19,932 research outputs found
On the cost-complexity of multi-context systems
Multi-context systems provide a powerful framework for modelling
information-aggregation systems featuring heterogeneous reasoning components.
Their execution can, however, incur non-negligible cost. Here, we focus on
cost-complexity of such systems. To that end, we introduce cost-aware
multi-context systems, an extension of non-monotonic multi-context systems
framework taking into account costs incurred by execution of semantic operators
of the individual contexts. We formulate the notion of cost-complexity for
consistency and reasoning problems in MCSs. Subsequently, we provide a series
of results related to gradually more and more constrained classes of MCSs and
finally introduce an incremental cost-reducing algorithm solving the reasoning
problem for definite MCSs
Preferential Multi-Context Systems
Multi-context systems (MCS) presented by Brewka and Eiter can be considered
as a promising way to interlink decentralized and heterogeneous knowledge
contexts. In this paper, we propose preferential multi-context systems (PMCS),
which provide a framework for incorporating a total preorder relation over
contexts in a multi-context system. In a given PMCS, its contexts are divided
into several parts according to the total preorder relation over them,
moreover, only information flows from a context to ones of the same part or
less preferred parts are allowed to occur. As such, the first preferred
parts of an PMCS always fully capture the information exchange between contexts
of these parts, and then compose another meaningful PMCS, termed the
-section of that PMCS. We generalize the equilibrium semantics for an MCS to
the (maximal) -equilibrium which represents belief states at least
acceptable for the -section of an PMCS. We also investigate inconsistency
analysis in PMCS and related computational complexity issues
Belief Revision, Minimal Change and Relaxation: A General Framework based on Satisfaction Systems, and Applications to Description Logics
Belief revision of knowledge bases represented by a set of sentences in a
given logic has been extensively studied but for specific logics, mainly
propositional, and also recently Horn and description logics. Here, we propose
to generalize this operation from a model-theoretic point of view, by defining
revision in an abstract model theory known under the name of satisfaction
systems. In this framework, we generalize to any satisfaction systems the
characterization of the well known AGM postulates given by Katsuno and
Mendelzon for propositional logic in terms of minimal change among
interpretations. Moreover, we study how to define revision, satisfying the AGM
postulates, from relaxation notions that have been first introduced in
description logics to define dissimilarity measures between concepts, and the
consequence of which is to relax the set of models of the old belief until it
becomes consistent with the new pieces of knowledge. We show how the proposed
general framework can be instantiated in different logics such as
propositional, first-order, description and Horn logics. In particular for
description logics, we introduce several concrete relaxation operators tailored
for the description logic \ALC{} and its fragments \EL{} and \ELext{},
discuss their properties and provide some illustrative examples
A reasoning platform based on the MI Shapley inconsistency value
International audienceIn this paper we show how to build a reasoning platform us- ing an inconsistency value. The idea is to use an inconsistency value for evaluating how much each formula of the belief base is responsible of the inconsistency of the base. Then this evaluation allows us to obtain a strati cation (total pre-order) of the base, that can be used as the preferential input for di erent reasoning tasks, such as inference, belief revision, or conciliation. We show that the obtained operators are interesting and have good logical properties. We use as inconsistency value, the MI Shapley inconsistency value, that is known to have good properties, and that can be computed from minimal inconsistent subsets. We developed a java-based platform, that use the Sat4j library for computing the minimal inconsistent subsets, and that allows to have an e ective way to compute the MI Shapley inconsistent subsets. We implemented also several inference, revision and conciliation methods, that use this inconsistency value. So this provides a complete reasoning platform, that can be used for instance for academic purposes
Super Logic Programs
The Autoepistemic Logic of Knowledge and Belief (AELB) is a powerful
nonmonotic formalism introduced by Teodor Przymusinski in 1994. In this paper,
we specialize it to a class of theories called `super logic programs'. We argue
that these programs form a natural generalization of standard logic programs.
In particular, they allow disjunctions and default negation of arbibrary
positive objective formulas.
Our main results are two new and powerful characterizations of the static
semant ics of these programs, one syntactic, and one model-theoretic. The
syntactic fixed point characterization is much simpler than the fixed point
construction of the static semantics for arbitrary AELB theories. The
model-theoretic characterization via Kripke models allows one to construct
finite representations of the inherently infinite static expansions.
Both characterizations can be used as the basis of algorithms for query
answering under the static semantics. We describe a query-answering interpreter
for super programs which we developed based on the model-theoretic
characterization and which is available on the web.Comment: 47 pages, revised version of the paper submitted 10/200
- …