62,635 research outputs found
Mission drift in qualitative research, or moving toward a systematic review of qualitative studies, moving back to a more systematic narrative review
The paper argues that the systematic review of qualitative research is best served by reliance upon qualitative methods themselves. A case is made for strengthening the narrative literature review and using narrative itself as a method of review. A technique is proposed that builds upon recent developments in qualitative systematic review by the use of a narrative inductive method of analysis. The essence of qualitative work is described. The natural ability for issues of ethnicity and diversity to be investigated through a qualitative approach is elaborated. Recent developments in systematic review are delineated, including the Delphi and Signal and Noise techniques, inclusion of grey literature, scoping studies and meta-ethnography. A narrative inductive interpretive method to review qualitative research is proposed, using reflective teams to analyse documents. Narrative is suggested as a knowledge-generating method and its underlying hermeneutic approach is defended as providing validity and theoretical structure. Finally, qualities that distinguish qualitative research from more quantitative investigations are delineated. Starting points for reflecting on qualitative studies and their usefulness are listed. Key words: Qualitative Systematic Review, Evidence-Based Policy, Grey Literature, Scoping Studies, Delphi, âSignal and Noiseâ, Meta-ethnography, Narrative Review, Narrative Method, and Reflective Teams
A systematic review of speech recognition technology in health care
BACKGROUND To undertake a systematic review of existing literature relating to speech recognition technology and its application within health care. METHODS A systematic review of existing literature from 2000 was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were: all papers that referred to speech recognition (SR) in health care settings, used by health professionals (allied health, medicine, nursing, technical or support staff), with an evaluation or patient or staff outcomes. Experimental and non-experimental designs were considered. Six databases (Ebscohost including CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, OVID Technologies, PreMED-LINE, PsycINFO) were searched by a qualified health librarian trained in systematic review searches initially capturing 1,730 references. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were retained. RESULTS The heterogeneity of the studies made comparative analysis and synthesis of the data challenging resulting in a narrative presentation of the results. SR, although not as accurate as human transcription, does deliver reduced turnaround times for reporting and cost-effective reporting, although equivocal evidence of improved workflow processes. CONCLUSIONS SR systems have substantial benefits and should be considered in light of the cost and selection of the SR system, training requirements, length of the transcription task, potential use of macros and templates, the presence of accented voices or experienced and in-experienced typists, and workflow patterns.Funding for this study was provided by the University of Western Sydney.
NICTA is funded by the Australian Government through the Department of
Communications and the Australian Research Council through the ICT
Centre of Excellence Program. NICTA is also funded and supported by the
Australian Capital Territory, the New South Wales, Queensland and Victorian
Governments, the Australian National University, the University of New South
Wales, the University of Melbourne, the University of Queensland, the
University of Sydney, Griffith University, Queensland University of
Technology, Monash University and other university partners
Multi crteria decision making and its applications : a literature review
This paper presents current techniques used in Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and their applications. Two basic approaches for MCDM, namely Artificial Intelligence MCDM (AIMCDM) and Classical MCDM (CMCDM) are discussed and investigated. Recent articles from international journals related to MCDM are collected and analyzed to find which approach is more common than the other in MCDM. Also, which area these techniques are applied to. Those articles are appearing in journals for the year 2008 only. This paper provides evidence that currently, both AIMCDM and CMCDM are equally common in MCDM
Elicitability and backtesting: Perspectives for banking regulation
Conditional forecasts of risk measures play an important role in internal
risk management of financial institutions as well as in regulatory capital
calculations. In order to assess forecasting performance of a risk measurement
procedure, risk measure forecasts are compared to the realized financial losses
over a period of time and a statistical test of correctness of the procedure is
conducted. This process is known as backtesting. Such traditional backtests are
concerned with assessing some optimality property of a set of risk measure
estimates. However, they are not suited to compare different risk estimation
procedures. We investigate the proposal of comparative backtests, which are
better suited for method comparisons on the basis of forecasting accuracy, but
necessitate an elicitable risk measure. We argue that supplementing traditional
backtests with comparative backtests will enhance the existing trading book
regulatory framework for banks by providing the correct incentive for accuracy
of risk measure forecasts. In addition, the comparative backtesting framework
could be used by banks internally as well as by researchers to guide selection
of forecasting methods. The discussion focuses on three risk measures,
Value-at-Risk, expected shortfall and expectiles, and is supported by a
simulation study and data analysis
- âŠ