A Trust Based Congestion Aware Hybrid Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Energy Efficient Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks (TC-ACO)

Congestion is a problem of paramount importance in resource constrained Wireless Sensor Networks, especially for large networks, where the traffic loads exceed the available capacity of the resources. Sensor nodes are prone to failure and the misbehavior of these faulty nodes creates further congestion. The resulting effect is a degradation in network performance, additional computation and increased energy consumption, which in turn decreases network lifetime. Hence, the data packet routing algorithm should consider congestion as one of the parameters, in addition to the role of the faulty nodes and not merely energy efficient protocols. Unfortunately most of the researchers have tried to make the routing schemes energy efficient without considering congestion factor and the effect of the faulty nodes. In this paper we have proposed a congestion aware, energy efficient, routing approach that utilizes Ant Colony Optimization algorithm, in which faulty nodes are isolated by means of the concept of trust. The merits of the proposed scheme are verified through simulations where they are compared with other protocols.Comment: 6 pages, 5 figures and 2 tables (Conference Paper

Fuzzy uncertainty modelling for project planning; application to helicopter maintenance

Maintenance is an activity of growing interest specially for critical systems. Particularly, aircraft maintenance costs are becoming an important issue in the aeronautical industry. Managing an aircraft maintenance center is a complex activity. One of the difficulties comes from the numerous uncertainties that affect the activity and disturb the plans at short and medium term. Based on a helicopter maintenance planning and scheduling problem, we study in this paper the integration of uncertainties into tactical and operational multiresource, multi-project planning (respectively Rough Cut Capacity Planning and Resource Constraint Project Scheduling Problem). Our main contributions are in modelling the periodic workload on tactical level considering uncertainties in macro-tasks work contents, and modelling the continuous workload on operational level considering uncertainties in tasks durations. We model uncertainties by a fuzzy/possibilistic approach instead of a stochastic approach since very limited data are available. We refer to the problems as the Fuzzy RoughCut Capacity Problem (FRCCP) and the Fuzzy Resource Constraint Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP).We apply our models to helicopter maintenance activity within the frame of the Helimaintenance project, an industrial project approved by the French Aerospace Valley cluster which aims at building a center for civil helicopter maintenance

Short-term manpower management in manufacturing systems: new requirements and DSS prototyping

The short-term planning and scheduling of discrete manufacturing systems has mostly focused in the past on the management of machines, implicitly considered as the critical resources of the workshops. Some of the present schedulers claim to also manage human resources, but perform most of the time a local allocation of operators to machines, these operators having regular working hours. However, it seems clear that the workforce has a specificity that should be better taken into account by short-term planning facilities. Moreover, the variability of the weekly working hours through the year will shortly become a rule and not anymore an exception. On the base of a questionnaire answered by 19 French companies of different sizes and industrial sectors, we have tried to identify more precisely some industrial requirements concerning the short-term management of human resources. The growing interest in annualised hours together with the lack of software tools that allow to implement it practically is one of the results of this questionnaire. We suggest in this article the specification of a decision support system for short-term manpower management under annualised hours, taking into account the competence of the operators. A software prototype has been developed according to these specifications; the results of a simple but representative example are described

A review of discrete-time optimization models for tactical production planning

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published in International Journal of Production Research on 27 Mar 2014, available online: http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.899721[EN] This study presents a review of optimization models for tactical production planning. The objective of this research is to identify streams and future research directions in this field based on the different classification criteria proposed. The major findings indicate that: (1) the most popular production-planning area is master production scheduling with a big-bucket time-type period; (2) most of the considered limited resources correspond to productive resources and, to a lesser extent, to inventory capacities; (3) the consideration of backlogs, set-up times, parallel machines, overtime capacities and network-type multisite configuration stand out in terms of extensions; (4) the most widely used modelling approach is linear/integer/mixed integer linear programming solved with exact algorithms, such as branch-and-bound, in commercial MIP solvers; (5) CPLEX, C and its variants and Lindo/Lingo are the most popular development tools among solvers, programming languages and modelling languages, respectively; (6) most works perform numerical experiments with random created instances, while a small number of works were validated by real-world data from industrial firms, of which the most popular are sawmills, wood and furniture, automobile and semiconductors and electronic devices.This study has been funded by the Universitat Politècnica de València projects: ‘Material Requirement Planning Fourth Generation (MRPIV)’ (Ref. PAID-05-12) and ‘Quantitative Models for the Design of Socially Responsible Supply Chains under Uncertainty Conditions. Application of Solution Strategies based on Hybrid Metaheuristics’ (PAID-06-12).Díaz-Madroñero Boluda, FM.; Mula, J.; Peidro Payá, D. (2014). A review of discrete-time optimization models for tactical production planning. International Journal of Production Research. 52(17):5171-5205. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.899721S51715205521

Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier

[EN] This paper considers a real-world automobile second-tier supplier that manufactures decorative surface finishings of injected parts provided by several suppliers, and which devises its master production schedule by a manual spreadsheet-based procedure. The imprecise production time in this manufacturer's production process is incorporated into a deterministic mathematical programming model to address this problem by two robust optimization approaches. The proposed model and the corresponding robust solution methodology improve production plans by optimizing the production, inventory and backlogging costs, and demonstrate the their feasibility for a realistic master production schedule problem that outperforms the heuristic decision-making procedure currently being applied in the firm under study.Funding was provided by Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (Grant Agreement No. 636909) in the frame of the "Cloud Collaborative Manufacturing Networks" (C2NET) project.Martín, AG.; Díaz-Madroñero Boluda, FM.; Mula, J. (2020). Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier. Central European Journal of Operations Research. 28(1):143-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-019-00607-2S143166281Alem DJ, Morabito R (2012) Production planning in furniture settings via robust optimization. Comput Oper Res 39:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.02.022Aloulou MA, Dolgui A, Kovalyov MY (2014) A bibliography of non-deterministic lot-sizing models. Int J Prod Res 52:2293–2310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.855336As’ad R, Demirli K, Goyal SK (2015) Coping with uncertainties in production planning through fuzzy mathematical programming: application to steel rolling industry. Int J Oper Res 22:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2015.065937Atamturk A, Zhang M (2007) Two-stage robust network flow and design under demand uncertainty. Oper Res 55:662–673. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0428Aytac B, Wu SD (2013) Characterization of demand for short life-cycle technology products. Ann Oper Res 203:255–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0771-5Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1998) Robust convex optimization. Math Oper Res 23:769–805. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.23.4.769Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2000) Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math Program 88:411–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011380Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52:35–53. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1030.0065Caulkins JJ, Morrison E, Weidemann T (2007) Spreadsheet errors and decision making: evidence from field interviews. J Organ End User Comput 19:1–23Childerhouse P, Towill DR (2002) Analysis of the factors affecting real-world value stream performance. Int J Prod Res 40:3499–3518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540210152885Chu SCK (1995) A mathematical programming approach towards optimized master production scheduling. Int J Prod Econ 38:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(95)00015-GConlon JR (1976) Is your master production schedule feasible? Prod Invent Manag 17:56–63De La Vega J, Munari P, Morabito R (2017) Robust optimization for the vehicle routing problem with multiple deliverymen. Cent Eur J Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-017-0511-xDíaz-Madroñero M, Mula J, Jiménez M (2014a) Fuzzy goal programming for material requirements planning under uncertainty and integrity conditions. Int J Prod Res 52:6971–6988. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.920115Díaz-Madroñero M, Mula J, Peidro D (2014b) A review of discrete-time optimization models for tactical production planning. Int J Prod Res 52:5171–5205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.899721Díaz-Madroñero M, Peidro D, Mula J (2014c) A fuzzy optimization approach for procurement transport operational planning in an automobile supply chain. Appl Math Model 38:5705–5725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.053Dolgui A, Ben Ammar O, Hnaien F et al (2013) Supply planning and inventory control under lead time uncertainty: a review. Stud Inform Control 22:255–268Dzuranin AC, Slater RD (2014) Business risks all identified? If you’re using a spreadsheet, think again. J Corp Account Finance 25:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.21936Englberger J, Herrmann F, Manitz M (2016) Two-stage stochastic master production scheduling under demand uncertainty in a rolling planning environment. Int J Prod Res 54:6192–6215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1162917Gabrel V, Murat C, Thiele A (2014) Recent advances in robust optimization: an overview. Eur J Oper Res 235:471–483Gharakhani M, Taghipour T, Farahani KJ (2010) A robust multi-objective production planning. Int J Ind Eng Comput 1:73–78. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.01.007González JJ, Reeves GR (1983) Master production scheduling: a multiple-objective linear programming approach. Int J Prod Res 21:553–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207548308942390Gorissen BL, Yanıkoğlu İ, den Hertog D (2015) A practical guide to robust optimization. Omega 53:124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.12.006Grubbstrom RW, Tang O (2000) An overview of input-output analysis applied to production-inventory systems. Econ Syst Res 12:3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/095353100111254Grubbström RW, Bogataj M, Bogataj L (2010) Optimal lotsizing within MRP theory. Annu Rev Control 34:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARCONTROL.2010.02.004Haojie Y, Lixin M, Canrong Z (2017) Capacitated lot-sizing problem with one-way substitution: a robust optimization approach. In: In 2017 3rd international conference on information management (ICIM). