Quantum Merlin-Arthur and proofs without relative phase

We study a variant of QMA where quantum proofs have no relative phase (i.e. non-negative amplitudes, up to a global phase). If only completeness is modified, this class is equal to QMA [arXiv:1410.2882]; but if both completeness and soundness are modified, the class (named QMA+ by Jeronimo and Wu) can be much more powerful. We show that QMA+ with some constant gap is equal to NEXP, yet QMA+ with some *other* constant gap is equal to QMA. One interpretation is that Merlin's ability to "deceive" originates from relative phase at least as much as from entanglement, since QMA(2) $\subseteq$ NEXP.Comment: 18 pages, 2 figure

Distributed Quantum Proofs for Replicated Data

This paper tackles the issue of checking that all copies of a large data set replicated at several nodes of a network are identical. The fact that the replicas may be located at distant nodes prevents the system from verifying their equality locally, i.e., by having each node consult only nodes in its vicinity. On the other hand, it remains possible to assign certificates to the nodes, so that verifying the consistency of the replicas can be achieved locally. However, we show that, as the replicated data is large, classical certification mechanisms, including distributed Merlin-Arthur protocols, cannot guarantee good completeness and soundness simultaneously, unless they use very large certificates. The main result of this paper is a distributed quantum Merlin-Arthur protocol enabling the nodes to collectively check the consistency of the replicas, based on small certificates, and in a single round of message exchange between neighbors, with short messages. In particular, the certificate-size is logarithmic in the size of the data set, which gives an exponential advantage over classical certification mechanisms. We propose yet another usage of a fundamental quantum primitive, called the SWAP test, in order to show our main result

Quantum Space, Ground Space Traversal, and How to Embed Multi-Prover Interactive Proofs into Unentanglement

Savitch's theorem states that NPSPACE computations can be simulated in PSPACE. We initiate the study of a quantum analogue of NPSPACE, denoted Streaming-QCMASPACE (SQCMASPACE), where an exponentially long classical proof is streamed to a poly-space quantum verifier. Besides two main results, we also show that a quantum analogue of Savitch's theorem is unlikely to hold, as SQCMASPACE=NEXP. For completeness, we introduce Streaming-QMASPACE (SQMASPACE) with an exponentially long streamed quantum proof, and show SQMASPACE=QMA_EXP (quantum analogue of NEXP). Our first main result shows, in contrast to the classical setting, the solution space of a quantum constraint satisfaction problem (i.e. a local Hamiltonian) is always connected when exponentially long proofs are permitted. For this, we show how to simulate any Lipschitz continuous path on the unit hypersphere via a sequence of local unitary gates, at the expense of blowing up the circuit size. This shows quantum error-correcting codes can be unable to detect one codeword erroneously evolving to another if the evolution happens sufficiently slowly, and answers an open question of [Gharibian, Sikora, ICALP 2015] regarding the Ground State Connectivity problem. Our second main result is that any SQCMASPACE computation can be embedded into "unentanglement", i.e. into a quantum constraint satisfaction problem with unentangled provers. Formally, we show how to embed SQCMASPACE into the Sparse Separable Hamiltonian problem of [Chailloux, Sattath, CCC 2012] (QMA(2)-complete for 1/poly promise gap), at the expense of scaling the promise gap with the streamed proof size. As a corollary, we obtain the first systematic construction for obtaining QMA(2)-type upper bounds on arbitrary multi-prover interactive proof systems, where the QMA(2) promise gap scales exponentially with the number of bits of communication in the interactive proof.Comment: 60 pages, 4 figure

Preuves interactives quantiques

Cette thèse est consacrée à la complexité basée sur le paradigme des preuves interactives. Les classes ainsi définies ont toutes en commun qu’un ou plusieurs prouveurs, infiniment puissants, tentent de convaincre un vérificateur, de puissance bornée, de l’appartenance d’un mot à un langage. Nous abordons ici le modèle classique, où les participants sont des machines de Turing, et le modèle quantique, où ceux-ci sont des circuits quantiques. La revue de littérature que comprend cette thèse s’adresse à un lecteur déjà familier avec la complexité et l’informatique quantique. Cette thèse présente comme résultat la caractérisation de la classe NP par une classe de preuves interactives quantiques de taille logarithmique. Les différentes classes sont présentées dans un ordre permettant d’aborder aussi facilement que possible les classes interactives. Le premier chapitre est consacré aux classes de base de la complexité ; celles-ci seront utiles pour situer les classes subséquemment présentées. Les chapitres deux et trois présentent respectivement les classes à un et à plusieurs prouveurs. La présentation du résultat ci-haut mentionné est l’objet du chapitre quatre.This thesis is devoted to complexity theory based on the interactive proof paradigm. All classes defined in this way involve one or many infinitely powerful provers attempting to convince a verifier of limited power that a string belongs to a certain language. We will consider the classical model, in which the various participants are Turing machines, as well as the quantum model, in which they are quantum circuits. The literature review included in this thesis assume that the reader is familiar with the basics of complexity theory and quantum computing. This thesis presents the original result that the class NP can be characterized by a class of quantum interactive proofs of logarithmic size. The various classes are presented in an order that facilitates the treatment of interactive classes. The first chapter is devoted to the basic complexity classes; these will be useful points of comparison for classes presented subsequently. Chapters two and three respectively present classes with one and many provers. The presentation of the result mentioned above is the object of chapter four

LIPIcs, Volume 251, ITCS 2023, Complete Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 251, ITCS 2023, Complete Volum