Revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre evaluación de la e-salud

El propósito del documento es presentar una síntesis de los mecanismos para la medición de la e-Salud (definida como el uso de las TIC en el sector de la salud) publicados en la literatura científica como punto de partida para la elaboración de un modelo evaluativo que sirva como referencia para la medición de la e-Salud. Para lograr este propósito, se desarrolló una revisión sistemática de literatura de los documentos publicados entre los años 2004 y 2014 enfocada en los siguientes cinco objetivos, construir un marco conceptual que permita explicar qué es e-salud y sus características más importantes. planear la revisión sistemática, estableciendo las preguntas de investigación, el alcance de la revisión y los criterios a considerar para la selección y clasificación de los documentos, buscar los documentos en las bases de datos seleccionadas utilizando para ello una ecuación de búsqueda depurada, seleccionar los documentos a ser analizados a través de una evaluación de calidad de los mismos, realizar el análisis de los documentos seleccionados y presentar una síntesis de los resultados obtenidos, el principal resultado de este estudio fue la identificación de 22 procesos o frameworks de evaluación, 16 tipos de factores de evaluación, 11 tipos de variables y 6 tipos de indicadores para la medición de la e-Salud. También se encontraron 8 aspectos sometidos a evaluación, distribuidos en los documentos de la siguiente manera: 7.29% a la implementación, el 11.46% a la adopción, 3.13% a la factibilidad, el 11.46% a la satisfacción, el 9.38% a la calidad, el 26.04% al uso y el 35.42% a otros aspectos generales

The collection, linking and use of data in biomedical research and health care: ethical issues

This report takes as its starting point the massive accumulation of data in biomedical research and health care, and the increasing power of data science to extract value by linking and re-using that data, for example in further health or population research. It examines the scientific, policy and economic drivers to exploit these opportunities, and the concerns and potential risks associated with doing so. The faltering ability of conventional information governance measures to keep pace with these developments is identified as a significant problem. The report therefore poses and addresses the following question: "how can we define a set of morally reasonable expectations about the use of data in any given data initiative and what conditions are required to give sufficient confidence that those expectations will be satisfied?" The report sets out a number of general recommendations, including four guiding principles for ethical design and governance of data initiatives. These help to identify specific examples of existing good practice and to make recommendations for improved practice in the use of data in the fields of health care (re-use of NHS records, clinical research, etc.) and population research (biobanks, epidemiological studies, etc.)

The PERMIT Project: Personalised Renal Function Monitoring via Information Technology

Patients with heart failure are typically elderly and are among those most at risk of renal failure due to both their condition and their medication. Regular monitoring of renal function may allow early detection of renal decline and appropriate intervention to prevent renal failure. However, clinical guidance on renal function monitoring in heart failure is sparse and based on anecdotal evidence. To reduce unnecessary admissions caused by renal impairment in heart failure due to inadequate monitoring, standardised practice for renal monitoring would be of benefit. Given that each patient has individual co-morbidities and rates of renal decline, general guidelines may have minimal impact and there may be a need for renal monitoring that is personalised case-by-case. The aim of the PERMIT project (Personalised Renal Function Monitoring via Information Technology) was to develop the framework for creating such personalised guidance by using machine-learning on large clinical datasets. The goal was to create a prediction model that could highlight which patients with heart failure were most at risk of renal decline, in order to intervene before they required hospital admission. In light of developing a future predictive algorithm for use in clinical care, patient and clinician engagement with heart failure-related remote healthcare technologies was investigated. The aim of this was to improve the knowledge base so that future technologies, such as remote renal monitoring, can improve upon their accessibility and acceptability in this patient cohort. Studies examining remote care in heart failure were thematically synthesised in a qualitative systematic review. This generated 5 core themes of engagement: Clinical Care, Convenience, Communication, Ease of use, and Education, with different perspectives from patients and healthcare staff. The themes which were generated were assessed prospectively via a discrete-choice questionnaire survey given to heart failure patients (n=93). Binary logit analysis showed that ‘Clinical care’ was most valued by patients with heart failure and was almost twice as important as ‘Communication’, the lowest ranked theme. The study provided important insights into the lived experiences of patients with heart failure that will allow the development of future interventions with greater acceptability and engagement rates. To create the predictive model for renal decline, retrospective primary care data was obtained from SIR (Salford Integrated Records). This data was processed into a longitudinal dataset which included 3800 adult patients with newly diagnosed heart failure, over an 8.5 year study window. The clinical parameters of each patient were mapped longitudinally with creatinine over time. A model-based clustering algorithm known as ‘flexmix’ was applied to the data. In order to select appropriate clinical variables to input into the clustering predictive model, pairwise mixed-model linear regression was used to determine correlation between each clinical parameter and log(creatinine). The most correlative covariates were serum urea and serum potassium, with urea showing the highest R-squared value for explaining variance in creatinine over time. The final clustering model therefore used the inputs of: age at heart failure diagnosis; time since heart failure diagnosis; gender; IMD decile; and serum urea. This process produced seven discrete clusters of renal change over time which were ranked by severity. Evaluation of the algorithm was made using the assigned cluster models to predict creatinine over time in patients with heart failure. The MAPE (mean absolute percentage error) of the creatinine prediction was between 17-33% depending on the cluster assigned. The work outlined in this thesis represents an important step towards developing personalised renal monitoring guidance. Important clinical correlates of renal function decline, identified in the process, can be used for prognostic research in future studies. The error of the prediction values was variable and will thus require further optimisation using additional datasets and clinical studies in the future