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 159–163Kara G, Özmen A, Weber G-W (2017) Stability advances in robust portfolio optimization under parallelepiped uncertainty. Cent Eur J Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-017-0508-5Kawas B, Laumanns M, Pratsini E (2013) A robust optimization approach to enhancing reliability in production planning under non-compliance risks. OR Spectr 35:835–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-013-0339-2Kimms A (1998) Stability measures for rolling schedules with applications to capacity expansion planning, master production scheduling, and lot sizing. Omega 26:355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00056-XKo M, Tiwari A, Mehnen J (2010) A review of soft computing applications in supply chain management. Appl Soft Comput 10:661–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.09.004Körpeolu E, Yaman H, Selim Aktürk M (2011) A multi-stage stochastic programming approach in master production scheduling. Eur J Oper Res 213:166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.02.032Kovačić D, Bogataj M (2013) Reverse logistics facility location using cyclical model of extended MRP theory. Cent Eur J Oper Res 21:41–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-012-0251-xKuchta D (2011) A concept of a robust solution of a multicriterial linear programming problem. Cent Eur J Oper Res 19:605–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-010-0150-yLage Junior M, Godinho Filho M (2017) Master disassembly scheduling in a remanufacturing system with stochastic routings. Cent Eur J Oper Res 25:123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0428-1Lee SM, Moore LJ (1974) Practical approach to production scheduling. Prod Invent Manag J 15:79–92Lehtimaki AK (1987) Approach for solving decision planning of master scheduling by utilizing theory of fuzzy sets. Int J Prod Res 25:1781–1793Li Z, Li Z (2015) Optimal robust optimization approximation for chance constrained optimization problem. Comput Chem Eng 74:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.01.003Li Z, Ding R, Floudas CA (2011) A Comparative theoretical and computational study on robust counterpart optimization: I. Robust linear optimization and robust mixed integer linear optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:10567–10603. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie200150pLi Z, Tang Q, Floudas CA (2012) A comparative theoretical and computational study on robust counterpart optimization: II. Probabilistic guarantees on constraint satisfaction. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:6769–6788. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie201651sMula J, Poler R, Garcia-Sabater J, Lario F (2006a) Models for production planning under uncertainty: a review. Int J Prod Econ 103:271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.001Mula J, Poler R, Garcia JP (2006b) MRP with flexible constraints: a fuzzy mathematical programming approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:74–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.05.045Mula J, Poler R, Garcia-Sabater JP (2008) Capacity and material requirement planning modelling by comparing deterministic and fuzzy models. Int J Prod Res 46:5589–5606. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701413912Mulvey JM, Vanderbei RJ, Zenios SA (1995) Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Oper Res 43:264–281. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.43.2.264Nannapaneni S, Mahadevan S (2014) Uncertainty quantification in performance evaluation of manufacturing processes. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, pp 996–1005Ng TS, Fowler J (2007) Semiconductor production planning using robust optimization. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management. IEEE, pp 1073–1077Peidro D, Mula J, Poler RR, Lario F-C (2009) Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:400–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1715-yPochet Y, Wolsey LA (2006) Production planning by mixed integer programming. Springer, BerlinPowell SG, Baker KR, Lawson B (2008) A critical review of the literature on spreadsheet errors. Decis Support Syst 46:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.001Rahmani D, Ramezanian R, Fattahi P, Heydari M (2013) A robust optimization model for multi-product two-stage capacitated production planning under uncertainty. Appl Math Model 37:8957–8971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.016Sahinidis NV (2004) Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng 28:971–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.09.017Sakhaii M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Bagheri M, Vatani B (2015) A robust optimization approach for an integrated dynamic cellular manufacturing system and production planning with unreliable machines. Appl Math Model 40:169–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.05.005Soyster AL (1973) Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res 21:1154–1157. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.21.5.1154Supriyanto I, Noche B (2011) Fuzzy multi-objective linear programming and simulation approach to the development of valid and realistic master production schedule. Logist J. https://doi.org/10.2195/lj_proc_supriyanto_de_201108_01Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Sakhaii M, Vatani B et al (2014) A robust model for a dynamic cellular manufacturing system with production planning. Int J Eng 27:587–598. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ije.2014.27.04a.09Vargas V, Metters R (2011) A master production scheduling procedure for stochastic demand and rolling planning horizons. Int J Prod Econ 132:296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.025Wang J, Shu Y-F (2005) Fuzzy decision modeling for supply chain management. Fuzzy Sets Syst 150:107–127Weng ZK, Parlar M (2005) Managing build-to-order short life-cycle products: benefits of pre-season price incentives with standardization. J Oper Manag 23:482–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.10.008Werner R (2008) Cascading: an adjusted exchange method for robust conic programming. Cent Eur J Oper Res 16:179–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-007-0047-6Yu C-S, Li H-L (2000) A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems. Int J Prod Econ 64:385–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00074-

Optimal Analysis of Packaging Products of MAHEU Plant in Intafact Beverages Limited Using GPALS and MATLAB Optimization Software

This work focused on the optimization of the two packaging products; Supershake and Chibuku made up of three and two parts respectively. Copolymer polypropylene and white or colored batch materials are the two raw materials needed to produce the two packaging products. The manufacturing plan was developed for the organization. The production inputs of 1.11, 6.67, 15.78, 2.47 and 7.70 units were generated as the objective function coefficients; 308 hours per month for day shift and 364 hours per month for night shift were established. Production time of 10 seconds, 20 seconds, 12 second, 10 seconds and 12 seconds per unit of the five parts were established. The manufacturing constraints in terms of machine capacities, material availability, time and labour were extensively used to develop an integer linear programming model to obtain the optimum quantities of each part that will yield the maximum profit. The developed model was analyzed with GPALS and MATLAB optimization solver to obtain results for the linear programming model which gave a monthly production net profit of N3,751,932. A decision support system was developed for the manufacturing planning to assist the management of Maheu plant in Intafact Beverages Limited in decision making. The model is now being used in the manufacturing plan of the company and also recommended for application in organizations with similar production inputs. Keywords: Manufacturing plan, Production inputs, Manufacturing constraints,  Optimization, Profit and Decision makin

Tactical project planning under uncertainty: fuzzy approach

At the tactical planning level in a multi-project environment, uncertainties are inherent to the workloads, and costs may be involved for using non-regular capacity and violating project due dates. We propose an approach to identify whether non-regular capacities might be needed to meet the projects' due dates. This problem is known as rough-cut capacity planning (RCCP) problem under uncertainty. We propose a possibilistic approach, which is based on modelling uncertain workloads with fuzzy sets. We present the resulting fuzzy rough-cut capacity planning (FRCCP), and show that we can use the possibilistic approach to provide a robust solution with a fuzzy resource loading profile that supports managers in decision making. We provide a simulated annealing approach to solve the FRCCP, and test it against several existing RCCP approaches. For the experiments we use real life instances from a shipyard maintenance centre

A rolling horizon simulation approach for managing demand with lead time variability

[EN] This paper proposes a rolling horizon (RH) approach to deal with management problems under dynamic demand in planning horizons with variable lead times using system dynamics (SD) simulation. Thus, the nature of dynamic RH solutions entails no inconveniences to contemplate planning horizons with unpredictable demands. This is mainly because information is periodically updated and replanning is done in time. Therefore, inventory and logistic costs may be lower. For the first time, an RH is applied for demand management with variable lead times along with SD simulation models, which allowed the use of lot-sizing techniques to be evaluated (Wagner-Whitin and Silver-Meal). The basic scenario is based on a real-world example from an automotive single-level SC composed of a first-tier supplier and a car assembler that contemplates uncertain demands while planning the RH and 216 subscenarios by modifying constant and variable lead times, holding costs and order costs, combined with lot-sizing techniques. Twenty-eight more replications comprising 504 new subscenarios with variable lead times are generated to represent a relative variation coefficient of the initial demand. We conclude that our RH simulation approach, along with lot-sizing techniques, can generate more sustainable planning results in total costs, fill rates and bullwhip effect terms.This work was supported by the European Commission Horizon 2020 project Diverfarming [grant number 728003].Campuzano Bolarin, F.; Mula, J.; Díaz-Madroñero Boluda, FM.; Legaz-Aparicio, Á. (2020). A rolling horizon simulation approach for managing demand with lead time variability. International Journal of Production Research. 58(12):3800-3820. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1634849S380038205812Agaran, B., W. W. Buchanan, and M. K. Yurtseven. 2007. “Regulating Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains through Modern Control Theory.” in PICMET ‘07 – 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, 2391–2398. IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349573.Baker, K. R. (1977). AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ROLLING SCHEDULES IN PRODUCTION PLANNING. Decision Sciences, 8(1), 19-27. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1977.tb01065.xBhattacharya, R., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2010). A review of the causes of bullwhip effect in a supply chain. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9-12), 1245-1261. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2987-6Boulaksil, Y., Fransoo, J. C., & van Halm, E. N. G. (2007). Setting safety stocks in multi-stage inventory systems under rolling horizon mathematical programming models. OR Spectrum, 31(1). doi:10.1007/s00291-007-0086-3Brown, M. E., & Kshirsagar, V. (2015). Weather and international price shocks on food prices in the developing world. Global Environmental Change, 35, 31-40. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.003Campuzano, F., Mula, J., & Peidro, D. (2010). Fuzzy estimations and system dynamics for improving supply chains. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161(11), 1530-1542. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2009.12.002Campuzano-Bolarín, F., Mula, J., & Peidro, D. (2013). An extension to fuzzy estimations and system dynamics for improving supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 51(10), 3156-3166. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.760854De Sampaio, R. J. B., Wollmann, R. R. G., & Vieira, P. F. G. (2017). A flexible production planning for rolling-horizons. International Journal of Production Economics, 190, 31-36. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.003Díaz-Madroñero, M., Mula, J., & Jiménez, M. (2014). Fuzzy goal programming for material requirements planning under uncertainty and integrity conditions. International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 6971-6988. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.920115Díaz-Madroñero, M., Mula, J., & Peidro, D. (2017). A mathematical programming model for integrating production and procurement transport decisions. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 52, 527-543. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2017.08.009Disney, S. M., Naim, M. M., & Potter, A. (2004). Assessing the impact of e-business on supply chain dynamics. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(2), 109-118. doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(02)00464-4Dominguez, R., Cannella, S., & Framinan, J. M. (2015). The impact of the supply chain structure on bullwhip effect. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(23-24), 7309-7325. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.012Fransoo, J. C., & Wouters, M. J. F. (2000). Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(2), 78-89. doi:10.1108/13598540010319993Geary, S., Disney, S. M., & Towill, D. R. (2006). On bullwhip in supply chains—historical review, present practice and expected future impact. International Journal of Production Economics, 101(1), 2-18. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.009Giard, V., & Sali, M. (2013). The bullwhip effect in supply chains: a study of contingent and incomplete literature. International Journal of Production Research, 51(13), 3880-3893. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.754552Hosoda, T., & Disney, S. M. (2018). A unified theory of the dynamics of closed-loop supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1), 313-326. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.020Hussain, M., & Drake, P. R. (2011). Analysis of the bullwhip effect with order batching in multi‐echelon supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(10), 972-990. doi:10.1108/09600031111185248Jakšič, M., & Rusjan, B. (2008). The effect of replenishment policies on the bullwhip effect: A transfer function approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(3), 946-961. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.018Karimi, B., Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T., & Wilson, J. M. (2003). The capacitated lot sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms. Omega, 31(5), 365-378. doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(03)00059-8Li, J., Ghadge, A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2016). Impact of replenishment strategies on supply chain performance under e-shopping scenario. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 78-87. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.10.005Lian, Z., Liu, L., & Zhu, S. X. (2010). Rolling-horizon replenishment: Policies and performance analysis. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 57(6), 489-502. doi:10.1002/nav.20416D. Mendoza, J., Mula, J., & Campuzano-Bolarin, F. (2014). Using systems dynamics to evaluate the tradeoff among supply chain aggregate production planning policies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(8), 1055-1079. doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2012-0238Moreno, J. R., Mula, J., & Campuzano-Bolarin, F. (2015). Increasing the Equity of a Flower Supply Chain by Improving Order Management and Supplier Selection. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 14(2), 201-214. doi:10.2507/ijsimm14(2)2.284Mula, J., Peidro, D., & Poler, R. (2010). The effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supply chain production planning with fuzzy demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 136-143. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.007Mula, J., Poler, R., & Garcia, J. P. (2006). MRP with flexible constraints: A fuzzy mathematical programming approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(1), 74-97. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2005.05.045Mula, J., Poler, R., & Garcia-Sabater, J. P. (2007). Material Requirement Planning with fuzzy constraints and fuzzy coefficients. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158(7), 783-793. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2006.11.003Mula, J., Poler, R., & Garcia-Sabater, J. P. (2008). Capacity and material requirement planning modelling by comparing deterministic and fuzzy models. International Journal of Production Research, 46(20), 5589-5606. doi:10.1080/00207540701413912Ostberg, S., Schewe, J., Childers, K., & Frieler, K. (2018). Changes in crop yields and their variability at different levels of global warming. Earth System Dynamics, 9(2), 479-496. doi:10.5194/esd-9-479-2018Pacheco, E. de O., Cannella, S., Lüders, R., & Barbosa-Povoa, A. P. (2017). Order-up-to-level policy update procedure for a supply chain subject to market demand uncertainty. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 347-355. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.015Nyoman Pujawan, I. (2004). The effect of lot sizing rules on order variability. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(3), 617-635. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00419-3Rafiei, R., Nourelfath, M., Gaudreault, J., Santa-Eulalia, L. A., & Bouchard, M. (2013). A periodic re-planning approach for demand-driven wood remanufacturing industry: a real-scale application. International Journal of Production Research, 52(14), 4198-4215. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.869631Sahin, F., Narayanan, A., & Robinson, E. P. (2013). Rolling horizon planning in supply chains: review, implications and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18), 5413-5436. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.775523Sahin, F., & Robinson, E. P. (2002). Flow Coordination and Information Sharing in Supply Chains: Review, Implications, and Directions for Future Research. Decision Sciences, 33(4), 505-536. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01654.xSahin, F., & Robinson, E. P. (2004). Information sharing and coordination in make-to-order supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 23(6), 579-598. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.007Schmidt, M., Münzberg, B., & Nyhuis, P. (2015). Determining Lot Sizes in Production Areas – Exact Calculations versus Research Based Estimation. Procedia CIRP, 28, 143-148. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.024Simpson, N. . (1999). Multiple level production planning in rolling horizon assembly environments. European Journal of Operational Research, 114(1), 15-28. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00005-8Sridharan, S. V., Berry, W. L., & Udayabhanu, V. (1988). MEASURING MASTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULE STABILITY UNDER ROLLING PLANNING HORIZONS. Decision Sciences, 19(1), 147-166. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1988.tb00259.xTaylor, D. H., & Fearne, A. (2006). Towards a framework for improvement in the management of demand in agri‐food supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(5), 379-384. doi:10.1108/13598540610682381Van den Heuvel, W., & Wagelmans, A. P. M. (2005). A comparison of methods for lot-sizing in a rolling horizon environment. Operations Research Letters, 33(5), 486-496. doi:10.1016/j.orl.2004.10.001Vargas, V., & Metters, R. (2011). A master production scheduling procedure for stochastic demand and rolling planning horizons. International Journal of Production Economics, 132(2), 296-302. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.025Wagner, H. M., & Whitin, T. M. (1958). Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model. Management Science, 5(1), 89-96. doi:10.1287/mnsc.5.1.89WEMMERLÖV, U., & WHYBARK, D. C. (1984). Lot-sizing under uncertainty in a rolling schedule environment. International Journal of Production Research, 22(3), 467-484. doi:10.1080/00207548408942467Zhang, C., & Qu, X. (2015). The effect of global oil price shocks on China’s agricultural commodities. Energy Economics, 51, 354-364. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.07.01

A New Extended MILP MRP Approach to Production Planning and Its Application in the Jewelry Industry

It is important to manage reverse material flows such as recycling, reusing, and remanufacturing in a production environment. This paper addresses a production planning problem which involves reusing of scrap and recycling of waste that occur in the various stages of the production process and remanufacturing/recycling of returns in a closed-loop supply chain environment. An extended material requirement planning (MRP) is proposed as a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model which includes-beside forward-these reverse material flows. The proposed model is developed for the jewelry industry in Turkey, which uses gold as the primary resource of production. The aim is to manage these reverse material flows as a part of production planning to utilize resources. Considering the mostly unpredictable nature of reverse material flows, the proposed model is likewise transformed into a fuzzy model to provide a better review of production plan for the decision maker. The suggested model is examined through a case study to test the applicability and efficiency