1,268 research outputs found

    Decision-Making for Automated Vehicles Using a Hierarchical Behavior-Based Arbitration Scheme

    Full text link
    Behavior planning and decision-making are some of the biggest challenges for highly automated systems. A fully automated vehicle (AV) is confronted with numerous tactical and strategical choices. Most state-of-the-art AV platforms implement tactical and strategical behavior generation using finite state machines. However, these usually result in poor explainability, maintainability and scalability. Research in robotics has raised many architectures to mitigate these problems, most interestingly behavior-based systems and hybrid derivatives. Inspired by these approaches, we propose a hierarchical behavior-based architecture for tactical and strategical behavior generation in automated driving. It is a generalizing and scalable decision-making framework, utilizing modular behavior blocks to compose more complex behaviors in a bottom-up approach. The system is capable of combining a variety of scenario- and methodology-specific solutions, like POMDPs, RRT* or learning-based behavior, into one understandable and traceable architecture. We extend the hierarchical behavior-based arbitration concept to address scenarios where multiple behavior options are applicable but have no clear priority against each other. Then, we formulate the behavior generation stack for automated driving in urban and highway environments, incorporating parking and emergency behaviors as well. Finally, we illustrate our design in an explanatory evaluation

    A Simulation Environment with Reduced Reality Gap for Testing Autonomous Vehicles

    Get PDF
    In order to facilitate acceptance and ensure safety, autonomous vehicles must be tested not only in typical and relatively safe scenarios but also in dangerous and less frequent scenarios. Recent pedestrian fatalities caused by test vehicles of the front-running giants like Google and Tesla suffice the fact that Autonomous Vehicle technology is not yet mature enough and still needs rigorous exposure to a wide range of traffic, landscape, and natural conditions on which the Autonomous Vehicles can be trained on to perform as expected in real traffic conditions. Simulation Environments have been considered as an efficient, safe, flexible and cost-effective option for the training, testing, and validation of Autonomous Vehicle technology. While ad-hoc task-specific use of simulation in Autonomous Driving research is widespread, simulation platforms that bridge the gap between simulation and reality are limited. This research proposes to set up a highly realistic simulation environment (using CARLA driving simulator) to generate realistic data to be used for Autonomous Driving research. Our system is able to recreate the original traffic scenarios based on prior information about the traffic scene. Furthermore, the system will allow to make changes to the original scenarios and create various desired testing scenarios by varying the parameters of traffic actors, such as location, trajectory, speed, motion states, etc. and hence collect more data with ease

    Look Who's Talking Now: Implications of AV's Explanations on Driver's Trust, AV Preference, Anxiety and Mental Workload

    Full text link
    Explanations given by automation are often used to promote automation adoption. However, it remains unclear whether explanations promote acceptance of automated vehicles (AVs). In this study, we conducted a within-subject experiment in a driving simulator with 32 participants, using four different conditions. The four conditions included: (1) no explanation, (2) explanation given before or (3) after the AV acted and (4) the option for the driver to approve or disapprove the AV's action after hearing the explanation. We examined four AV outcomes: trust, preference for AV, anxiety and mental workload. Results suggest that explanations provided before an AV acted were associated with higher trust in and preference for the AV, but there was no difference in anxiety and workload. These results have important implications for the adoption of AVs.Comment: 42 pages, 5 figures, 3 Table

    A Systematic Survey of Control Techniques and Applications: From Autonomous Vehicles to Connected and Automated Vehicles

    Full text link
    Vehicle control is one of the most critical challenges in autonomous vehicles (AVs) and connected and automated vehicles (CAVs), and it is paramount in vehicle safety, passenger comfort, transportation efficiency, and energy saving. This survey attempts to provide a comprehensive and thorough overview of the current state of vehicle control technology, focusing on the evolution from vehicle state estimation and trajectory tracking control in AVs at the microscopic level to collaborative control in CAVs at the macroscopic level. First, this review starts with vehicle key state estimation, specifically vehicle sideslip angle, which is the most pivotal state for vehicle trajectory control, to discuss representative approaches. Then, we present symbolic vehicle trajectory tracking control approaches for AVs. On top of that, we further review the collaborative control frameworks for CAVs and corresponding applications. Finally, this survey concludes with a discussion of future research directions and the challenges. This survey aims to provide a contextualized and in-depth look at state of the art in vehicle control for AVs and CAVs, identifying critical areas of focus and pointing out the potential areas for further exploration

