Coptic SCRIPTORIUM: Digitizing a Corpus for Interdisciplinary Research in Ancient Egyptian

Coptic, having evolved from the language of the hieroglyphs of the pharaonic era, represents the last phase of the Egyptian language and is pivotal for a wide range of disciplines, such as linguistics, biblical studies, the history of Christianity, Egyptology, and ancient history. The Coptic language has proven essential for the decipherment and continued study of Ancient Egyptian and is of major interest for Afro-Asiatic linguistics and Coptic linguistics in its own right. Coptic manuscripts are sources for biblical and extra-biblical texts and document ancient and Christian history. Coptic SCRIPTORIUM will advance knowledge in these fields by increasing access to now largely inaccessible texts of historical, religious, and linguistic significance. The project designs digital tools and methodologies and applies them to literary texts, creating a rich open-access corpus

Lynx: A knowledge-based AI service platform for content processing, enrichment and analysis for the legal domain

The EU-funded project Lynx focuses on the creation of a knowledge graph for the legal domain (Legal Knowledge Graph, LKG) and its use for the semantic processing, analysis and enrichment of documents from the legal domain. This article describes the use cases covered in the project, the entire developed platform and the semantic analysis services that operate on the documents. © 202

Towards an interoperable ecosystem of AI and LT platforms : a roadmap for the implementation of different levels of interoperability

With regard to the wider area of AI/LT platform interoperability, we concentrate on two core aspects: (1) cross-platform search and discovery of resources and services; (2) composition of cross-platform service workflows. We devise five different levels (of increasing complexity) of platform interoperability that we suggest to implement in a wider federation of AI/LT platforms. We illustrate the approach using the five emerging AI/LT platforms AI4EU, ELG, Lynx, QURATOR and SPEAKER

MetaGPT: Meta Programming for Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework

Recently, remarkable progress has been made in automated task-solving through the use of multi-agents driven by large language models (LLMs). However, existing works primarily focuses on simple tasks lacking exploration and investigation in complicated tasks mainly due to the hallucination problem. This kind of hallucination gets amplified infinitely as multiple intelligent agents interact with each other, resulting in failures when tackling complicated problems.Therefore, we introduce MetaGPT, an innovative framework that infuses effective human workflows as a meta programming approach into LLM-driven multi-agent collaboration. In particular, MetaGPT first encodes Standardized Operating Procedures (SOPs) into prompts, fostering structured coordination. And then, it further mandates modular outputs, bestowing agents with domain expertise paralleling human professionals to validate outputs and reduce compounded errors. In this way, MetaGPT leverages the assembly line work model to assign diverse roles to various agents, thus establishing a framework that can effectively and cohesively deconstruct complex multi-agent collaborative problems. Our experiments conducted on collaborative software engineering tasks illustrate MetaGPT's capability in producing comprehensive solutions with higher coherence relative to existing conversational and chat-based multi-agent systems. This underscores the potential of incorporating human domain knowledge into multi-agents, thus opening up novel avenues for grappling with intricate real-world challenges. The GitHub repository of this project is made publicly available on: https://github.com/geekan/MetaGP

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationManual annotation of clinical texts is often used as a method of generating reference standards that provide data for training and evaluation of Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems. Manually annotating clinical texts is time consuming, expensive, and requires considerable cognitive effort on the part of human reviewers. Furthermore, reference standards must be generated in ways that produce consistent and reliable data but must also be valid in order to adequately evaluate the performance of those systems. The amount of labeled data necessary varies depending on the level of analysis, the complexity of the clinical use case, and the methods that will be used to develop automated machine systems for information extraction and classification. Evaluating methods that potentially reduce cost, manual human workload, introduce task efficiencies, and reduce the amount of labeled data necessary to train NLP tools for specific clinical use cases are active areas of research inquiry in the clinical NLP domain. This dissertation integrates a mixed methods approach using methodologies from cognitive science and artificial intelligence with manual annotation of clinical texts. Aim 1 of this dissertation identifies factors that affect manual annotation of clinical texts. These factors are further explored by evaluating approaches that may introduce efficiencies into manual review tasks applied to two different NLP development areas - semantic annotation of clinical concepts and identification of information representing Protected Health Information (PHI) as defined by HIPAA. Both experiments integrate iv different priming mechanisms using noninteractive and machine-assisted methods. The main hypothesis for this research is that integrating pre-annotation or other machineassisted methods within manual annotation workflows will improve efficiency of manual annotation tasks without diminishing the quality of generated reference standards