The Role Of The Receptive Field Structure In Neuronal Compressive Sensing Signal Processing

The receptive field structure ubiquitous in the visual system is believed to play a crucial role in encoding stimulus characteristics, such as contrast and spectral composition. However, receptive field architecture may also result in unforeseen difficulties in processing particular classes of images. We explore the potential functional benefits and shortcomings of localization and center-surround paradigms in the context of an integrate-and-fire neuronal network model. Utilizing the sparsity of natural scenes, we derive a compressive-sensing based theoretical framework for network input reconstructions based on neuronal firing rate dynamics [1, 2]. This formalism underlines a potential mechanism for efficiently transmitting sparse stimulus information, and further suggests sensory pathways may have evolved to take advantage of the sparsity of visual stimuli [3, 4]. Using this methodology, we investigate how the accuracy of image encoding depends on the network architecture. We demonstrate that the receptive field structure does indeed facilitate marked improvements in natural stimulus encoding at the price of yielding erroneous information about specific classes of stimuli. Relative to uniformly random sampling, we show that localized random sampling yields robust improvements in image reconstructions, which are most pronounced for natural stimuli containing a relatively large spread of dominant low frequency components. This suggests a novel direction for compressive sensing theory and sampling methodology in engineered devices. However, for images with specific gray-scale patterning, such as the Hermann grid depicted in Fig. 1, we show that localization in sampling produces systematic errors in image encoding that may underlie several optical illusions. We expect that these connections between input characteristics, network topology, and neuronal dynamics will give new insights into the structure-function relationship of the visual system

Spatial vision in insects is facilitated by shaping the dynamics of visual input through behavioral action

Egelhaaf M, Boeddeker N, Kern R, Kurtz R, Lindemann JP. Spatial vision in insects is facilitated by shaping the dynamics of visual input through behavioral action. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2012;6:108.Insects such as flies or bees, with their miniature brains, are able to control highly aerobatic flight maneuvres and to solve spatial vision tasks, such as avoiding collisions with obstacles, landing on objects, or even localizing a previously learnt inconspicuous goal on the basis of environmental cues. With regard to solving such spatial tasks, these insects still outperform man-made autonomous flying systems. To accomplish their extraordinary performance, flies and bees have been shown by their characteristic behavioral actions to actively shape the dynamics of the image flow on their eyes ("optic flow"). The neural processing of information about the spatial layout of the environment is greatly facilitated by segregating the rotational from the translational optic flow component through a saccadic flight and gaze strategy. This active vision strategy thus enables the nervous system to solve apparently complex spatial vision tasks in a particularly efficient and parsimonious way. The key idea of this review is that biological agents, such as flies or bees, acquire at least part of their strength as autonomous systems through active interactions with their environment and not by simply processing passively gained information about the world. These agent-environment interactions lead to adaptive behavior in surroundings of a wide range of complexity. Animals with even tiny brains, such as insects, are capable of performing extraordinarily well in their behavioral contexts by making optimal use of the closed action-perception loop. Model simulations and robotic implementations show that the smart biological mechanisms of motion computation and visually-guided flight control might be helpful to find technical solutions, for example, when designing micro air vehicles carrying a miniaturized, low-weight on-board processor

GPS tracking technology and re-visiting the relationship between the avian visual Wulst and homing pigeon navigation

: Within their familiar areas homing pigeons rely on familiar visual landscape features and landmarks for homing. However, the neural basis of visual landmark-based navigation has been so far investigated mainly in relation to the role of the hippocampal formation. The avian visual Wulst is the telencephalic projection field of the thalamofugal pathway that has been suggested to be involved in processing lateral visual inputs that originate from the far visual field. The Wulst is therefore a good candidate for a neural structure participating in the visual control of familiar visual landmark-based navigation. We repeatedly released and tracked Wulst-lesioned and control homing pigeons from three sites about 10-15 km from the loft. Wulst lesions did not impair the ability of the pigeons to orient homeward during the first release from each of the three sites nor to localise the loft within the home area. In addition, Wulst-lesioned pigeons displayed unimpaired route fidelity acquisition to a repeated homing path compared to the intact birds. However, compared to control birds, Wulst-lesioned pigeons displayed persistent oscillatory flight patterns across releases, diminished attention to linear (leading lines) landscape features, such as roads and wood edges, and less direct flight paths within the home area. Differences and similarities between the effects of Wulst and hippocampal lesions suggest that although the visual Wulst does not seem to play a direct role in the memory representation of a landscape-landmark map, it does seem to participate in influencing the perceptual construction of such a map

