IST Austria Thesis

Designing and verifying concurrent programs is a notoriously challenging, time consuming, and error prone task, even for experts. This is due to the sheer number of possible interleavings of a concurrent program, all of which have to be tracked and accounted for in a formal proof. Inventing an inductive invariant that captures all interleavings of a low-level implementation is theoretically possible, but practically intractable. We develop a refinement-based verification framework that provides mechanisms to simplify proof construction by decomposing the verification task into smaller subtasks. In a first line of work, we present a foundation for refinement reasoning over structured concurrent programs. We introduce layered concurrent programs as a compact notation to represent multi-layer refinement proofs. A layered concurrent program specifies a sequence of connected concurrent programs, from most concrete to most abstract, such that common parts of different programs are written exactly once. Each program in this sequence is expressed as structured concurrent program, i.e., a program over (potentially recursive) procedures, imperative control flow, gated atomic actions, structured parallelism, and asynchronous concurrency. This is in contrast to existing refinement-based verifiers, which represent concurrent systems as flat transition relations. We present a powerful refinement proof rule that decomposes refinement checking over structured programs into modular verification conditions. Refinement checking is supported by a new form of modular, parameterized invariants, called yield invariants, and a linear permission system to enhance local reasoning. In a second line of work, we present two new reduction-based program transformations that target asynchronous programs. These transformations reduce the number of interleavings that need to be considered, thus reducing the complexity of invariants. Synchronization simplifies the verification of asynchronous programs by introducing the fiction, for proof purposes, that asynchronous operations complete synchronously. Synchronization summarizes an asynchronous computation as immediate atomic effect. Inductive sequentialization establishes sequential reductions that captures every behavior of the original program up to reordering of coarse-grained commutative actions. A sequential reduction of a concurrent program is easy to reason about since it corresponds to a simple execution of the program in an idealized synchronous environment, where processes act in a fixed order and at the same speed. Our approach is implemented the CIVL verifier, which has been successfully used for the verification of several complex concurrent programs. In our methodology, the overall correctness of a program is established piecemeal by focusing on the invariant required for each refinement step separately. While the programmer does the creative work of specifying the chain of programs and the inductive invariant justifying each link in the chain, the tool automatically constructs the verification conditions underlying each refinement step

Concurrent Kleene Algebra: Free Model and Completeness

Concurrent Kleene Algebra (CKA) was introduced by Hoare, Moeller, Struth and Wehrman in 2009 as a framework to reason about concurrent programs. We prove that the axioms for CKA with bounded parallelism are complete for the semantics proposed in the original paper; consequently, these semantics are the free model for this fragment. This result settles a conjecture of Hoare and collaborators. Moreover, the techniques developed along the way are reusable; in particular, they allow us to establish pomset automata as an operational model for CKA.Comment: Version 2 includes an overview section that outlines the completeness proof, as well as some extra discussion of the interpolation lemma. It also includes better typography and a number of minor fixes. Version 3 incorporates the changes by comments from the anonymous referees at ESOP. Among other things, these include a worked example of computing the syntactic closure by han

Variables as Resource for Shared-Memory Programs: Semantics and Soundness

AbstractParkinson, Bornat, and Calcagno recently introduced a logic for partial correctness in which program variables are treated as resource, generalizing earlier work based on separation logic and permissions. An advantage of their approach is that it yields a logic devoid of complex side conditions: there is no need to pepper the inference rules with “modifies” clauses. They used a simple operational semantics to prove soundness of the sequential fragment of their logic, and they showed that the inference rules of concurrent separation logic can be translated directly into their framework. Their concurrency rules are strictly more powerful than those of concurrent separation logic, since the new logic allows proofs of programs that perform concurrent reads. We provide a denotational semantics and a soundness proof for the concurrent fragment of their logic, extending our earlier work on concurrent separation logic to incorporate permissions in a natural manner

