7,856 research outputs found
Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal
The importance of a research article is routinely measured by counting how
many times it has been cited. However, treating all citations with equal weight
ignores the wide variety of functions that citations perform. We want to
automatically identify the subset of references in a bibliography that have a
central academic influence on the citing paper. For this purpose, we examine
the effectiveness of a variety of features for determining the academic
influence of a citation. By asking authors to identify the key references in
their own work, we created a data set in which citations were labeled according
to their academic influence. Using automatic feature selection with supervised
machine learning, we found a model for predicting academic influence that
achieves good performance on this data set using only four features. The best
features, among those we evaluated, were those based on the number of times a
reference is mentioned in the body of a citing paper. The performance of these
features inspired us to design an influence-primed h-index (the hip-index).
Unlike the conventional h-index, it weights citations by how many times a
reference is mentioned. According to our experiments, the hip-index is a better
indicator of researcher performance than the conventional h-index
Predicting Scientific Success Based on Coauthorship Networks
We address the question to what extent the success of scientific articles is
due to social influence. Analyzing a data set of over 100000 publications from
the field of Computer Science, we study how centrality in the coauthorship
network differs between authors who have highly cited papers and those who do
not. We further show that a machine learning classifier, based only on
coauthorship network centrality measures at time of publication, is able to
predict with high precision whether an article will be highly cited five years
after publication. By this we provide quantitative insight into the social
dimension of scientific publishing - challenging the perception of citations as
an objective, socially unbiased measure of scientific success.Comment: 21 pages, 2 figures, incl. Supplementary Materia
Name Disambiguation from link data in a collaboration graph using temporal and topological features
In a social community, multiple persons may share the same name, phone number
or some other identifying attributes. This, along with other phenomena, such as
name abbreviation, name misspelling, and human error leads to erroneous
aggregation of records of multiple persons under a single reference. Such
mistakes affect the performance of document retrieval, web search, database
integration, and more importantly, improper attribution of credit (or blame).
The task of entity disambiguation partitions the records belonging to multiple
persons with the objective that each decomposed partition is composed of
records of a unique person. Existing solutions to this task use either
biographical attributes, or auxiliary features that are collected from external
sources, such as Wikipedia. However, for many scenarios, such auxiliary
features are not available, or they are costly to obtain. Besides, the attempt
of collecting biographical or external data sustains the risk of privacy
violation. In this work, we propose a method for solving entity disambiguation
task from link information obtained from a collaboration network. Our method is
non-intrusive of privacy as it uses only the time-stamped graph topology of an
anonymized network. Experimental results on two real-life academic
collaboration networks show that the proposed method has satisfactory
performance.Comment: The short version of this paper has been accepted to ASONAM 201
Deep Learning: Our Miraculous Year 1990-1991
In 2020, we will celebrate that many of the basic ideas behind the deep
learning revolution were published three decades ago within fewer than 12
months in our "Annus Mirabilis" or "Miraculous Year" 1990-1991 at TU Munich.
Back then, few people were interested, but a quarter century later, neural
networks based on these ideas were on over 3 billion devices such as
smartphones, and used many billions of times per day, consuming a significant
fraction of the world's compute.Comment: 37 pages, 188 references, based on work of 4 Oct 201
- …