
for Description Logics (DLs). Although modern DLs usually provide for
transitive roles, conjunctive query answering over DL knowledge bases is only
poorly understood if transitive roles are admitted in the query. In this paper,
we consider unions of conjunctive queries over knowledge bases formulated in
the prominent DL SHIQ and allow transitive roles in both the query and the
knowledge base. We show decidability of query answering in this setting and
establish two tight complexity bounds: regarding combined complexity, we prove
that there is a deterministic algorithm for query answering that needs time
single exponential in the size of the KB and double exponential in the size of
the query, which is optimal. Regarding data complexity, we prove containment in
co-NP
- âŠ