Visual Adaptations and Behavioural Strategies to Detect and Catch Small Targets

Predatory behaviours are ideal for studying the limits of performance and control within animals. Predation naturally creates a competition between the sensors and physiology of predator and prey. Aerial predation demonstrates the greatest feats of physical performance, demanding the highest speeds and accelerations whilst both predator and prey are free to pitch, yaw, and roll. These high speeds and degrees of rotational freedom make control a complex problem. However, from the perspective of the researcher attempting to decipher the control laws that underpin predator guidance, the question is made more soluble by the predator’s fixation on its target. The goal of the pursuer is clear, to contact the target, and thus their systems are focused on the optimization of that action. This is as opposed to more mundane activities, where conflicting interests compete for the attention and behavioural response of the animal. In order to study the necessary trade-offs that underpin aerial predation, this thesis will focus on the hunting behaviour of two fly species. The first is a robber fly, Holcocephala fusca, on which the majority of the first two chapters focus. Secondarily, work with the killer fly Coenosia attenuata will be included in the latter two chapters as a direct contrast to results from Holcocephala. Both are miniature dipteran predators, but not closely related. The structure of this thesis is broken into six chapters, summarised in the following list: 1. Thecompoundeyeofinsectsgenerallyhasmuchpoorerresolutionthanthatofcameratype eyes. Poor resolution is exacerbated in smaller insects that cannot commit the resources required for eyes with large lenses that facilitate high spatial resolution. Holcocephala has developed a small number of facets into a forward-facing acute zone where the spatial acuity is reduced to ~0.28°, rivalling the very best resolution of any compound eye. The only compound eyes with a comparable spatial resolution belong to dragonflies, in excess of an order of magnitude larger than Holcocephala. 2. Numerous potential targets may be airborne within the visual range of a predator. Not all of these may be suitable. Chasing unsuitable targets may waste energy or result in direct harm should they turn out to be larger than the predator can overcome. It is thus a strong imperative for a predator to filter the targets it takes after. Targets silhouetted against the sky display a paucity of cues that a predator could use to determine their size. Holcocephala displays acute size selectivity towards smaller targets. This selectivity goes beyond heuristic rules and size/speed ratios. Instead, Holcocephala appears able to determine absolute size and distance of targets. 3. Both Holcocephala and Coenosia intercept targets, heading for where the target is going to be in the future rather than its current location. Both species plot trajectories in keeping with the guidance law of proportional navigation, an algorithm derived for modern guided missiles. There are key differences evident in the internal physiological constants applied to the control system between the species. These differences are likely linked to the specific environmental conditions and visual physiologies of the flies, especially the range at which targets are attacked. 4. Stemming from the use of the proportional navigational framework, this chapter dives into the intricacies of gain and the weighting of the navigational constant, and the geometric factors that underpin the control effort and eventual success of the control system. 5. “Falcon-diving” can be found in killer flies dropping from their enclosure ceiling, in which they miss targets after diving towards them. Through proportional navigation, it can be demonstrated that the navigational system combined with excessive speed results in acceleration demands the body cannot match. 6. Holcocephala is capable of evading static obstacle whilst intercepting targets. Application of proportional navigation and a secondary obstacle-evasive controller can demonstrate where the fly is combining multiple inputs to guide its heading.This work was funded by the United States Airforce Office of Scientific Research

Making a stronger case for comparative research to investigate the behavioral and neurological bases of three-dimensional navigation

The rich diversity of avian natural history provides exciting possibilities for comparative research aimed at understanding three-dimensional navigation. We propose some hypotheses relating differences in natural history to potential behavioral and neurological adaptations possessed by contrasting bird species. This comparative approach may offer unique insights into some of the important questions raised by Jeffery et al

Flying Free: A Research Overview of Deep Learning in Drone Navigation Autonomy

With the rise of Deep Learning approaches in computer vision applications, significant strides have been made towards vehicular autonomy. Research activity in autonomous drone navigation has increased rapidly in the past five years, and drones are moving fast towards the ultimate goal of near-complete autonomy. However, while much work in the area focuses on specific tasks in drone navigation, the contribution to the overall goal of autonomy is often not assessed, and a comprehensive overview is needed. In this work, a taxonomy of drone navigation autonomy is established by mapping the definitions of vehicular autonomy levels, as defined by the Society of Automotive Engineers, to specific drone tasks in order to create a clear definition of autonomy when applied to drones. A top–down examination of research work in the area is conducted, focusing on drone navigation tasks, in order to understand the extent of research activity in each area. Autonomy levels are cross-checked against the drone navigation tasks addressed in each work to provide a framework for understanding the trajectory of current research. This work serves as a guide to research in drone autonomy with a particular focus on Deep Learning-based solutions, indicating key works and areas of opportunity for development of this area in the future

The Paradox of Human Expertise: Why Experts Can Get It Wrong

Expertise is correctly, but one-sidedly, associated with special abilities and enhanced performance. The other side of expertise, however, is surreptitiously hidden. Along with expertise, performance may also be degraded, culminating in a lack of flexibility and error. Expertise is demystified by explaining the brain functions and cognitive architecture involved in being an expert. These information processing mechanisms, the very making of expertise, entail computational trade-offs that sometimes result in paradoxical functional degradation. For example, being an expert entails using schemas, selective attention, chunking information, automaticity, and more reliance on top-down information, all of which allow experts to perform quickly and efficiently; however, these very mechanisms restrict flexibility and control, may cause the experts to miss and ignore important information, introduce tunnel vision and bias, and can cause other effects that degrade performance. Such phenomena are apparent in a wide range of expert domains, from medical professionals and forensic examiners, to military fighter pilots and financial traders