    Intention-Aware Decision-Making for Mixed Intersection Scenarios

    Full text link
    This paper presents a white-box intention-aware decision-making for the handling of interactions between a pedestrian and an automated vehicle (AV) in an unsignalized street crossing scenario. Moreover, a design framework has been developed, which enables automated parameterization of the decision-making. This decision-making is designed in such a manner that it can understand pedestrians in urban traffic and can react accordingly to their intentions. That way, a human-like response to the actions of the pedestrian is ensured, leading to a higher acceptance of AVs. The core notion of this paper is that the intention prediction of the pedestrian to cross the street and decision-making are divided into two subsystems. On the one hand, the intention detection is a data-driven, black-box model. Thus, it can model the complex behavior of the pedestrians. On the other hand, the decision-making is a white-box model to ensure traceability and to enable a rapid verification and validation of AVs. This white-box decision-making provides human-like behavior and a guaranteed prevention of deadlocks. An additional benefit is that the proposed decision-making requires low computational resources only enabling real world usage. The automated parameterization uses a particle swarm optimization and compares two different models of the pedestrian: The social force model and the Markov decision process model. Consequently, a rapid design of the decision-making is possible and different pedestrian behaviors can be taken into account. The results reinforce the applicability of the proposed intention-aware decision-making

    A systematic literature review on the relationship between autonomous vehicle technology and traffic-related mortality.

