2,910 research outputs found

    Deep learning in remote sensing: a review

    Get PDF
    Standing at the paradigm shift towards data-intensive science, machine learning techniques are becoming increasingly important. In particular, as a major breakthrough in the field, deep learning has proven as an extremely powerful tool in many fields. Shall we embrace deep learning as the key to all? Or, should we resist a 'black-box' solution? There are controversial opinions in the remote sensing community. In this article, we analyze the challenges of using deep learning for remote sensing data analysis, review the recent advances, and provide resources to make deep learning in remote sensing ridiculously simple to start with. More importantly, we advocate remote sensing scientists to bring their expertise into deep learning, and use it as an implicit general model to tackle unprecedented large-scale influential challenges, such as climate change and urbanization.Comment: Accepted for publication IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazin

    Representing Style by Feature Space Archetypes: Description and Emulation of Spatial Styles in an Architectural Context

    Get PDF

    DAugNet: Unsupervised, Multi-source, Multi-target, and Life-long Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Satellite Images

    Full text link
    The domain adaptation of satellite images has recently gained an increasing attention to overcome the limited generalization abilities of machine learning models when segmenting large-scale satellite images. Most of the existing approaches seek for adapting the model from one domain to another. However, such single-source and single-target setting prevents the methods from being scalable solutions, since nowadays multiple source and target domains having different data distributions are usually available. Besides, the continuous proliferation of satellite images necessitates the classifiers to adapt to continuously increasing data. We propose a novel approach, coined DAugNet, for unsupervised, multi-source, multi-target, and life-long domain adaptation of satellite images. It consists of a classifier and a data augmentor. The data augmentor, which is a shallow network, is able to perform style transfer between multiple satellite images in an unsupervised manner, even when new data are added over the time. In each training iteration, it provides the classifier with diversified data, which makes the classifier robust to large data distribution difference between the domains. Our extensive experiments prove that DAugNet significantly better generalizes to new geographic locations than the existing approaches

