Faster Algorithms for the Maximum Common Subtree Isomorphism Problem

The maximum common subtree isomorphism problem asks for the largest possible isomorphism between subtrees of two given input trees. This problem is a natural restriction of the maximum common subgraph problem, which is ${\sf NP}$-hard in general graphs. Confining to trees renders polynomial time algorithms possible and is of fundamental importance for approaches on more general graph classes. Various variants of this problem in trees have been intensively studied. We consider the general case, where trees are neither rooted nor ordered and the isomorphism is maximum w.r.t. a weight function on the mapped vertices and edges. For trees of order $n$ and maximum degree $\Delta$ our algorithm achieves a running time of $\mathcal{O}(n^2\Delta)$ by exploiting the structure of the matching instances arising as subproblems. Thus our algorithm outperforms the best previously known approaches. No faster algorithm is possible for trees of bounded degree and for trees of unbounded degree we show that a further reduction of the running time would directly improve the best known approach to the assignment problem. Combining a polynomial-delay algorithm for the enumeration of all maximum common subtree isomorphisms with central ideas of our new algorithm leads to an improvement of its running time from $\mathcal{O}(n^6+Tn^2)$ to $\mathcal{O}(n^3+Tn\Delta)$, where $n$ is the order of the larger tree, $T$ is the number of different solutions, and $\Delta$ is the minimum of the maximum degrees of the input trees. Our theoretical results are supplemented by an experimental evaluation on synthetic and real-world instances

Fast reoptimization for the minimum spanning tree problem

AbstractWe study reoptimization versions of the minimum spanning tree problem. The reoptimization setting can generally be formulated as follows: given an instance of the problem for which we already know some optimal solution, and given some “small” perturbations on this instance, is it possible to compute a new (optimal or at least near-optimal) solution for the modified instance without ex nihilo computation? We focus on two kinds of modifications: node-insertions and node-deletions. When k new nodes are inserted together with their incident edges, we mainly propose a fast strategy with complexity O(kn) which provides a max{2,3−(2/(k−1))}-approximation ratio, in complete metric graphs and another one that is optimal with complexity O(nlogn). On the other hand, when k nodes are deleted, we devise a strategy which in O(n) achieves approximation ratio bounded above by 2⌈|Lmax|/2⌉ in complete metric graphs, where Lmax is the longest deleted path and |Lmax| is the number of its edges. For any of the approximation strategies, we also provide lower bounds on their approximation ratios

A Survey on Graph Kernels

Graph kernels have become an established and widely-used technique for solving classification tasks on graphs. This survey gives a comprehensive overview of techniques for kernel-based graph classification developed in the past 15 years. We describe and categorize graph kernels based on properties inherent to their design, such as the nature of their extracted graph features, their method of computation and their applicability to problems in practice. In an extensive experimental evaluation, we study the classification accuracy of a large suite of graph kernels on established benchmarks as well as new datasets. We compare the performance of popular kernels with several baseline methods and study the effect of applying a Gaussian RBF kernel to the metric induced by a graph kernel. In doing so, we find that simple baselines become competitive after this transformation on some datasets. Moreover, we study the extent to which existing graph kernels agree in their predictions (and prediction errors) and obtain a data-driven categorization of kernels as result. Finally, based on our experimental results, we derive a practitioner's guide to kernel-based graph classification