7,868 research outputs found
Monotone Projection Lower Bounds from Extended Formulation Lower Bounds
In this short note, we reduce lower bounds on monotone projections of
polynomials to lower bounds on extended formulations of polytopes. Applying our
reduction to the seminal extended formulation lower bounds of Fiorini, Massar,
Pokutta, Tiwari, & de Wolf (STOC 2012; J. ACM, 2015) and Rothvoss (STOC 2014;
J. ACM, 2017), we obtain the following interesting consequences.
1. The Hamiltonian Cycle polynomial is not a monotone subexponential-size
projection of the permanent; this both rules out a natural attempt at a
monotone lower bound on the Boolean permanent, and shows that the permanent is
not complete for non-negative polynomials in VNP under monotone
p-projections.
2. The cut polynomials and the perfect matching polynomial (or "unsigned
Pfaffian") are not monotone p-projections of the permanent. The latter, over
the Boolean and-or semi-ring, rules out monotone reductions in one of the
natural approaches to reducing perfect matchings in general graphs to perfect
matchings in bipartite graphs.
As the permanent is universal for monotone formulas, these results also imply
exponential lower bounds on the monotone formula size and monotone circuit size
of these polynomials.Comment: Published in Theory of Computing, Volume 13 (2017), Article 18;
Received: November 10, 2015, Revised: July 27, 2016, Published: December 22,
201
Log-concavity and lower bounds for arithmetic circuits
One question that we investigate in this paper is, how can we build
log-concave polynomials using sparse polynomials as building blocks? More
precisely, let be a
polynomial satisfying the log-concavity condition a\_i^2 \textgreater{} \tau
a\_{i-1}a\_{i+1} for every where \tau
\textgreater{} 0. Whenever can be written under the form where the polynomials have at most
monomials, it is clear that . Assuming that the
have only non-negative coefficients, we improve this degree bound to if \tau \textgreater{} 1,
and to if .
This investigation has a complexity-theoretic motivation: we show that a
suitable strengthening of the above results would imply a separation of the
algebraic complexity classes VP and VNP. As they currently stand, these results
are strong enough to provide a new example of a family of polynomials in VNP
which cannot be computed by monotone arithmetic circuits of polynomial size
Lower Bounds for Monotone Counting Circuits
A {+,x}-circuit counts a given multivariate polynomial f, if its values on
0-1 inputs are the same as those of f; on other inputs the circuit may output
arbitrary values. Such a circuit counts the number of monomials of f evaluated
to 1 by a given 0-1 input vector (with multiplicities given by their
coefficients). A circuit decides if it has the same 0-1 roots as f. We
first show that some multilinear polynomials can be exponentially easier to
count than to compute them, and can be exponentially easier to decide than to
count them. Then we give general lower bounds on the size of counting circuits.Comment: 20 page
On monotone circuits with local oracles and clique lower bounds
We investigate monotone circuits with local oracles [K., 2016], i.e.,
circuits containing additional inputs that can perform
unstructured computations on the input string . Let be
the locality of the circuit, a parameter that bounds the combined strength of
the oracle functions , and
be the set of -cliques and the set of complete -partite graphs,
respectively (similarly to [Razborov, 1985]). Our results can be informally
stated as follows.
1. For an appropriate extension of depth- monotone circuits with local
oracles, we show that the size of the smallest circuits separating
(triangles) and (complete bipartite graphs) undergoes two phase
transitions according to .
2. For , arbitrary depth, and , we
prove that the monotone circuit size complexity of separating the sets
and is , under a certain restrictive
assumption on the local oracle gates.
The second result, which concerns monotone circuits with restricted oracles,
extends and provides a matching upper bound for the exponential lower bounds on
the monotone circuit size complexity of -clique obtained by Alon and Boppana
(1987).Comment: Updated acknowledgements and funding informatio
Three Puzzles on Mathematics, Computation, and Games
In this lecture I will talk about three mathematical puzzles involving
mathematics and computation that have preoccupied me over the years. The first
puzzle is to understand the amazing success of the simplex algorithm for linear
programming. The second puzzle is about errors made when votes are counted
during elections. The third puzzle is: are quantum computers possible?Comment: ICM 2018 plenary lecture, Rio de Janeiro, 36 pages, 7 Figure
- …