    μ΄ˆκ³ ν•΄μƒλ„ μ˜μƒ λΆ„λ₯˜λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ μˆœν™˜ μ λŒ€μ  생성 신경망 기반의 쀀지도 ν•™μŠ΅ ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사) -- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅λŒ€ν•™μ› : κ³΅κ³ΌλŒ€ν•™ κ±΄μ„€ν™˜κ²½κ³΅ν•™λΆ€, 2021.8. κΉ€μš©μΌ.고해상도 μ˜μƒ λΆ„λ₯˜λŠ” 토지피볡지도 μ œμž‘, 식생 λΆ„λ₯˜, λ„μ‹œ κ³„νš λ“±μ—μ„œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•˜κ²Œ ν™œμš©λ˜λŠ” λŒ€ν‘œμ μΈ μ˜μƒ 뢄석 κΈ°μˆ μ΄λ‹€. 졜근, 심측 ν•©μ„±κ³± 신경망 (deep convolutional neural network)은 μ˜μƒ λΆ„λ₯˜ λΆ„μ•Όμ—μ„œ 두각을 보여왔닀. 특히, 심측 ν•©μ„±κ³± 신경망 기반의 의미둠적 μ˜μƒ λΆ„ν•  (semantic segmentation) 기법은 μ—°μ‚° λΉ„μš©μ„ 맀우 κ°μ†Œμ‹œν‚€λ©°, μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 점은 μ§€μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ 고해상도 데이터가 μΆ•μ λ˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 고해상도 μ˜μƒμ„ 뢄석할 λ•Œ μ€‘μš”ν•˜κ²Œ μž‘μš©λœλ‹€. 심측 ν•™μŠ΅ (deep learning) 기반 기법이 μ•ˆμ •μ μΈ μ„±λŠ₯을 λ‹¬μ„±ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 일반적으둜 μΆ©λΆ„ν•œ μ–‘μ˜ 라벨링된 데이터 (labeled data)κ°€ ν™•λ³΄λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜, 원격탐사 λΆ„μ•Όμ—μ„œ 고해상도 μ˜μƒμ— λŒ€ν•œ 참쑰데이터λ₯Ό μ–»λŠ” 것은 λΉ„μš©μ μœΌλ‘œ μ œν•œμ μΈ κ²½μš°κ°€ λ§Žλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 문제λ₯Ό ν•΄κ²°ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” 라벨링된 μ˜μƒκ³Ό λΌλ²¨λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ μ˜μƒ (unlabeled image)을 ν•¨κ»˜ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜λŠ” 쀀지도 ν•™μŠ΅ ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬λ₯Ό μ œμ•ˆν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 이λ₯Ό 톡해 고해상도 μ˜μƒ λΆ„λ₯˜λ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” λΌλ²¨λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ μ˜μƒμ„ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œ κ°œμ„ λœ μˆœν™˜ μ λŒ€μ  생성 신경망 (CycleGAN) 방법을 μ œμ•ˆν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μˆœν™˜ μ λŒ€μ  생성 신경망은 μ˜μƒ λ³€ν™˜ λͺ¨λΈ (image translation model)둜 처음 μ œμ•ˆλ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 특히 μˆœν™˜ 일관성 손싀 ν•¨μˆ˜ (cycle consistency loss function)λ₯Ό 톡해 νŽ˜μ–΄λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ μ˜μƒ (unpaired image)을 λͺ¨λΈ ν•™μŠ΅μ— ν™œμš©ν•œ 연ꡬ이닀. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μˆœν™˜ 일관성 손싀 ν•¨μˆ˜μ— μ˜κ°μ„ λ°›μ•„, λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” λΌλ²¨λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ μ˜μƒμ„ 참쑰데이터와 νŽ˜μ–΄λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ λ°μ΄ν„°λ‘œ κ°„μ£Όν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 이λ₯Ό 톡해 λΌλ²¨λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ μ˜μƒμœΌλ‘œ λΆ„λ₯˜ λͺ¨λΈμ„ ν•¨κ»˜ ν•™μŠ΅μ‹œμΌ°λ‹€. μˆ˜λ§Žμ€ λΌλ²¨λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 데이터와 μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ 적은 라벨링된 데이터λ₯Ό ν•¨κ»˜ ν™œμš©ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄, λ³Έ 논문은 지도 ν•™μŠ΅κ³Ό κ°œμ„ λœ 쀀지도 ν•™μŠ΅ 기반의 μˆœν™˜ μ λŒ€μ  생성 신경망을 κ²°ν•©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ œμ•ˆλœ ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬λŠ” μˆœν™˜ κ³Όμ •(cyclic phase), μ λŒ€μ  κ³Όμ •(adversarial phase), 지도 ν•™μŠ΅ κ³Όμ •(supervised learning phase), μ„Έ 뢀뢄을 ν¬ν•¨ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 라벨링된 μ˜μƒμ€ 지도 ν•™μŠ΅ κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ λΆ„λ₯˜ λͺ¨λΈμ„ ν•™μŠ΅μ‹œν‚€λŠ” 데에 μ‚¬μš©λœλ‹€. μ λŒ€μ  κ³Όμ •κ³Ό 지도 ν•™μŠ΅ κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œλŠ” λΌλ²¨λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 데이터가 μ‚¬μš©λ  수 있으며, 이λ₯Ό 톡해 적은 μ–‘μ˜ μ°Έμ‘°λ°μ΄ν„°λ‘œ 인해 μΆ©λΆ„νžˆ ν•™μŠ΅λ˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•œ λΆ„λ₯˜ λͺ¨λΈμ„ μΆ”κ°€μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•™μŠ΅μ‹œν‚¨λ‹€. μ œμ•ˆλœ ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬μ˜ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” 곡곡 데이터인 ISPRS Vaihingen Dataset을 톡해 ν‰κ°€λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 정확도 검증을 μœ„ν•΄, μ œμ•ˆλœ ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬μ˜ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” 5개의 λ²€μΉ˜λ§ˆν¬λ“€ (benchmarks)κ³Ό λΉ„κ΅λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, μ΄λ•Œ μ‚¬μš©λœ 벀치마크 λͺ¨λΈλ“€μ€ 지도 ν•™μŠ΅κ³Ό 쀀지도 ν•™μŠ΅ 방법 λͺ¨λ‘λ₯Ό ν¬ν•¨ν•œλ‹€. 이에 더해, λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” 라벨링된 데이터와 λΌλ²¨λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ λ°μ΄ν„°μ˜ ꡬ성에 λ”°λ₯Έ 영ν–₯을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, λ‹€λ₯Έ λΆ„λ₯˜ λͺ¨λΈμ— λŒ€ν•œ λ³Έ ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬μ˜ μ μš©κ°€λŠ₯성에 λŒ€ν•œ 좔가적인 μ‹€ν—˜λ„ μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ œμ•ˆλœ ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬λŠ” λ‹€λ₯Έ λ²€μΉ˜λ§ˆν¬λ“€κ³Ό λΉ„κ΅ν•΄μ„œ κ°€μž₯ 높은 정확도 (μ„Έ μ‹€ν—˜ 지역에 λŒ€ν•΄ 0.796, 0.786, 0.784의 전체 정확도)λ₯Ό λ‹¬μ„±ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 특히, 객체의 ν¬κΈ°λ‚˜ λͺ¨μ–‘κ³Ό 같은 νŠΉμ„±μ΄ λ‹€λ₯Έ μ‹€ν—˜ μ§€μ—­μ—μ„œ κ°€μž₯ 큰 정확도 μƒμŠΉμ„ ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό 톡해 μ œμ•ˆλœ 쀀지도 ν•™μŠ΅μ΄ λͺ¨λΈμ„ μš°μˆ˜ν•˜κ²Œ μ •κ·œν™”(regularization)함을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, 쀀지도 ν•™μŠ΅μ„ 톡해 ν–₯μƒλ˜λŠ” μ •ν™•λ„λŠ” 라벨링된 데이터에 λΉ„ν•΄ λΌλ²¨λ§λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 데이터가 μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ λ§Žμ•˜μ„ λ•Œ κ·Έ 증가 폭이 λ”μš± μ»€μ‘Œλ‹€. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ, μ œμ•ˆλœ 쀀지도 ν•™μŠ΅ 기반의 μˆœν™˜ μ λŒ€μ  생성 신경망 기법이 UNet 외에도 FPNκ³Ό PSPNetμ΄λΌλŠ” λ‹€λ₯Έ λΆ„λ₯˜ λͺ¨λΈμ—μ„œλ„ μœ μ˜λ―Έν•œ 정확도 μƒμŠΉμ„ λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό 톡해 λ‹€λ₯Έ λΆ„λ₯˜ λͺ¨λΈμ— λŒ€ν•œ μ œμ•ˆλœ ν”„λ ˆμž„μ›Œν¬μ˜ μ μš©κ°€λŠ₯성을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€Image classification of Very High Resolution (VHR) images is a fundamental task in the remote sensing domain for various applications such as land cover mapping, vegetation mapping, and urban planning. In recent years, deep convolutional neural networks have shown promising performance in image classification studies. In particular, semantic segmentation models with fully convolutional architecture-based networks demonstrated great improvements in terms of computational cost, which has become especially important with the large accumulation of VHR images in recent years. However, deep learning-based approaches are generally limited by the need of a sufficient amount of labeled data to obtain stable accuracy, and acquiring reference labels of remotely-sensed VHR images is very labor-extensive and expensive. To overcome this problem, this thesis proposed a semi-supervised learning framework for VHR image classification. Semi-supervised learning uses both labeled and unlabeled data together, thus reducing the model’s dependency on data labels. To address this issue, this thesis employed a modified CycleGAN model to utilize large amounts of unlabeled images. CycleGAN is an image translation model which was developed from Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) for image generation. CycleGAN trains unpaired dataset by using cycle consistency loss with two generators and two discriminators. Inspired by the concept of cycle consistency, this thesis modified CycleGAN to enable the use of unlabeled VHR data in model training by considering the unlabeled images as images unpaired with their corresponding ground truth maps. To utilize a large amount of unlabeled VHR data and a relatively small amount of labeled VHR data, this thesis combined a supervised learning classification model with the modified CycleGAN architecture. The proposed framework contains three phases: cyclic phase, adversarial phase, and supervised learning phase. Through the three phase, both labeled and unlabeled data can be utilized simultaneously to train the model in an end-to-end manner. The result of the proposed framework was evaluated by using an open-source VHR image dataset, referred to as the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) Vaihingen dataset. To validate the accuracy of the proposed framework, benchmark models including both supervised and semi-supervised learning methods were compared on the same dataset. Furthermore, two additional experiments were conducted to confirm the impact of labeled and unlabeled data on classification accuracy and adaptation of the CycleGAN model for other classification models. These results were evaluated by the popular three metrics for image classification: Overall Accuracy (OA), F1-score, and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU). The proposed framework achieved the highest accuracy (OA: 0.796, 0.786, and 0.784, respectively in three test sites) in comparison to the other five benchmarks. In particular, in a test site containing numerous objects with various properties, the largest increase in accuracy was observed due to the regularization effect from the semi-supervised method using unlabeled data with the modified CycleGAN. Moreover, by controlling the amount of labeled and unlabeled data, results indicated that a relatively sufficient amount of unlabeled and labeled data is required to increase the accuracy when using the semi-supervised CycleGAN. Lastly, this thesis applied the proposed CycleGAN method to other classification models such as the feature pyramid network (FPN) and the pyramid scene parsing network (PSPNet), in place of UNet. In all cases, the proposed framework returned significantly improved results, displaying the framework’s applicability for semi-supervised image classification on remotely-sensed VHR images.1. Introduction 1 2. Background and Related Works 6 2.1. Deep Learning for Image Classification 6 2.1.1. Image-level Classifiaction 6 2.1.2. Fully Convolutional Architectures 7 2.1.3. Semantic Segmentation for Remote Sensing Images 9 2.2. Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) 12 2.2.1. Introduction to GAN 12 2.2.2. Image Translation 14 2.2.3. GAN for Semantic Segmentation 16 3. Proposed Framework 20 3.1. Modification of CycleGAN 22 3.2. Feed-forward Path of the Proposed Framework 23 3.2.1. Cyclic Phase 23 3.2.2. Adversarial Phase 23 3.2.3. Supervised Learning Phase 24 3.3. Loss Function for Back-propagation 25 3.4. Proposed Network Architecture 28 3.4.1. Generator Architecture 28 3.4.2. Discriminator Architecture 29 4. Experimental Design 31 4.1. Overall Workflow 33 4.2. Vaihingen Dataset 38 4.3. Implementation Details 40 4.4. Metrics for Quantitative Evaluation 41 5. Results and Discussion 42 5.1. Performance Evaluation of the Proposed Feamwork 42 5.2. Comparison of Classification Performance in the Proposed Framework and Benchmarks 45 5.3. Impact of labeled and Unlabeled Data for Semi-supervised Learning 52 5.4. Cycle Consistency in Semi-supervised Learning 55 5.5. Adaptation of the GAN Framework for Other Classification Models 59 6. Conclusion 62 Reference 65 κ΅­λ¬Έ 초둝 69석
    • …
    corecore