286 research outputs found

    A max-plus finite element method for solving finite horizon deterministic optimal control problems

    Get PDF
    We introduce a max-plus analogue of the Petrov-Galerkin finite element method, to solve finite horizon deterministic optimal control problems. The method relies on a max-plus variational formulation, and exploits the properties of projectors on max-plus semimodules. We obtain a nonlinear discretized semigroup, corresponding to a zero-sum two players game. We give an error estimate of order (Δt)1/2+Δx(Δt)−1(\Delta t)^{1/2}+\Delta x(\Delta t)^{-1}, for a subclass of problems in dimension 1. We compare our method with a max-plus based discretization method previously introduced by Fleming and McEneaney.Comment: 13 pages, 5 figure

    The max-plus finite element method for solving deterministic optimal control problems: basic properties and convergence analysis

    Get PDF
    We introduce a max-plus analogue of the Petrov-Galerkin finite element method to solve finite horizon deterministic optimal control problems. The method relies on a max-plus variational formulation. We show that the error in the sup norm can be bounded from the difference between the value function and its projections on max-plus and min-plus semimodules, when the max-plus analogue of the stiffness matrix is exactly known. In general, the stiffness matrix must be approximated: this requires approximating the operation of the Lax-Oleinik semigroup on finite elements. We consider two approximations relying on the Hamiltonian. We derive a convergence result, in arbitrary dimension, showing that for a class of problems, the error estimate is of order δ+Δx(δ)−1\delta+\Delta x(\delta)^{-1} or δ+Δx(δ)−1\sqrt{\delta}+\Delta x(\delta)^{-1}, depending on the choice of the approximation, where δ\delta and Δx\Delta x are respectively the time and space discretization steps. We compare our method with another max-plus based discretization method previously introduced by Fleming and McEneaney. We give numerical examples in dimension 1 and 2.Comment: 31 pages, 11 figure

    Bundle-based pruning in the max-plus curse of dimensionality free method

    Full text link
    Recently a new class of techniques termed the max-plus curse of dimensionality-free methods have been developed to solve nonlinear optimal control problems. In these methods the discretization in state space is avoided by using a max-plus basis expansion of the value function. This requires storing only the coefficients of the basis functions used for representation. However, the number of basis functions grows exponentially with respect to the number of time steps of propagation to the time horizon of the control problem. This so called "curse of complexity" can be managed by applying a pruning procedure which selects the subset of basis functions that contribute most to the approximation of the value function. The pruning procedures described thus far in the literature rely on the solution of a sequence of high dimensional optimization problems which can become computationally expensive. In this paper we show that if the max-plus basis functions are linear and the region of interest in state space is convex, the pruning problem can be efficiently solved by the bundle method. This approach combining the bundle method and semidefinite formulations is applied to the quantum gate synthesis problem, in which the state space is the special unitary group (which is non-convex). This is based on the observation that the convexification of the unitary group leads to an exact relaxation. The results are studied and validated via examples

    Curse of dimensionality reduction in max-plus based approximation methods: theoretical estimates and improved pruning algorithms

    Full text link
    Max-plus based methods have been recently developed to approximate the value function of possibly high dimensional optimal control problems. A critical step of these methods consists in approximating a function by a supremum of a small number of functions (max-plus "basis functions") taken from a prescribed dictionary. We study several variants of this approximation problem, which we show to be continuous versions of the facility location and kk-center combinatorial optimization problems, in which the connection costs arise from a Bregman distance. We give theoretical error estimates, quantifying the number of basis functions needed to reach a prescribed accuracy. We derive from our approach a refinement of the curse of dimensionality free method introduced previously by McEneaney, with a higher accuracy for a comparable computational cost.Comment: 8pages 5 figure
    • …
    corecore