117 research outputs found
Formal representation and proof for cooperative games
In this contribution we present some work we have been doing in representing and proving theorems from the area of economics, and mainly we present work we will do in a project in which we will apply mechanised theorem proving tools to a class of economic problems for which very few general tools currently exist. For mechanised theorem proving, the research introduces the field to a new application domain with a large user base; more specifically, the researchers are collaborating with developers working on state-of-the-art theorem provers. For economics, the research will provide tools for handling a hard class of problems; more generally, as the first application of mechanised theorem proving to centrally involve economic theorists, it aims to properly introduce mechanised theorem proving techniques to the discipline.\u
The use of data-mining for the automatic formation of tactics
This paper discusses the usse of data-mining for the automatic formation of tactics. It was presented at the Workshop on Computer-Supported Mathematical Theory Development held at IJCAR in 2004. The aim of this project is to evaluate the applicability of data-mining techniques to the automatic formation of tactics from large corpuses of proofs. We data-mine information from large proof corpuses to find commonly occurring patterns. These patterns are then evolved into tactics using genetic programming techniques
Hipster: Integrating Theory Exploration in a Proof Assistant
This paper describes Hipster, a system integrating theory exploration with
the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. Theory exploration is a technique for
automatically discovering new interesting lemmas in a given theory development.
Hipster can be used in two main modes. The first is exploratory mode, used for
automatically generating basic lemmas about a given set of datatypes and
functions in a new theory development. The second is proof mode, used in a
particular proof attempt, trying to discover the missing lemmas which would
allow the current goal to be proved. Hipster's proof mode complements and
boosts existing proof automation techniques that rely on automatically
selecting existing lemmas, by inventing new lemmas that need induction to be
proved. We show example uses of both modes
The ForMaRE Project - Formal Mathematical Reasoning in Economics
The ForMaRE project applies formal mathematical reasoning to economics. We
seek to increase confidence in economics' theoretical results, to aid in
discovering new results, and to foster interest in formal methods, i.e.
computer-aided reasoning, within economics. To formal methods, we seek to
contribute user experience feedback from new audiences, as well as new
challenge problems. In the first project year, we continued earlier game theory
studies but then focused on auctions, where we are building a toolbox of
formalisations, and have started to study matching and financial risk.
In parallel to conducting research that connects economics and formal
methods, we organise events and provide infrastructure to connect both
communities, from fostering mutual awareness to targeted matchmaking. These
efforts extend beyond economics, towards generally enabling domain experts to
use mechanised reasoning.Comment: Conference on Intelligent Computer Mathematics, 8--12 July, Bath, UK.
Published as number 7961 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence,
Springe
Robust Computer Algebra, Theorem Proving, and Oracle AI
In the context of superintelligent AI systems, the term "oracle" has two
meanings. One refers to modular systems queried for domain-specific tasks.
Another usage, referring to a class of systems which may be useful for
addressing the value alignment and AI control problems, is a superintelligent
AI system that only answers questions. The aim of this manuscript is to survey
contemporary research problems related to oracles which align with long-term
research goals of AI safety. We examine existing question answering systems and
argue that their high degree of architectural heterogeneity makes them poor
candidates for rigorous analysis as oracles. On the other hand, we identify
computer algebra systems (CASs) as being primitive examples of domain-specific
oracles for mathematics and argue that efforts to integrate computer algebra
systems with theorem provers, systems which have largely been developed
independent of one another, provide a concrete set of problems related to the
notion of provable safety that has emerged in the AI safety community. We
review approaches to interfacing CASs with theorem provers, describe
well-defined architectural deficiencies that have been identified with CASs,
and suggest possible lines of research and practical software projects for
scientists interested in AI safety.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figure
Tableaux Modulo Theories Using Superdeduction
We propose a method that allows us to develop tableaux modulo theories using
the principles of superdeduction, among which the theory is used to enrich the
deduction system with new deduction rules. This method is presented in the
framework of the Zenon automated theorem prover, and is applied to the set
theory of the B method. This allows us to provide another prover to Atelier B,
which can be used to verify B proof rules in particular. We also propose some
benchmarks, in which this prover is able to automatically verify a part of the
rules coming from the database maintained by Siemens IC-MOL. Finally, we
describe another extension of Zenon with superdeduction, which is able to deal
with any first order theory, and provide a benchmark coming from the TPTP
library, which contains a large set of first order problems.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1501.0117
- …