3,622 research outputs found
A Linear Kernel for Planar Total Dominating Set
A total dominating set of a graph is a subset such
that every vertex in is adjacent to some vertex in . Finding a total
dominating set of minimum size is NP-hard on planar graphs and W[2]-complete on
general graphs when parameterized by the solution size. By the meta-theorem of
Bodlaender et al. [J. ACM, 2016], there exists a linear kernel for Total
Dominating Set on graphs of bounded genus. Nevertheless, it is not clear how
such a kernel can be effectively constructed, and how to obtain explicit
reduction rules with reasonably small constants. Following the approach of
Alber et al. [J. ACM, 2004], we provide an explicit kernel for Total Dominating
Set on planar graphs with at most vertices, where is the size of the
solution. This result complements several known constructive linear kernels on
planar graphs for other domination problems such as Dominating Set, Edge
Dominating Set, Efficient Dominating Set, Connected Dominating Set, or Red-Blue
Dominating Set.Comment: 33 pages, 13 figure
Explicit linear kernels via dynamic programming
Several algorithmic meta-theorems on kernelization have appeared in the last
years, starting with the result of Bodlaender et al. [FOCS 2009] on graphs of
bounded genus, then generalized by Fomin et al. [SODA 2010] to graphs excluding
a fixed minor, and by Kim et al. [ICALP 2013] to graphs excluding a fixed
topological minor. Typically, these results guarantee the existence of linear
or polynomial kernels on sparse graph classes for problems satisfying some
generic conditions but, mainly due to their generality, it is not clear how to
derive from them constructive kernels with explicit constants. In this paper we
make a step toward a fully constructive meta-kernelization theory on sparse
graphs. Our approach is based on a more explicit protrusion replacement
machinery that, instead of expressibility in CMSO logic, uses dynamic
programming, which allows us to find an explicit upper bound on the size of the
derived kernels. We demonstrate the usefulness of our techniques by providing
the first explicit linear kernels for -Dominating Set and -Scattered Set
on apex-minor-free graphs, and for Planar-\mathcal{F}-Deletion on graphs
excluding a fixed (topological) minor in the case where all the graphs in
\mathcal{F} are connected.Comment: 32 page
Towards optimal kernel for connected vertex cover in planar graphs
We study the parameterized complexity of the connected version of the vertex
cover problem, where the solution set has to induce a connected subgraph.
Although this problem does not admit a polynomial kernel for general graphs
(unless NP is a subset of coNP/poly), for planar graphs Guo and Niedermeier
[ICALP'08] showed a kernel with at most 14k vertices, subsequently improved by
Wang et al. [MFCS'11] to 4k. The constant 4 here is so small that a natural
question arises: could it be already an optimal value for this problem? In this
paper we answer this quesion in negative: we show a (11/3)k-vertex kernel for
Connected Vertex Cover in planar graphs. We believe that this result will
motivate further study in search for an optimal kernel
Tight Kernel Bounds for Problems on Graphs with Small Degeneracy
In this paper we consider kernelization for problems on d-degenerate graphs,
i.e. graphs such that any subgraph contains a vertex of degree at most .
This graph class generalizes many classes of graphs for which effective
kernelization is known to exist, e.g. planar graphs, H-minor free graphs, and
H-topological-minor free graphs. We show that for several natural problems on
d-degenerate graphs the best known kernelization upper bounds are essentially
tight.Comment: Full version of ESA 201
Kernelization and Sparseness: the case of Dominating Set
We prove that for every positive integer and for every graph class
of bounded expansion, the -Dominating Set problem admits a
linear kernel on graphs from . Moreover, when is only
assumed to be nowhere dense, then we give an almost linear kernel on for the classic Dominating Set problem, i.e., for the case . These
results generalize a line of previous research on finding linear kernels for
Dominating Set and -Dominating Set. However, the approach taken in this
work, which is based on the theory of sparse graphs, is radically different and
conceptually much simpler than the previous approaches.
We complement our findings by showing that for the closely related Connected
Dominating Set problem, the existence of such kernelization algorithms is
unlikely, even though the problem is known to admit a linear kernel on
-topological-minor-free graphs. Also, we prove that for any somewhere dense
class , there is some for which -Dominating Set is
W[]-hard on . Thus, our results fall short of proving a sharp
dichotomy for the parameterized complexity of -Dominating Set on
subgraph-monotone graph classes: we conjecture that the border of tractability
lies exactly between nowhere dense and somewhere dense graph classes.Comment: v2: new author, added results for r-Dominating Sets in bounded
expansion graph
Linear kernels for outbranching problems in sparse digraphs
In the -Leaf Out-Branching and -Internal Out-Branching problems we are
given a directed graph with a designated root and a nonnegative integer
. The question is to determine the existence of an outbranching rooted at
that has at least leaves, or at least internal vertices,
respectively. Both these problems were intensively studied from the points of
view of parameterized complexity and kernelization, and in particular for both
of them kernels with vertices are known on general graphs. In this
work we show that -Leaf Out-Branching admits a kernel with vertices
on -minor-free graphs, for any fixed family of graphs
, whereas -Internal Out-Branching admits a kernel with
vertices on any graph class of bounded expansion.Comment: Extended abstract accepted for IPEC'15, 27 page
- âŠ