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ–‰์ •๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๊ธ€๋กœ๋ฒŒํ–‰์ •์ „๊ณต, 2023. 2. ์ตœํƒœํ˜„.The society is anticipated to gain a lot from Autonomous Vehicles (AV), such as improved traffic flow and a decrease in accidents. They heavily rely on improvements in various Artificial Intelligence (AI) processes and strategies. Though some researchers in this field believe AV is the key to enhancing safety, others believe AV creates new challenges when it comes to ensuring the security of these new technology/systems and applications. The article conducts a systematic literature review on the relationship between autonomous vehicle technology and traffic-related mortality. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, articles from EBSCO, ProQuest, IEEE Explorer, Web of Science were chosen, and they were then sorted. The findings reveal that the most of these publications have been published in advanced transport-related journals. Future improvements in the automobile industry and the development of intelligent transportation systems could help reduce the number of fatal traffic accidents. Technologies for autonomous cars provide effective ways to enhance the driving experience and reduce the number of traffic accidents. A multitude of driving-related problems, such as crashes, traffic, energy usage, and environmental pollution, will be helped by autonomous driving technology. More research is needed for the significant majority of the studies that were assessed. They need to be expanded so that they can be tested in real-world or computer-simulated scenarios, in better and more realistic scenarios, with better and more data, and in experimental designs where the results of the proposed strategy are compared to those of industry standards and competing strategies. Therefore, additional study with improved methods is needed. Another major area that requires additional research is the moral and ethical choices made by AVs. Government, policy makers, manufacturers, and designers all need to do many actions in order to deploy autonomous vehicles on the road effectively. The government should develop laws, rules, and an action plan in particular. It is important to create more effective programs that might encourage the adoption of emerging technology in transportation systems, such as driverless vehicles. In this regard, user perception becomes essential since it may inform designers about current issues and observations made by people. The perceptions of autonomous car users in developing countries like Azerbaijan haven't been thoroughly studied up to this point. The manufacturer has to fix the system flaw and needs a good data set for efficient operation. In the not-too-distant future, the widespread use of highly automated vehicles (AVs) may open up intriguing new possibilities for resolving persistent issues in current safety-related research. Further research is required to better understand and quantify the significant policy implications of Avs, taking into consideration factors like penetration rate, public adoption, technological advancements, traffic patterns, and business models. It only needs to take into account peer-reviewed, full-text journal papers for the investigation, but it's clear that a larger database and more documents would provide more results and a more thorough analysis.์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ(AV)๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ตํ†ต ํ๋ฆ„์ด ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜๊ณ  ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ์ค„์–ด๋“œ๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์‚ฌํšŒ๊ฐ€ ์–ป๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋งŽ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ(AI) ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์™€ ์ „๋žต์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ AV๊ฐ€ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์—ด์‡ ๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ฏฟ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ AV๊ฐ€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ์ˆ /์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ฐ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์˜ ๋ณด์•ˆ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฏฟ๋Š”๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ๊ตํ†ต ๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ฌ๋ง๋ฅ  ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ธ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํฌํ•จ ๋ฐ ์ œ์™ธ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ EBSCO, ProQuest, IEEE Explorer ๋ฐ Web of Science์˜ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ถœํŒ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ์šด์†ก ๊ด€๋ จ ์ €๋„์— ๊ฒŒ์žฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์˜ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์‚ฐ์—…์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ๊ณผ ์ง€๋Šฅํ˜• ๊ตํ†ต ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์€ ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ๊ตํ†ต ์‚ฌ๊ณ ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์šด์ „ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ๊ตํ†ต ์‚ฌ๊ณ ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ถฉ๋Œ, ๊ตํ†ต, ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์˜ค์—ผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ์šด์ „ ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์€ ์ž์œจ ์ฃผํ–‰ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋„์›€์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ฐ€๋œ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ๋˜๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค, ๋” ์ข‹๊ณ  ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค, ๋” ์ข‹๊ณ  ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ „๋žต ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฐ์—… ํ‘œ์ค€ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ์ „๋žต์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ต๋˜๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์—์„œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ™•์žฅ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ถ„์•ผ๋Š” AV์˜ ๋„๋•์ , ์œค๋ฆฌ์  ์„ ํƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ •๋ถ€, ์ •์ฑ… ์ž…์•ˆ์ž, ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด ๋ฐ ์„ค๊ณ„์ž๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ž์œจ ์ฃผํ–‰ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„๋กœ์— ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์กฐ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ทจํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ํŠนํžˆ ๋ฒ•, ๊ทœ์น™, ์‹คํ–‰ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šด์ „์ž ์—†๋Š” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์šด์†ก ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ฑ„ํƒ์„ ์žฅ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ, ์„ค๊ณ„์ž์—๊ฒŒ ํ˜„์žฌ ์ด์Šˆ์™€ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ์„ ์•Œ๋ ค์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธ์‹์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด ๋œ๋‹ค.์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ž‘๋™์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ข‹์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์„ธํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ฉ€์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์—, ๊ณ ๋„๋กœ ์ž๋™ํ™”๋œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰(AV)์˜ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์€ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์—ด์–ด์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณด๊ธ‰๋ฅ , ๊ณต๊ณต ์ฑ„ํƒ, ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ฐœ์ „, ๊ตํ†ต ํŒจํ„ด ๋ฐ ๋น„์ฆˆ๋‹ˆ์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ Avs์˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ •์ฑ… ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋™๋ฃŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์นœ ์ „๋ฌธ ์ €๋„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ๋งŒ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๊ฐ€ ์ปค์ง€๊ณ  ๋ฌธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์•„์ง€๋ฉด ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋” ์ฒ ์ €ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์ด ์ œ๊ณต๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•˜๋‹ค.Abstract 3 Table of Contents 6 List of Tables 7 List of Figures 7 List of Appendix 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1. Background 8 1.2. Purpose of Research 13 CHAPTER 2: AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES 21 2.1. Intelligent Traffic Systems 21 2.2. System Architecture for Autonomous Vehicles 22 2.3. Key components in AV classification 27 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY AND DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 35 CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 39 4.1. RQ1: Do autonomous vehicles reduce traffic-related deaths 40 4.2. RQ2: Are there any challenges to using autonomous vehicles 63 4.3. RQ3: As a developing country, how effective is the use of autonomous vehicles for reducing traffic mortality 72 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION 76 5.1. Summary 76 5.2. Implications and Recommendations 80 5.3. Limitation of the study 91 Bibliography 93 List of Tables Table 1: The 6 Levels of Autonomous Vehicles Table 2: Search strings Table 3: Inclusion and exclusion criteria List of Figures Figure 1: Traffic Death Comparison with Europe Figure 2: Research strategy and study selection process List of Appendix Appendix 1: List of selected articles์„
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore