Cost-efficient modeling of antenna structures using Gradient Enhanced Kriging

Reliable yet fast surrogate models are indispensable in the design of contemporary antenna structures. Data-driven models, e.g., based on Gaussian Processes or support-vector regression, offer sufficient flexibility and speed, however, their setup cost is large and grows very quickly with the dimensionality of the design space. In this paper, we propose cost-efficient modeling of antenna structures using Gradient-Enhanced Kriging. In our approach, the training data set contains, apart from the EM-simulation responses of the structure at hand, also derivative data at the respective training locations obtained at little extra cost using adjoint sensitivity techniques. We demonstrate that introduction of the derivative information into the model allows for considerable reduction of the model setup cost (in terms of the number of training points required) without compromising its predictive power. The Gradient-Enhanced Kriging technique is illustrated using a dielectric resonator antenna structure. Comparison with conventional Kriging interpolation is also provided

Variable-fidelity electromagnetic simulations and co-kriging for accurate modeling of antennas

Accurate and fast models are indispensable in contemporary antenna design. In this paper, we describe the low-cost antenna modeling methodology involving variable-fidelity electromagnetic (EM) simulations and co-Kriging. Our approach exploits sparsely sampled accurate (high-fidelity) EM data as well as densely sampled coarse-discretization (low-fidelity) EM simulations that are accommodated into one model using the co-Kriging technique. By using coarse-discretization simulations, the computational cost of creating the antenna model is greatly reduced compared to conventional approaches, where high-fidelity simulations are directly used to set up the model. At the same time, the modeling accuracy is not compromised. The proposed technique is demonstrated using three examples of antenna structures. Comparisons with conventional modeling based on high-fidelity data approximation, as well as applications for antenna design, are also discussed

State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods

Aerodynamic optimisation has become an indispensable component for any aerodynamic design over the past 60 years, with applications to aircraft, cars, trains, bridges, wind turbines, internal pipe flows, and cavities, among others, and is thus relevant in many facets of technology. With advancements in computational power, automated design optimisation procedures have become more competent, however, there is an ambiguity and bias throughout the literature with regards to relative performance of optimisation architectures and employed algorithms. This paper provides a well-balanced critical review of the dominant optimisation approaches that have been integrated with aerodynamic theory for the purpose of shape optimisation. A total of 229 papers, published in more than 120 journals and conference proceedings, have been classified into 6 different optimisation algorithm approaches. The material cited includes some of the most well-established authors and publications in the field of aerodynamic optimisation. This paper aims to eliminate bias toward certain algorithms by analysing the limitations, drawbacks, and the benefits of the most utilised optimisation approaches. This review provides comprehensive but straightforward insight for non-specialists and reference detailing the current state for specialist practitioners

Técnicas para el desarrollo de metamodelos aplicadas a problemas

Metamodels, also known as surrogate models, can be used in place of computationally expensive simulation models to increase computational efficiency for the purposes of design optimization or design space exploration. Metamodel-based design optimization is especially advantageous for ship design problems that require either computationally expensive simulations or costly physical experiments. In this paper, three metamodeling methods are evaluated with respect to their capabilities for modeling highly nonlinear, multimodal functions with incrementally increasing numbers of independent variables. Methods analyzed include kriging, radial basis functions (RBF), and support vector regression (SVR). Each metamodeling technique is used to model a set of single-output functions with dimensionality ranging from one to ten independent variables and modality ranging from one to twenty local maxima. The number of points used to train the models is increased until a predetermined error threshold is met. Results show that each of the three methods has its own distinct advantages.Los metamodelos, también conocimos como modelos substitutos, pueden ser utilizados en lugar de modeloscuyas simulaciones tienen un costo computacional muy alto, incrementado con esto la eficiencia en procesos de optimización de diseños o en el diseño de exploraciones espaciales. La optimización de diseños basados en metamodelos es especialmente ventajosa en problemas de diseño relacionado con vehículos marinos en los cuales serequieran simulaciones con un alto costo computacional o bien de experimentos con una alta inversión en equipos.En este artículo se evalúan tres métodos para el desarrollo de metamodelos. La evaluación de estos métodos es desarrollada teniendo en cuenta la capacidad de cada uno de ellos para modelar funciones multimodales no lineales con un número creciente de variables independientes. Dentro de los métodos analizados se encuentran el método de kriging, el método de funciones de base radiales, y el método de regresión con vector de apoyo. Cada una de las anteriores técnicas para la generación de metamodelos es utilizada para modelar un grupo de funciones de una salida con dimensiones variando desde uno hasta diez variables independientes y una modalidad variando entre uno y veinte máximos locales. El número de puntos utilizados para entrenar los modelos es incrementado hasta que el error alcanza una tolerancia predeterminada. Los resultados obtenidos muestran que cada uno de los tres modelos tiene sus propias ventajas distintivas

Automatic surrogate model type selection during the optimization of expensive black-box problems

The use of Surrogate Based Optimization (SBO) has become commonplace for optimizing expensive black-box simulation codes. A popular SBO method is the Efficient Global Optimization (EGO) approach. However, the performance of SBO methods critically depends on the quality of the guiding surrogate. In EGO the surrogate type is usually fixed to Kriging even though this may not be optimal for all problems. In this paper the authors propose to extend the well-known EGO method with an automatic surrogate model type selection framework that is able to dynamically select the best model type (including hybrid ensembles) depending on the data available so far. Hence, the expected improvement criterion will always be based on the best approximation available at each step of the optimization process. The approach is demonstrated on a structural optimization problem, i.e., reducing the stress on a truss-like structure. Results show that the proposed algorithm consequently finds better optimums than traditional kriging-based infill optimization