Automated verification of reactive and concurrent programs by calculation

Reactive programs combine traditional sequential programming constructs with primitives to allow communication with other concurrent agents. They are ubiquitous in modern applications, ranging from components systems and web services, to cyber-physical systems and autonomous robots. In this paper, we present an algebraic verification strategy for concurrent reactive programs, with a large or infinite state space. We define novel operators to characterise interactions and state updates, and an associated equational theory. With this we can calculate a reactive program's denotational semantics, and thereby facilitate automated proof. Of note is our reasoning support for iterative programs with reactive invariants, based on Kleene algebra, and for parallel composition. We illustrate our strategy by verifying a reactive buffer. Our laws and strategy are mechanised in Isabelle/UTP, our implementation of Hoare and He's Unifying Theories of Programming (UTP) framework, to provide soundness guarantees and practical verification support

Fractional permissions and non-deterministic evaluators in interval temporal logic

We propose Interval Temporal Logic as a basis for reasoning about concurrent programs with fine-grained atomicity due to the generality it provides over reasoning with standard pre/post-state relations. To simplify the semantics of parallel composition over intervals, we use fractional permissions, which allows one to ensure that conflicting reads and writes to a variable do not occur simultaneously. Using non-deterministic evaluators over intervals, we enable reasoning about the apparent states over an interval, which may differ from the actual states in the interval. The combination of Interval Temporal Logic, non-deterministic evaluators and fractional permissions results in a generic framework for reasoning about concurrent programs with fine-grained atomicity. We use our logic to develop rely/guarantee-style rules for decomposing a proof of a large system into proofs of its subcomponents, where fractional permissions are used to ensure that the behaviours of a program and its environment do not conflict

Actris: session-type based reasoning in separation logic

Message passing is a useful abstraction to implement concurrent programs. For real-world systems, however, it is often combined with other programming and concurrency paradigms, such as higher-order functions, mutable state, shared-memory concurrency, and locks. We present Actris: a logic for proving functional correctness of programs that use a combination of the aforementioned features. Actris combines the power of modern concurrent separation logics with a first-class protocol mechanism - based on session types - for reasoning about message passing in the presence of other concurrency paradigms. We show that Actris provides a suitable level of abstraction by proving functional correctness of a variety of examples, including a distributed merge sort, a distributed load-balancing mapper, and a variant of the map-reduce model, using relatively simple specifications. Soundness of Actris is proved using a model of its protocol mechanism in the Iris framework. We mechanised the theory of Actris, together with tactics for symbolic execution of programs, as well as all examples in the paper, in the Coq proof assistant.Programming Language

Program Verification with Separation Logic

International audienceSeparation Logic is a framework for the development of modular program analyses for sequential, inter-procedural and concurrent programs. The first part of the paper introduces Separation Logic first from a historical, then from a program verification perspective. Because program verification eventually boils down to deciding logical queries such as the validity of verification conditions, the second part is dedicated to a survey of decision procedures for Separation Logic, that stem from either SMT, proof theory or automata theory. Incidentally we address issues related to decidability and computational complexity of such problems, in order to expose certain sources of intractability

Constructing the Views Framework

Abstract. The views framework of Dinsdale-Young and others unifies several compositional techniques for reasoning about concurrent programs. This paper uses simple mathematics to construct the views framework incrementally from first principles. The result is a model for the views framework, which can also be understood as an independent theory of concurrent programs. Along the lines of “sequential programs are binary relations”, the theory adopts the maxim “con-current programs are formal languages”. Consequently, programs obey familiar algebraic laws that can simplify reasoning; there is no need to postulate opera-tional rules; the views program logic can be constructed in a stepwise fashion from more basic logics; program logic and operational thinking become largely decoupled; proving partial correctness becomes straightforward and it holds irre-spectively of the specific choice of programming language constructs, operational rules, and the atomic actions that are implemented in a computer. All theorems have been formally checked with Isabelle/HOL. A proof script is available online. Key words: semantics, formal languages, concurrency, programming calculi